UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION


Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of

the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

(Amendment No.           )
Filed by the Registrant   ☒
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant   ☐
Check the appropriate box:

Preliminary Proxy Statement

Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))

Definitive Proxy Statement

Definitive Additional Materials

Soliciting Material under §240.14a-12
PRIMORIS SERVICES CORPORATION
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

No fee required.

Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

Fee computed on table in exhibit required by Item 25(b) per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.



[MISSING IMAGE: lg_pscprimoris-pn.jpg]
A Message from Our Chairman

Filed by the Registrant  x

[MISSING IMAGE: ph_davidlking-4clr.gif]

Filed by“With a Party other thancontinued focus on operational productivity, talent development, and a robust project mix that aligns with market demands, Primoris is well-positioned to profitably grow as we facilitate the Registranto

Check the appropriate box:

o

modernization of North America’s infrastructure. Through safe and consistent execution, our teams are delivering critical work that supports economic growth, spearheads a sustainable future, and provides shareholder value.”

Preliminary Proxy Statement

o

Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))

x

Definitive Proxy Statement

o

Definitive Additional Materials

o

Soliciting Material under §240.14a-12

PRIMORIS SERVICES CORPORATION

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

x

No fee required.

o

Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.

(1)

Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

(2)

Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

(3)

Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

(4)

Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

(5)

Total fee paid:

o

Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

o

Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.

(1)

Amount Previously Paid:

(2)

Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

(3)

Filing Party:

(4)

Date Filed:


DEAR STOCKHOLDERS:

Table of Contents

2100 McKinney Avenue, Suite 1500
Dallas, Texas 75201

www.prim.com

Dear Stockholder:

On behalf of the Board of Directors, I am pleased to invite you to attend the 20162024 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Primoris Services Corporation, a Delaware corporation (NASDAQ:(NYSE: PRIM), to be held on Tuesday,Wednesday, May 3, 2016,1, 2024, at 9:00 a.m., Central Time.

We will provide virtual access to the meeting. To participate, register at https://www.viewproxy.com/Primoris/2024/ by 11:59 p.m. Central Time aton April 26, 2024. You will need to enter your information, including the Rosewood Crescent Hotel, located at 400 Crescent Court, Dallas, Texas 75201.

control number from your proxy card or voting instruction form, to receive a password to attend the meeting.

As always, we encourage you to vote your shares prior to the Annual Meeting by completing and returning the enclosed proxy card.
During the Annual Meeting, we will discuss each item of business described in the accompanying Notice of the 20162024 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and Proxy Statement. We encourage you to carefully read these materials and the Annual Report to Stockholders on SEC Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015, acarefully. A copy of whichthe Annual Report is included within this mailing. These materials are also available on our website at www.prim.com.
Your vote is important to ensure the Noticepresence of a quorum, whether or not you plan to attend the meeting. Please ensure that your shares are represented and the Proxy Statement.

Please participate in our Annual Meeting of Stockholdersvoted by signing, dating and promptly mailing your enclosed proxy card to ensure the presence of a quorum. Your vote is important, whether or not you plan to attend. I hope you will ensure that your shares are represented and voted by completing and returning the enclosed proxy card. If you plan to attend the Annual Meeting of Stockholders virtually, you will have the right to revoke your proxy and vote in personduring the meeting if you so desire. If you hold your shares through an account with a broker, nominee, fiduciary or other custodian, please follow the instructions you receive from them to vote your shares.

Thank you for your ongoing support of and continued interest in Primoris Services Corporation.

Sincerely,

Brian Pratt

By Order of the Board of Directors,
[MISSING IMAGE: sg_davidlking-bw.jpg]
David L. King
Chairman of the Board








Table

Notice of Contents

2100 McKinney Avenue, Suite 1500

Dallas, Texas 75201

www.prim.com

the 2024
Annual Meeting of Stockholders

March 22, 2024

NOTICE OF THE

2015 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

To Be Held On May 3, 2016


TO OUR STOCKHOLDERS:

March 31, 2016

To our Stockholders:

The 20162024 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Primoris Services Corporation, a Delaware corporation, will be held virtually on Tuesday,Wednesday, May 3, 2016,1, 2024, at 9:00 a.m., Central Time, at the Rosewood Crescent Hotel, located at 400 Crescent Court, Dallas, Texas 75201.

Time.

Only stockholders that owned shares of our common stockCommon Stock at the close of business on March 31, 201611, 2024 are entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. A list of our stockholders will be made available at our principal executive offices at 2100 McKinney Avenue,2300 N. Field Street, Suite 1500,1900, Dallas, Texas 75201 during ordinary business hours for ten days prior to the Annual Meeting andMeeting. The list will also be available atfor the Annual Meeting.

duration of the virtual meeting via a secure link provided to stockholders who register to attend the virtual meeting.

At the Annual Meeting, we will consider the following proposals, which are described in detail in the accompanying Proxy Statement:

1.
to elect two Class Bnine Directors to hold office for a three-yearone-year term expiring at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held in 20192025 or until a successor is electedqualified and qualified. The Board of Directors has nominated Stephen C. Cook and Peter J. Moerbeek for election as Class B Directors atelected;
2.
to approve, in an advisory, non-binding vote, the meeting;

2.Company’s named executive officer compensation;

3.
to ratify the appointment of Moss Adams LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2016;2024; and

3.

4.
to transact such other business as may properly come before the Annual Meeting and all adjournments or postponements thereof.

Attending the Annual Meeting Virtually
We have created and implemented the virtual format in order to facilitate stockholder attendance and participation by enabling stockholders to participate fully, and equally, from any location around the world, at no cost. However, you will bear any costs associated with your Internet access, such as usage charges from Internet access providers and telephone companies. A virtual Annual Meeting makes it possible for more stockholders (regardless of size, resources or physical location) to have direct access to information more quickly, while saving the Company and our stockholders time and money. We also believe that the online tools we have selected will increase stockholder communication. For example, the virtual format allows stockholders to communicate with us during the Annual Meeting so they can ask questions of our Board of Directors or management. During the live Q&A session of the Annual Meeting, we may answer questions as they come in to the extent relevant to the business of the Annual Meeting, as time permits.
Both stockholders of record and stockholders who hold their shares in “street name” will need to register to be able to attend the Annual Meeting via live audio webcast, submit their questions, and vote their shares electronically at the Annual Meeting by following the instructions below. Questions by stockholders can also be submitted via the meeting website in advance of the Annual Meeting, in addition to during the Annual Meeting.
[MISSING IMAGE: tm212391d2-icon_calendrpn.gif]
WHEN IS THE MEETING?
Wednesday, May 1, 2024,
at 9:00 a.m., Central Time
[MISSING IMAGE: tm212391d2-icon_virtualpn.gif]
HOW DO I ACCESS THE VIRTUAL MEETING?
Log in at https:// www.viewproxy.com/Primoris/ 2024/vm and use the password you received via the registration confirmation email and the control number found on your proxy card
[MISSING IMAGE: tm212391d1-icon_votepn.gif]
WHO CAN VOTE?
Only stockholders that owned shares of our Common Stock at the close of business on
March 11, 2024
are entitled to vote



If you are a stockholder of record, you must:

Register at https://www.viewproxy.com/Primoris/2024/ by 11:59 p.m. Central Time on April 26, 2024. You will need to enter your name, phone number, control number (which is included on your proxy card), and email address as part of the registration process, following which you will receive an email confirming your registration and providing your password to attend the Annual Meeting.

On the day of the Annual Meeting, if you have properly registered, you may enter the Annual Meeting by logging in at https://www.viewproxy.com/Primoris/2024/vm and using the password you received via the registration confirmation email and the control number found on your proxy card.

If you wish to vote your shares electronically at the Annual Meeting, you will need to visit the link provided during the Annual Meeting while the polls are open, and you will need your control number found on your proxy card.
If your shares are held in “street name”, you must:

Obtain a legal proxy from your broker, bank, or other nominee.

Register at https://www.viewproxy.com/Primoris/2024/ by 11:59 p.m. Central Time on April 26, 2024. You will need to enter your name, phone number, and email address and provide a copy of the legal proxy (which may be uploaded to the registration website or emailed to VirtualMeeting@viewproxy.com) as part of the registration process, following which you will receive an email confirming your registration and providing your password and virtual control number to attend the Annual Meeting. Please note that if you do not provide a copy of the legal proxy, you may still attend the Annual Meeting, but you will be unable to vote your shares electronically during the Annual Meeting.

On the day of the Annual Meeting, if you have properly registered, you may enter the Annual Meeting by logging in at https://www.viewproxy.com/Primoris/2024/vm and using the password you received via the registration confirmation email and the virtual control number assigned to you in the registration confirmation email.

If you wish to vote your shares electronically at the Annual Meeting, you will need to visit the link provided during the Annual Meeting while the polls are open, and you will need your virtual control number assigned to you in the registration confirmation email.
Technical Difficulties
We will have technicians ready to assist you with any technical difficulties you may have accessing the Annual Meeting live audio webcast. Please be sure to check in by 8:30 a.m. Central Time on May 1, 2024, the day of the Annual Meeting, so we may address any technical difficulties before the Annual Meeting live audio webcast begins. If you encounter any difficulties accessing the Annual Meeting live audio webcast during the check-in or meeting time, please email VirtualMeeting@viewproxy.com or call 866-612-8937.
PLEASE VOTE PROMPTLY—YOUR PROXY IS REVOCABLE AND YOU MAY VOTE IN PERSONVIRTUALLY AT THE MEETING IF YOU WISH.

References to “Primoris”, the “Company”, “we”, “us” or “our” in this Notice and the accompanying Proxy Statement refer to Primoris Services Corporation and its subsidiaries and affiliates, unless otherwise indicated.

[MISSING IMAGE: ph_johnmperisich-4c.jpg]
By Order of the Board of Directors,

[MISSING IMAGE: sg_johnmperisich-bw.jpg]

John M. Perisich

Executive Vice President, General CounselChief Legal and Administrative Officer and Secretary



TableThis Notice of Contents

2100 McKinney Avenue, Suite 1500

Dallas, Texas 75201

www.prim.com

PROXY STATEMENT

FOR THE

2016 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

TO BE HELD ON MAY 3, 2016

SOLICITATION

the 2024 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and Proxy Statement are first being distributed or made
available, as the case may be, on or about March 22, 2024.

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Stockholder Meeting to Be Held on May 1, 2024: This Proxy Statement and our Annual Report are available free of charge at https://www.cstproxy.com/Primoris/2024, a site that does not have “cookies” that identifies visitors to the site.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

TABLE OF CONTENTS
1
1
4
5
6
7
12
12
13
23
23
23
24
24
24
25
26
26
28
31
31
33
33
33
33
33
34
35
36
38
38
39
40
40
40
41
42
43
43
48
48
49
50
51
51
52
53


TABLE OF CONTENTS

55
56
56
57
58
59
60
60
61
64
65


TABLE OF CONTENTS
PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY

Voting Matters, Vote Recommendations and Rationale
Voting MatterBoard Voting
Recommendation
Proposal 1: Election of Directors
The Board believes that each of the Director nominees possess the right set of skills, experience and background necessary to oversee our business and protect the interests of shareholders.
FOR each nominee
(see page 12)
Proposal 2: To Approve, in an Advisory, Non-Binding Vote, the Company’s Named Executive Officer Compensation
The Board and the Compensation Committee believe that compensation policies and procedures are competitive and strongly aligned with the long-term interest of our stockholders.
FOR
Proposal 3: Ratification of Selection of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board and the Audit Committee believe that the retention of Moss Adams LLP is in the best interest of the Company and its stockholders.
FOR

2024 PROXY STATEMENTPRIMORIS   |   1

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Proxy Statement Summary
How to Vote
[MISSING IMAGE: tm2130832d1-icon_virtualpn.jpg]
Online
[MISSING IMAGE: tm212391d2-icon_mailpn.jpg]
Vote by Mail
[MISSING IMAGE: tm212391d2-icon_changepn.jpg]
Changing your
vote after
returning your
proxy card
Stockholders of Record
Before the Meeting:
Have your proxy card available and access www.cstproxyvote.com then follow the prompts to vote your shares.
During the Meeting:
If you have properly registered, you may enter the Annual Meeting by logging in at https://www.viewproxy.com/Primoris/2023/vm using the password you received via the registration confirmation email and the control number found on your proxy card.
You can then vote via the link provided during the Annual Meeting while the polls are open. You will need your control number found on your proxy card
Please complete and properly sign and date the accompanying proxy card and return it to the Transfer Agent in the accompanying pre- addressed envelope.
You can revoke your proxy before it is exercised at the meeting by:

delivering written notice of revocation of the proxy to our Secretary prior to the Annual Meeting;

executing and delivering a later dated proxy card to our Secretary; or

attending and voting electronically at the Annual Meeting.
Beneficial Owners
Before the Meeting:
Have your voting instructions form available and access www.cstproxyvote.com then follow the prompts to vote your shares.
During the Meeting:
After obtaining a legal proxy from your broker, bank or other nominee and then after properly registering, you may enter the Annual Meeting by logging in at https://www.viewproxy.com/Primoris/2024/vm using the password you received via the registration confirmation email and the virtual control number assigned to you in the registration confirmation email.
You can then vote via the link provided during the Annual Meeting while the polls are open. You will need your virtual control number assigned to you in the registration confirmation email.
Please follow the instructions provided by your broker, bank or nominee. You may vote by mail by completing, signing and dating the voting instruction card provided by your broker, bank or nominee and mailing the card to such entities in the accompanying pre-addressed envelopes.You may submit new voting instructions by contacting your broker, bank or other nominee. You may also vote at the Annual Meeting.
[MISSING IMAGE: tm212391d2-icon_electricpn.jpg]
CORPORATE
PROFILE
Built on a foundation of trust, we deliver a range of infrastructure services that power, connect, and enhance society. On projects spanning utility-scale solar, renewables, power delivery, communications, and transportation infrastructure, we offer unmatched value to our clients, a safe and entrepreneurial culture to our employees, and innovation and excellence to our communities.

2   |   PRIMORIS2024 PROXY STATEMENT

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Proxy Statement Summary
[MISSING IMAGE: tm212391d2-icon_solarpn.jpg]
OUR
HISTORY
The Company’s roots go back to 1960 with the founding of ARB, Inc., a Bakersfield, California, pipeline construction company. ARB, Inc. met the growing demand for energy infrastructure that accompanied the mid-century oil boom in the west and quickly established a reputation for great quality and reliability. ARB, Inc.’s work and reputation fueled significant growth and laid the foundation for Primoris, which is today one of the largest infrastructure contractors in the country.
Primoris was formed in 2003 and it became a Delaware public company in July 2008 when it merged with a special purpose acquisition company (a non-operating shell company). Since that time, the Company has grown organically and through strategic acquisitions, which has allowed it to expand its service capabilities and geographic footprint. Primoris trades on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) under the ticker symbol PRIM.
[MISSING IMAGE: tm212391d2-icon_safetypn.jpg]
OUR
PEOPLE
Because Primoris believes that its employees are the most valuable resource in successfully completing its projects, the Company employs a dynamic mix of people to create the strongest company possible. As of December 31, 2023, Primoris employed 2,773 salaried employees and 11,285 hourly employees. (The total number of hourly personnel employed varies based on the volume of work in progress.)
One of Primoris’ core values is to provide a safe and healthy workplace for its people. Safety, industrial hygiene, and loss prevention are the direct responsibility of all members of management, and employees receive the appropriate training, equipment, and other resources necessary to complete assigned tasks in a safe and efficient manner. Primoris prides itself on workplace safety. Total Recordable Incident Rate (“TRIR”) tracks the total number of workplace safety incidents, reported as the number of workplace safety incidents per 100 full-time workers during a one-year period. For the year ended December 31, 2023, the Company’s TRIR was 0.46, compared to an industry average of 2.4 per the most recent U.S. Bureau of Labor construction industry statistics.

2024 PROXY STATEMENTPRIMORIS   |   3

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Proxy Statement Summary
2023 Business Highlights
Primoris experienced another solid year in 2023, delivering revenue growth for the eighth consecutive year and backlog growth for a third consecutive year. The Company’s revenue for 2023 was $5.7 billion, which was up more than 29% from the previous year, driven by strong growth in both the Utilities and Energy segments.
Our Utilities segment grew both Master Service Agreement (“MSA”) and non-MSA revenue during the year due to the acquisition of PLH Group, Inc. (“PLH”) in August of 2022 and an increased focus on performing more transmission and substation project work. Gross profit margins were slightly lower than the previous year as we experienced some higher costs on projects inherited from PLH and continued to update certain contracts to current market rates. Our Energy segment had another robust year of renewables growth for utility-scale solar projects and a recovery in pipeline activity compared to 2022.
During the year we were awarded almost $7.5 billion of work which resulted in ending the year with $10.9 billion of total backlog, an increase of approximately 20 percent from the year end of 2022. This includes a fixed backlog of $5.2 billion and a master service agreement (“MSA”) backlog of $5.7 billion. These awards came across many of our businesses and have positioned the Company well for growth in 2024.
The Company’s full year net income was $126.1 million, or $2.33 per fully diluted share, a slight decline from the previous year due to higher interest expense and effective tax rate. The higher interest expense was a result of higher average debt balances from our acquisition of PLH and rising interest rates. The higher tax expense was due to tax benefits recognized on capital losses in 2022 and the expiration in 2023 of a temporary law allowing full deductibility of per diem expenses in 2021 and 2022. However, operating income increased almost 30 percent to $253.1 million and cash flow from operations increased to nearly $200 million in 2023.
[MISSING IMAGE: tb_overview-bw.jpg]
»
Record revenue for the eighth consecutive year, up 29 percent from 2022 to $5.7 billion
»
Closed 2023 with record backlog for the third consecutive year, an increase of approximately 20 percent from 2022 to $10.9 billion
»
Strong safety performance year with total recordable incident rate of 0.46, well below industry average of 2.4
»
Rapidly growing utility scale solar engineering, procurement and construction franchise with approximately $1.8 billion in announced projects in 2023
»
Cash flow from operations of $198 million

4   |   PRIMORIS2024 PROXY STATEMENT

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Proxy Statement Summary
Our Compensation Highlights
The goal of our compensation program is to align compensation so that the entire management team is committed to the Company’s corporate objectives of achieving both near- and long-term profitable growth without encouraging or rewarding excessive risk taking.
[MISSING IMAGE: tm212391d2-icon_checkmarkpn.jpg]
What We Do Have

Performance-based cash and equity incentives

Executive compensation based on performance of corporate objectives

Clawback compensation in the event of an accounting restatement

Stock ownership guidelines for executive officers and Directors

Independent compensation consultant engaged by the Compensation Committee

All Directors on the Compensation Committee are independent
[MISSING IMAGE: tm212391d2-icon_crossmarkbw.jpg]
What We Don’t Have

No additional retirement benefits are afforded our executives that are not provided to all employees

No speculative transactions are allowed amongst Directors and executive officers

No excessive perquisites

No strict benchmarking of compensation to a specific percentile of our peer group
Annual Incentive Plan
The Company’s annual incentive plan for senior leadership and executives is designed to provide annual awards payable in cash based on the performance award formula below:
Performance Award Formula
[MISSING IMAGE: fc_performance-pn.jpg]

2024 PROXY STATEMENTPRIMORIS   |   5

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Proxy Statement Summary
Corporate Governance Highlights
We believe that good corporate governance practices enable us to meet financial, operational, and strategic objectives, while advancing the long-term interests of our stockholders and promoting accountability and responsiveness amongst the Board and corporate management team.
[MISSING IMAGE: tm212391d2-icon_checkmarkpn.gif]
Separate CEO and Chairman of the Board roles
[MISSING IMAGE: tm212391d2-icon_checkmarkpn.gif]
Succession Planning Process
[MISSING IMAGE: tm212391d2-icon_checkmarkpn.gif]
All committees are chaired by an independent director
[MISSING IMAGE: tm212391d2-icon_checkmarkpn.gif]
Stock Ownership Guidelines for Directors and Officers
[MISSING IMAGE: tm212391d2-icon_checkmarkpn.gif]
Annual Board and Committee Evaluation
[MISSING IMAGE: tm212391d2-icon_checkmarkpn.gif]
Clawback Policy
[MISSING IMAGE: tm212391d2-icon_checkmarkpn.gif]
No interlocking relationships exist between members of our Board and members of any other board
[MISSING IMAGE: tm212391d2-icon_checkmarkpn.gif]
Mandatory Board retirement age of 75
[MISSING IMAGE: tm212391d2-icon_checkmarkpn.gif]
Board Risk Oversight
[MISSING IMAGE: tm212391d2-icon_checkmarkpn.gif]
Corporate code of conduct
Proposed Board Overview
IndependenceTenureAgeGender and Ethnic
Diversity
[MISSING IMAGE: tm212391d2-pc_independentpn.jpg]
[MISSING IMAGE: pc_tenure-pn.jpg]
[MISSING IMAGE: pc_ageage-pn.jpg]
[MISSING IMAGE: pc_diverse-pn.jpg]
The following table provides summary information about each Director nominee.
COMMITTEES
Director and
Principal Occupation
AgeDirector
Since
AuditCompensationNominating
and
Corporate
Governance
Strategy
and
Risk
Michael E. Ching
Former Global Head of Investment Research practice, Evalueserve
612022MM
Stephen C. Cook (Lead Independent Director)
President and principal stockholder, Fieldstone
Partners
742008MMM
David L. King (Chairman of the Board)
Former Chief Executive Officer, Primoris Services Corporation
712015
Carla S. Mashinski
Former Chief Financial Officer, Cameron LNG
612019CM
Terry D. McCallister
Former Chief Executive Officer,
Chairman WGL Holdings, Inc. and Washington Gas
682020CM
Thomas E. McCormick
President and Chief Executive Officer, Primoris Services Corporation
612019
Jose R. Rodriguez
Former Senior Audit Partner, KPMG LLP
652021MM
John P. Schauerman
Former Chief Financial Officer, Primoris Services Corporation
672016MC
Patricia K. Wagner
Former Group President of the United States Utilities
Sempra Energy
612020CM
C = Chair
M = Member

6   |   PRIMORIS2024 PROXY STATEMENT

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Proxy Statement Summary
Corporate Responsibility Highlights
Primoris Services Corporation (“Primoris” or the “Company”) believes that proactive oversight of Corporate Responsibility matters can improve a company’s internal performance as well as have a positive impact on its relationship with all stakeholders—employees, customers, investors, suppliers, and communities.
In 2023 Primoris conducted a Materiality Assessment(1) to ascertain what Corporate Responsibility topics are the most important to our stakeholders and our business.
The purpose of the materiality assessment is to engage internal and external stakeholders on corporate responsibility topics. The findings will allow Primoris to focus on the most meaningful Corporate Responsibility initiatives that will provide maximum impact to the Company’s constituents.
The assessment consisted of three phases: 1) benchmarking, analysis of trends and identification of topics and definitions; 2) interviews with key stakeholders and 3) in-depth analysis and summary of findings.
The list of 20 topics were identified by reviewing peer materiality assessments and sustainability reports, emerging topics, leading Corporate Responsibility reporting frameworks, topics raised as important to stakeholders through other formal and informal engagements, the Company’s Corporate Responsibility strategy and reporting, and topics raised by internal subject matter experts.
The stakeholders engaged were our Board of Directors, executive management team, employees, customers, investors, and suppliers.
Issues were weighted, prioritized, and plotted on the following Materiality Assessment Map according to their relative degree of importance. It is important to note that all issues on the map, regardless of where they fall, are relevant to the Company. We identified 20 topics that are important to our stakeholders, and of these, ten emerged as the most relevant:
Occupational Health and Safety [MISSING IMAGE: ic_circlered-4c.jpg]Enterprise Risk Management [MISSING IMAGE: ic_circleblue-4c.jpg]
Ethics and Integrity [MISSING IMAGE: ic_circleblue-4c.jpg]Human Rights [MISSING IMAGE: ic_circleblue-4c.jpg]
Corporate Culture [MISSING IMAGE: ic_circlered-4c.jpg]Data Security and Privacy [MISSING IMAGE: ic_circleblue-4c.jpg]
Supporting the Energy Transition [MISSING IMAGE: ic_circlegreen-4c.jpg]Labor Relations [MISSING IMAGE: ic_circlered-4c.jpg]
Employee Attraction, Development, and Retention [MISSING IMAGE: ic_circlered-4c.jpg]Supply Chain Management [MISSING IMAGE: ic_circleblue-4c.jpg]
[MISSING IMAGE: fc_materiality-4c.jpg]
(1)
The discussion of materiality or significance, including discussion of material or significant Corporate Responsibility matters as determined in connection with the Materiality Assessment, is not an indication that such information, topics, matters, or issues are material or significant to Primoris’ investors as such terms are defined or construed under the federal securities laws or pursuant to disclosure or reporting requirements under the rules and regulations of the SEC.

2024 PROXY STATEMENTPRIMORIS   |   7

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Proxy Statement Summary
Primoris is proud of our record on Corporate Responsibility issues. We formalized our focus on these areas in 2020 with the formation of a Corporate Responsibility Committee with the support of our Board of Directors and management team. During 2023, we made progress in several areas.
[MISSING IMAGE: tm212391d2-icon_environmpn.jpg]
SUSTAINABILITY
We are committed to reducing or eliminating negative environmental impacts wherever practicable. More than that, we are actively seeking projects that contribute to a lower-carbon future. In 2023, this included $1.8 billion in new solar projects announced with targeted completions over the next few years. These awards helped us to finish the year with approximately $2.4 billion in solar backlog that have us well-positioned to continue growth in utility-scale solar construction. In addition, we have taken on several projects that support the production of biofuels and are working with clients to explore options in hydrogen and carbon capture technology, which are expected to play a role in lowering greenhouse gas emissions.
In terms of our own environmental impacts, we have implemented energy-efficient technology in many of our facilities and employ a sustainability framework that helps our renewables customers track and measure the environmental impact of projects.
Supporting the
Energy Transition
$1.8Bn
in new solar project
awards announced
$2.4Bn
in new solar projects
at year-end 2023

8   |   PRIMORIS2024 PROXY STATEMENT

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Proxy Statement Summary
[MISSING IMAGE: tm212391d2-icon_socialpn.jpg]
COMMUNITY
Our primary social responsibility focus areas include Occupational Health and Safety and Corporate Culture. Focusing on employee programs that address wellness, prosperity and quality of life creates a rewarding, engaging and inclusive workplace.
Safety, Health and Wellness. We are committed to the safety, health and wellness of our employees, and we pride ourselves on workplace safety. We track and maintain several key safety metrics, which senior management reviews monthly, and we evaluate management on their ability to provide safe working conditions on job sites and to create a strong safety culture. Lost Time Injury Rate (“LTIR”) tracks the rate of injuries in the workplace which results in the employee having to take a minimum of one full working day away from work. For the year ended December 31, 2023, our LTIR rate was 0.07 compared to an industry average of 1.0 per the most recent U.S. Bureau of Labor construction industry statistics. Total Recordable Incident Rate (“TRIR”) tracks the total number of workplace injuries which rise to the level of Occupational Safety and Health Administration recordability, whether leading to time away from work or not. TRIR is reported as the number of workplace safety incidents per 100 full-time workers during a one-year period. For the year ended December 31, 2023, our TRIR rate was 0.46 compared to an industry average of 2.4 per the most recent U.S. Bureau of Labor construction industry statistics.
Compensation and Benefits. As part of our compensation philosophy, we believe that we must offer and maintain market competitive total rewards programs for our employees in order to attract and retain superior talent. Our compensation programs are generally designed to align employee compensation with market practices and our performance. With respect to our executive officers, business unit management, and other senior leadership, compensation programs consist of both fixed and variable components. The fixed portion is generally set at market levels, with variable compensation designed to reward employees based on Company and individual performance. In connection with these compensation programs, we grant stock-based compensation to management and key personnel at the business unit levels, which we believe helps to align incentives throughout our organization.
We also provide additional benefits to our non-union employees, including a Company matched 401(k) Plan, healthcare and insurance benefits, health savings and flexible spending accounts, paid time off, family leave, deferred compensation plan, employee stock purchase plan and employee assistance programs.
Professional and Career Development. We strive to develop and sustain a skilled labor advantage by providing thorough on-and off-site training programs, project management training, and leadership development programs. We have Company-owned training facilities that support continuous skills training, including several locations where we train electric apprentices to become journeymen. We offer multiple levels of leadership programs designed to meet the needs of our employees and support the development of best-in-class talent. Our five cornerstone programs are Foreman Foundations, Extreme Ownership, Hunt for Leadership Success, Next Level Leadership, and The Leadership Experience. From Foreman Foundations where employees learn the fundamentals of transitioning from a crew member to a crew leader through The Leadership Experience where emerging leaders explore values-based leadership and sharpen their strategic leadership skills, our Learning and Development programs are designed to support Primoris’ vision, mission, and values and promote the growth of our greatest assets, our employees.
0.07
Lost Time Injury Rate (“LTIR”)
0.46
Total Recordable
Incident Rate (“TRIR”)
[MISSING IMAGE: lg_viva-4clr.jpg]
46%
of the overall workforce
identified as racial minority
12%
of the overall workforce
identified as female
2,900
vendors recognized as diverse
7
employee resource
groups including
Primoris Veterans
[MISSING IMAGE: lg_veterans-4clr.jpg]

2024 PROXY STATEMENTPRIMORIS   |   9

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Proxy Statement Summary
[MISSING IMAGE: tm212391d2-icon_socialpn.jpg]
COMMUNITY
Diversity and Inclusion. Our Employee Resource Groups, within the Primoris workforce, promote diversity and inclusion throughout our organization and within the industry. These groups allow our employees to come together based on shared characteristics or life experiences to raise awareness of historically underrepresented employee groups, enhance personal and professional development, create community, and contribute to our vision and values. We have standardized diversity and anti-harassment training across business units and are now tracking female and minority representation across the organization.
Diversity is an important factor in our procurement and subcontracting decision-making. We maintain a Supplier Diversity database that provides the information to manage our ongoing relationship development with small and diverse companies. Our proactive approach includes developing key suppliers and creating strategic alliances with various Diverse Business Enterprise suppliers. Our approach increases diversity while creating long-term value for the supply chain and our core business. We currently work with 2,900 diverse vendors, representing 17% of our total third party spend.

10   |   PRIMORIS2024 PROXY STATEMENT

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Proxy Statement Summary
[MISSING IMAGE: tm212391d2-icon_governanpn.jpg]
GOVERNANCE
A governance refresh undertaken in 2019 included publication of our Corporate Governance Guidelines and Code of Conduct. Additional actions taken by the Board included Board declassification, establishment of a mandatory Board retirement age of 75, creation of a director stock ownership requirement, and prohibition of hedging and short-selling with Primoris stock.
Primoris has a multi-layered cybersecurity risk management program designed to identify and mitigate cyber risks to protect our proprietary information and ensure the trust of our customers and employees. We have several layers of protections in place, all overseen by our Security Steering Committee (“SSC”), with regular updates to the Executive Leadership Team, our Audit Committee, and our Board of Directors. The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors has compliance oversight for matters of Information Technology security risks including cybersecurity risks. The Audit Committee is briefed quarterly by our Chief Information Officer (“CIO”) on our cybersecurity program, and both the Audit Committee and SSC are notified between such updates regarding significant new cybersecurity threats or incidents. The full Board of Directors also receives regular reports from the Audit Committee.
Primoris’ cybersecurity efforts are designed to ensure the safety and security of its customers and employees. The CIO chairs the SSC and oversees Primoris’ cybersecurity risk management program. The CIO is directly supported by the head of cybersecurity with relevant expertise and experience. The CIO and head of cybersecurity lead the strategy, establish the policies and maintain awareness of threats and vulnerabilities on an ongoing basis to prepare Primoris to address cybersecurity risks. Further, they educate employees regarding cybersecurity using security awareness training, security bulletins and phishing simulations to reinforce training on a quarterly basis. The Company’s Acceptable Use Policy (“AUP”) is distributed annually to employees for understanding and acknowledgement. The AUP and cybersecurity training are both made available to all network users through an online training portal.
The National Institute of Science and Technology (“NIST”) Cybersecurity Framework with a Capability Maturity Model Integration overlay is the basis of the Company’s cybersecurity program and determines its maturity. On a regular basis Primoris conducts vulnerability scans and penetration testing and works with multiple third parties to perform yearly baseline assessments of the cyber program that measures improvement and evaluates the Company’s incident response plan and related solutions. The assessment findings are then disclosed to the Audit Committee and SSC to identify areas for improvement and devise related action plans.
In recent years, the Company also expanded and made updates to several of its corporate governance policies including its Code of Conduct and Human Rights Policy to include language on our Modern Slavery and Human Rights Trafficking Policy, its Security Steering Committee Charter and its Enterprise Risk Management Charter, all of which are available on the Company’s website.
6.2 years
average tenure of
Primoris Board members
78%
of Directors are
Independent
100%
of Committees are chaired
by independent Directors

2024 PROXY STATEMENTPRIMORIS   |   11

TABLE OF CONTENTS
PROPOSAL 1 – ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

General Information
What am I being asked to vote on?
You are being asked to vote to elect nine Directors to hold office for a one-year term. The experience and qualifications of each Director nominee is included in the biographies in this section.
Each director of the Company’s Board is elected annually to serve a term of one-year. Seven of our current Directors are independent Directors as determined under the guidelines for director independence set forth in our Corporate Governance Guidelines and under all applicable NYSE guidelines.
The Company has a mandatory Board retirement policy in its Corporate Governance Guidelines which requires that no person older than 75 years may be appointed to or nominated for a Director position. The Company has no current members who meet these criteria.
The Board of Directors’ Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee recommended to the Board the nomination of each of the Director nominees for election as Directors for one-year terms expiring at the 2025 Annual Meeting, or until their successors are qualified and elected or their earlier death, resignation or removal. These recommendations were adopted unanimously by the Board. If the nominees become unavailable for any reason, or if any vacancy occurs before the election at the 2025 Annual Meeting (although we know of no reason to anticipate that this will occur), the proxies may be voted for such substitute nominees as the Board may designate.
Each nominee has consented to being mailednamed in this Proxy Statement and made available electronically (on our Company website at www.prim.com )has agreed to stockholdersserve if elected. If a quorum is present and entitled to vote on or about April 11, 2016, is being sent to you bythe election of Directors, the nominees receiving a plurality of the votes cast will be elected as Directors. Abstentions and broker non-votes have no effect on the result of the vote; however, abstentions and broker non-votes will be counted as shares present for purposes of determining the presence of a quorum.
Recommendation of the Board of Directors (the “Board”)
[MISSING IMAGE: tm212391d2-icon_checkmarkpn.jpg]
Our Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR the election of each of the nine Director nominees as Directors to hold office until our annual meeting of stockholders to be held in 2025 or until their respective successors are duly elected and qualified or upon their earlier death, resignation or removal.

12   |   PRIMORIS2024 PROXY STATEMENT

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Proposal 1 – Election of Primoris Services Corporation in connection with our 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”). Directors
Information Regarding Director Nominees
The Annual Meeting will take place at 9:00 a.m. Central Time, on Tuesday, May 3, 2016,following table sets forth information regarding each Director nominee up for election at the Rosewood Crescent Hotel, located at 400 Crescent Court, Dallas, Texas 75201. YouAnnual Meeting. There are cordially invited to attend the Annual Meeting and are requested to vote on the proposals described in this Proxy Statement.

Purposeno family relationships among any Directors, nominees or named executive officers of the Annual Meeting

AtCompany. To our knowledge, there are no material proceedings to which any Director or executive officer is a party adverse to the Annual Meeting, our stockholdersCompany or has a material interest adverse to the Company.

NamePosition with our CompanyAgeDirector Since
Michael E. ChingIndependent Director612022
Stephen C. CookIndependent Lead Director742008
David L. KingDirector and Chairman of the Board712015
Carla S. MashinskiIndependent Director612019
Terry D. McCallisterIndependent Director682020
Thomas E. McCormickDirector, President and Chief Executive Officer612019
Jose R. RodriguezIndependent Director652021
John P. SchauermanIndependent Director672016
Patricia K. WagnerIndependent Director612020
The person named in the enclosed proxy card will vote to elect two Class Beach of the Director nominees as Directors, unless you withhold this authority to vote for the election of any or all of the nominees by marking the proxy to that effect.
Director Nominee Highlights
[MISSING IMAGE: pc_dirhigh-pn.jpg]

2024 PROXY STATEMENTPRIMORIS   |   13

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Proposal 1 – Election of Directors
Director Nominees’ Skills and Experience
Our Board selected the nominees based on their diverse set of skills and experiences, which align with our business strategy and contribute to the effective oversight of Primoris.
Core Qualifications Possessed by all Director Nominees
100%
Highest Integrity
100%
Executive Leadership
100%
Business Acumen
Directors with Additional Skills and Experience
[MISSING IMAGE: tb_director-pn.jpg]
We believe that our Board should consist of individuals reflecting the diversity represented by our employees, customers, and communities in which we operate. The below table provides information related to the composition of our Board members and nominees.
Board Diversity Matrix (As of March 22, 2024)
Total Number of Directors: 9FemaleMaleNon-BinaryDid Not
Disclose
Gender
Part I: Gender Identity
Directors2700
Part II: Demographic Background
African American or Black0000
Alaskan Native or Native American0000
Asian0100

14   |   PRIMORIS2024 PROXY STATEMENT

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Proposal 1 – Election of Directors
Total Number of Directors: 9FemaleMaleNon-BinaryDid Not
Disclose
Gender
Hispanic or Latinx0100
Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander0000
White2500
Two or More Races or Ethnicities0000
LGBTQ+0000
Did Not Disclose Demographics Background0000

2024 PROXY STATEMENTPRIMORIS   |   15

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Proposal 1 – Election of Directors
Director Nominees’ Biographies and Special Skills
[MISSING IMAGE: ph_michaeleching-4c.jpg]
AGE

61
DIRECTOR SINCE

2022
COMMITTEES

Audit

Strategy & Risk
MICHAEL E. CHING
Professional Experience
Michael Ching has over 35 years of experience in the investment banking and technology industries. He most recently served as Executive Vice President and Global Head of Evalueserve’s Investment Research practice from January 2022 to December 2023, where he led the effort to provide leading sell-side and buy-side research organizations with global talent and AI-driven products and solutions. From 2002 to 2019, he was a Managing Director and Deputy Head of Equities Research at UBS, where he helped manage a department of 150 equity research analysts and associates. Prior to that, Mr. Ching served as a ranked technology analyst at Merrill Lynch. He also worked at Bell Laboratories for nearly ten years as a District Manager and systems engineer focusing on data and fiber optic networks. He holds an M.B.A. from The Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania, an M.S. in Electrical Engineering from Stanford University, and a B.S. in Electrical Engineering from Rutgers University.
Reasons for Nomination
We believe that Mr. Ching’s qualifications to serve on our Board include his in-depth knowledge of capital markets, equities research, financial modeling and data analysis and his understanding of systems engineering. The Board has determined that Mr. Ching meets the SEC rules for independence and is therefore an independent Director.
[MISSING IMAGE: tb_michaelching-pn.jpg]
[MISSING IMAGE: ph_stephenccook-4clr.jpg]
AGE

74
DIRECTOR SINCE

2008
COMMITTEES

Audit

Nominating & Corporate
Governance

Strategy & Risk
STEPHEN C. COOK
Professional Experience
Stephen Cook has served as one of our Directors since July 2008 and in May 2010 was appointed by the Board as Lead Director of the Company. Since 1990 he has served as President and principal stockholder of Fieldstone Partners, a Houston, Texas-based investment banking firm focused primarily on corporate merger and acquisition advisory services. He has over 45 years of experience in the investment banking business, including 10 years with Rotan Mosle, Inc., a Texas-based regional investment firm and underwriter where he served as co-head of the corporate finance department and as a Director of the firm. Mr. Cook received a B.A. in Economics from Princeton University and an M.B.A. from Harvard Business School. Mr. Cook also serves on the Board of Alzeca Biosciences, Inc., Solid Surface Care, Inc. and BTU Research LLC, all privately held companies.
Reasons for Nomination
We believe that Mr. Cook’s qualifications to serve on our Board include his business and investment banking experience and his wealth of knowledge of mergers and acquisitions. The Board has determined that Mr. Cook meets the SEC rules for independence and is therefore an independent Director.
[MISSING IMAGE: tb_stephencook-pn.jpg]

16   |   PRIMORIS2024 PROXY STATEMENT

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Proposal 1 – Election of Directors
[MISSING IMAGE: ph_davidlking-4clr.jpg]
AGE

71
DIRECTOR SINCE

2015
DAVID L. KING
Professional Experience
David King has served as our Chairman since May 2019 and as one of our Directors since May 2015. He served as our Chief Executive Officer from August 2015 until November 2019, and also served as our President from August 2015 until April 2019. Prior to that, Mr. King was our Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer since March 2014. Prior to joining Primoris, Mr. King spent several years at Chicago Bridge & Iron (“CB&I”), a large NYSE listed construction company that was acquired by McDermott International, most recently as President of Lummus Engineered Products from 2013 to March 2014. From 2010 to 2013 he was President of CB&I Project Engineering & Construction based in The Hague, Netherlands responsible for worldwide operations. From 2009 to 2010 he was Group Vice President for Downstream Operations for CB&I Lummus located in The Woodlands, Texas. Mr. King also managed and helped establish the Global Services Group for CB&I in 2008. He has extensive Engineering, Procurement, Fabrication and Construction industry experience in energy-related projects, liquefied natural gas, offshore, pipelines, refining, petrochemicals, gas processing, oil sands, synthesis gas and gas-to-liquids. Recognized as NACD Directorship Certified by the National Association of Corporate Directors, Mr. King received his bachelor’s degree in Mechanical Engineering from Texas Tech University, an M.B.A. from the University of Texas, Tyler, and an Advanced Executive Management Degree from INSEAD in Fontainebleau, France.
[MISSING IMAGE: lg_nacddirect-bw.gif]
Reasons for Nomination
Mr. King has a wealth of knowledge and experience in the industry and our business and has an in-depth knowledge of our employees, culture, competitors and the effect on our business of various government policies. We believe that his history and experience demonstrate that Mr. King is well qualified to serve on our Board.
[MISSING IMAGE: tb_davidking-pn.jpg]

2024 PROXY STATEMENTPRIMORIS   |   17

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Proposal 1 – Election of Directors
[MISSING IMAGE: ph_carlasmashinski-4clr.jpg]
AGE

61
DIRECTOR SINCE

2019
COMMITTEES

Audit (Chair)

Compensation
CARLA S. MASHINSKI
Professional Experience
Carla Mashinski has served as one of our Directors since March 2019. Since July 2015, Ms. Mashinski served as Chief Financial Officer of Cameron LNG, a natural gas liquefaction terminal near the Gulf of Mexico; effective February 2017, her title was expanded to Chief Financial and Administrative Officer until her retirement in May 2022. From 2014 to July 2015, she served as Chief Financial Officer and Vice President of Finance and Information Management for the North America Operation of SASOL, an international integrated energy company. From 2008 to 2014, Ms. Mashinski was employed by SBM Offshore, Inc., a provider of leased floating production systems for the offshore energy industry, serving as Vice President of Finance and Administration, U.S. Chief Financial Officer from 2008 to February 2014, and as Commercial and Contracts Manager from February to August 2014. She served as Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer and Controller of Gulfmark Offshore from 2004 to 2008. Prior to that, Ms. Mashinski held various finance and accounting positions for Duke Energy (1999-2004) and Shell Oil Company (1985-1998) or its affiliated companies. Ms. Mashinski is a certified public accountant, certified management accountant, and a certified project management professional with a B.S. degree in accounting from the University of Tennessee, Knoxville and an Executive M.B.A. from the University of Texas, Dallas.
Recognized as NACD Directorship Certified by the National Association of Corporate Directors, Ms. Mashinski also serves on the Board of BKV Corporation, a privately held natural gas exploration and production company that seeks to deliver reliable, sustainable energy. On January 1, 2024, Carla was appointed to the Board of Ranger Energy Services (NYSE:RNGR), a provider of high specification mobile rig well services, cased hole wireline services and ancillary services in the U.S. oil and gas industry, where she will serve as the audit Committee chair and Nominating & Governance Committee member. She previously served on the Boards of Unit Corporation (NYSE:UNT), a U.S. based energy company engaged in oil and gas exploration and production, contract drilling, and gas gathering and processing and CARBO Ceramics a global technology company that provides products and services to the oil & gas and industrial markets.
[MISSING IMAGE: lg_nacddirect-bw.gif]
Reasons for Nomination
We believe that Ms. Mashinski’s qualifications to serve on our Board include her experience as a Director of various public companies, her accounting and financial expertise as a certified public accountant, certified management accountant, and project management professional, her executive level experience with corporate financial, human resources, and information management activities, and her industry experience in strategic planning, risk management, compensation, mergers and acquisitions, joint ventures, and financial leadership. The Board has determined that Ms. Mashinski meets the SEC rules for independence and is therefore an independent Director.
[MISSING IMAGE: tb_carlamashinski-pn.jpg]

18   |   PRIMORIS2024 PROXY STATEMENT

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Proposal 1 – Election of Directors
[MISSING IMAGE: ph_terrydmccallister-4clr.jpg]
AGE

68
DIRECTOR SINCE

2020
COMMITTEES

Nominating & Corporate
Governance (Chair)

Strategy & Risk
TERRY D. MCCALLISTER
Professional Experience
Terry McCallister has served as one of our Directors since July 2020. Mr. McCallister has a forty-year history in nearly all aspects of the energy sector, including utilities, pipelines, clean energy, and exploration and production endeavors. He was Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of WGL Holdings, Inc. and Washington Gas from 2009 until his retirement in 2018. Prior thereto, Mr. McCallister served as President and Chief Operating Officer of WGL and Washington Gas, joining Washington Gas in 2000 as Vice President of Operations. He has also held various leadership positions with Southern Natural Gas and Atlantic Richfield Company. Mr. McCallister has a B.S. in Engineering Management from the University of Missouri-Rolla and is a graduate of the University of Virginia’s Darden School of Business Executive Program.
Mr. McCallister previously served on the Board of AltaGas Ltd. (TO:ALA) from 2018 to 2022, where he was a member of the Environment, Health, and Safety Committee. His Board experience includes serving as the Chair of WGL Holdings prior to its being acquired in 2018. He has served on the National Petroleum Council, the American Gas Association, the Gas Technology Institute, and the Southern Gas Association and is a member of the Institute of Corporate Directors.
Reasons for Nomination
We believe that Mr. McCallister’s qualifications to serve on our Board include his experience as a director of various public companies and his in-depth knowledge of the energy industry. He also brings valuable senior leadership to the Board. The Board has determined that Mr. McCallister meets the SEC rules for independence and is therefore an independent Director.
[MISSING IMAGE: tb_terrymccallister-pn.jpg]
[MISSING IMAGE: ph_thomasemccormick-4clr.jpg]
AGE

61
DIRECTOR SINCE

2019
THOMAS E. MCCORMICK
Professional Experience
Thomas (Tom) McCormick has served as our President and Chief Executive Officer since November 2019 and has served as one of our Directors since August 2019. Mr. McCormick is responsible for the management, strategy, profitable growth and operations of the Company. He is focused on collaborating with leadership and the Board of Directors to establish, develop and implement Primoris’ mission, vision, strategy, objectives and policies. He was named President of the Company in April 2019 and became CEO in November of that same year, after joining the Company as Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer in April 2016. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. McCormick held a variety of executive positions with Chicago Bridge & Iron Company beginning in 2007. Such positions included President—Oil & Gas, Senior Vice President—Gas Processing & Oil Sands, Global Vice President—Downstream Operations and Vice President Operations. Prior to 2007, Mr. McCormick worked for more than 17 years at BE&K Engineering & Construction on a variety of heavy industrial projects. Mr. McCormick has a Bachelor of Science degree in Civil Engineering from Florida State University and an Advanced Executive Management Degree from INSEAD in Fontainebleau, France.
Reasons for Nomination
Mr. McCormick has extensive knowledge and experience in our industry and our business and has obtained an in-depth knowledge of our employees, culture, competitors and the effect on our business of various government policies. We believe that his history and experience demonstrate that Mr. McCormick is well qualified to serve on our Board.
[MISSING IMAGE: tb_thomasmcmormick-pn.jpg]

2024 PROXY STATEMENTPRIMORIS   |   19

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Proposal 1 – Election of Directors
[MISSING IMAGE: ph_joserrodriguez-4clr.jpg]
AGE

65
DIRECTOR SINCE

2021
COMMITTEES

Audit

Nominating & Corporate
Governance
JOSE R. RODRIGUEZ
Professional Experience
Jose Rodriguez has served as one of our Directors since May 2021. He is a retired senior audit partner from KPMG, where he served for over 25 years. During his career at KPMG he held various leadership positions, which included serving on its Board of Directors and as lead Director; chief operating officer of KPMG International’s global audit practice; office managing partner; leader of its Audit Committee Institute (ACI); east region professional practice partner and most recently ombudsman. As an audit partner, Mr. Rodriguez had extensive experience with large multinational companies and mid-size private and publicly held companies, with primary emphasis on industrial manufacturing; consumer markets (retail, automotive, and distribution concerns); pharmaceuticals; agribusiness; oil and gas and mergers and acquisitions. Additionally, Mr. Rodriguez is a NACD Fellow and has been included in NACD’s D-100 list, which recognizes the most influential people in and around the Boardroom.
Mr. Rodriguez currently serves on the Board of CareMax, Inc (Nasdaq:CMAX) since June 2021, where he is Chair of the Board, Chair of the Audit Committee and a member of the Compliance Committee. Mr. Rodriguez also currently serves on the Board of Popular, Inc (Nasdaq:BPOP) since June 2021, where he serves on the Audit Committee and Risk Committee.
Mr. Rodriguez serves on the Board of trustees of Marymount University; Board of Directors of Latin Corporate Directors Association (first Vice Chair), SECU Family House (Chair), the North Carolina Association of CPAs (Chair-elect), the Dean’s Advisory Council at the University of Miami Herbert School of Business (Chair) and the Business School Advisory Board at Wake Forest University. He is a certified public accountant (licensed in FL, NC and NY). Mr. Rodriguez received a B.B.A with a major in accounting from the University of Miami.
[MISSING IMAGE: lg_nacddirect-bw.gif]
Reasons for Nomination
We believe that Mr. Rodriguez’s qualifications to serve on our Board include his in-depth knowledge and understanding of generally accepted accounting principles, his experience in auditing and SEC reporting, mergers and acquisitions, understanding of the responsibilities and functions of audit committees and experience in shaping corporate governance strategy to drive long-term corporate value creation to enhance investor confidence. Mr. Rodriquez has four decades of expertise in driving innovative growth, aligning risk with strategy, and developing dynamic talent and the right culture to unlock the power of diversity, inclusion and equity. The Board determined that Mr. Rodriguez meets the SEC rules for independence and therefore would qualify as an Independent Director.
[MISSING IMAGE: tb_joserodriguez-pn.jpg]

20   |   PRIMORIS2024 PROXY STATEMENT

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Proposal 1 – Election of Directors
[MISSING IMAGE: ph_johnpschauerman-4clr.jpg]
AGE

67
DIRECTOR SINCE

2016
COMMITTEES

Compensation

Strategy & Risk (Chair)
JOHN P. SCHAUERMAN
Professional Experience
John Schauerman has served as one of our Directors since November 2016. He served as the Company’s Executive Vice President of Corporate Development from February 2009 to December 2012 and was responsible for developing and integrating Primoris’ overall strategic plan, including the evaluation and structuring of new business opportunities and acquisitions. Prior to that, Mr. Schauerman served as our Chief Financial Officer from February 2008 to February 2009. He also served as a Director of the Company from July 2008 to May 3, 2013 and as a Director of its predecessor entity, ARB, Inc. (“ARB”) from 1993 to July 2008. Mr. Schauerman joined ARB in 1993 as the Company’s Senior Vice President. Previously, he served as Senior Vice President of Wedbush Morgan Securities, Inc., a regional investment bank focused on financing activities for middle market companies (n/k/a Wedbush Securities, Inc.).
Mr. Schauerman has served on the Board of Directors of Ascent Industries Co (Nasdaq:ACNT) since June 2021. Mr. Schauerman also served on the Boards of Directors of MYR Group (Nasdaq:MYRG) from March 2016 through November 2016; Harmony Merger Corp. (Nasdaq:HRMNU), a blank check investment company, from March 2015 through July 2017, and Wedbush Securities, Inc., a leading financial services and investment firm, from August 2014 through February 2018. Mr. Schauerman is a member of the Dean’s Executive Board of the UCLA School of Engineering. Mr. Schauerman holds an M.B.A. in Finance from Columbia University, New York, and a B.S. in Electrical Engineering from the University of California, Los Angeles.
Reasons for Nomination
We believe that Mr. Schauerman’s qualifications to serve on our Board include his experience as a Director of various public companies, his experience as chief financial officer of a construction company, his wealth of knowledge of business systems and understanding of generally accepted accounting principles, experience in analyzing financial statements, understanding of internal control over financial reporting and his understanding and knowledge of public company rules and regulations. The Board determined that Mr. Schauerman meets the SEC rules for independence and is therefore an independent Director.
[MISSING IMAGE: tb_johnschauerman-pn.jpg]

2024 PROXY STATEMENTPRIMORIS   |   21

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Proposal 1 – Election of Directors
[MISSING IMAGE: ph_patriciakwagner-4clr.jpg]
AGE

61
DIRECTOR SINCE

2020
COMMITTEES

Compensation (Chair)

Strategy & Risk
PATRICIA K. WAGNER
Professional Experience
Patricia Wagner has served as one of our Directors since July 2020. Ms. Wagner has over thirty years of experience in the utility and industrial markets, with leadership experience at both the corporate and operating subsidiary level. She was Group President of U.S. utilities for Sempra Energy (NYSE:SRE) until her retirement in 2019. Her career with Sempra spanned nearly twenty-five years and included such leadership roles as Chief Executive Officer of SoCal Gas and Chief Executive Officer of Sempra U.S. Gas & Power, which included Sempra’s renewable energy infrastructure portfolio along with other infrastructure assets. She also held leadership roles in accounting, information technology, and audit. Prior to her time at Sempra, she held positions at Fluor, Allergan Pharmaceuticals, and American McGaw.
Ms. Wagner currently serves on the Boards of Apogee Enterprises, Inc. (Nasdaq:APOG), where she is the chair of the Compensation Committee and a member of the Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee, and of California Water Service Group (NYSE:CWT), where she is chair of the Finance and Investment Committee and is a member of the Audit Committee. Ms. Wagner holds a B.S. in Chemical Engineering from California Polytechnic State University and an M.B.A. from Pepperdine University.
Reasons for Nomination
We believe that Ms. Wagner’s qualification to serve on our Board include her experience as a Director of various public companies and her in-depth knowledge of regulated utilities and familiarity with the California regulatory environment. She also brings valuable accounting and finance, senior leadership, and operational experience to the Board. The Board has determined that Ms. Wagner meets the SEC rules for independence and is therefore an independent Director.
[MISSING IMAGE: tb_patriciawagner-pn.jpg]

22   |   PRIMORIS2024 PROXY STATEMENT

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROPOSAL 2 – TO APPROVE, IN AN ADVISORY, NON-BINDING VOTE, THE COMPANY’S NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION
General Information
What am I being asked to vote on?
You are being asked to vote on a non-binding, advisory resolution regarding the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers.
We believe that our compensation policies and procedures are competitive and strongly aligned with the long-term interest of our stockholders. This advisory stockholder vote, commonly known as “Say-on-Pay”, gives you as a stockholder the opportunity to express approval or withhold approval of the compensation we pay our named executive officers through voting for or against the following resolution:
“Resolved, that the stockholders approve the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers as disclosed in the Company’s 2024 proxy statement pursuant to the disclosure rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission (which disclosure includes the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the Summary Compensation Table and the other executive compensation tables and related discussions).”
The Company and the Compensation Committee remain committed to the compensation philosophy, policies and objectives outlined under the heading “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” in this proxy statement. The Compensation Committee will continue to review all elements of the executive compensation program and take any steps it deems necessary to continue to fulfill the objectives of the program.
Stockholders are encouraged to carefully review the “EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION” section of this proxy statement for a detailed discussion of the Company’s executive compensation program.
Because your vote is advisory, it will not be binding upon the Company or the Board of Directors. However, the Compensation Committee will take into account the outcome of the vote when considering future executive compensation arrangements.
Recommendation of the Board of Directors
[MISSING IMAGE: tm212391d2-icon_checkmarkpn.jpg]
Our Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR the approval of the advisory, non-binding proposal on the compensation of the Company’s named executive officers.

2024 PROXY STATEMENTPRIMORIS   |   23

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROPOSAL 3 – RATIFICATION OF SELECTION OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
General Information
What am I being asked to vote on?
You are being asked to vote to ratify the Audit Committee’s selection of Moss Adams LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2024.
We are asking the stockholders to ratify the appointmentAudit Committee’s selection of Moss Adams LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2016. In addition, management will report on our performance over2024. The firm is a registered public accounting firm with the last fiscal year and, followingPublic Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”), as required by the Annual Meeting, respond to questions from stockholders.

Materials provided

The Board sent you this Proxy StatementSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and the enclosed proxy cardrules of the PCAOB and has served as our auditor since 2006. In the event the stockholders fail to ratify the appointment, the Audit Committee will reconsider this appointment. If the appointment is ratified, the Audit Committee, in order to solicit your proxy to vote your sharesits discretion, may direct the appointment of a different independent registered public accounting firm at any time during the Annual Meeting. Asyear if the Audit Committee determines that such a stockholder, you are invitedchange would be in the best interests of the Company and our stockholders.

A Moss Adams LLP representative is expected to attend the meeting and are entitled to vote on the items of business described in this Proxy Statement.

2024 Annual Meeting attendance

All stockholders as of March 31, 2016 (the “Record Date”),the Stockholders. The representative will have an opportunity to make a statement if he or their duly appointed proxies, may attend the Annual Meeting. You may needshe desires to bring personal identification. Gaining admissiondo so and will be available to the Annual Meeting depends on how your stock ownership is recorded with our transfer agent, Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company (the “Transfer Agent”). If your stock is held in the namerespond to appropriate stockholder questions.

The affirmative vote of a bank, broker or other holder of record and you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, please obtain proof of ownership, such as a current brokerage account statement or certification from your broker. If your stock is registered directly in your name with our Transfer Agent, all you need is proof of identity; no proof of ownership is needed.

Voting at the Annual Meeting

Holders of our common stock (“Common Stock”) asmajority of the closeshares of business on the Record Date will beCommon Stock present, in person or by proxy, entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. On the Record Date, there were 51,772,497 shares of Common Stock outstanding, each of whichMeeting is entitled to one vote with respect to each matter to be voted on at the Annual Meeting. There is no stockholder statutory right of appraisal or dissent with respect to any matters to be voted on at the Annual Meeting.

Quorum requirement

The presence at the Annual Meeting, in person or by proxy, of the holders of a majority of the voting power of all outstanding shares of Common Stock entitled to vote shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of business. Proxies marked as abstaining (including proxies containing broker non-votes) on any matter to be acted upon by stockholders will be treated as present at the meeting for purposes of determining a quorum but will not be counted as votes cast on such matters.

Stockholder of record & beneficial owner

All stockholders are invited to attend the Annual Meeting. All shares that have been properly voted and not revoked will be voted at the Annual Meeting. Most of our stockholders hold their shares through a stockbroker, bank or other nominee rather than directly in their own name. As summarized below, there are distinctions between shares held of record and those owned beneficially.

Stockholder of Record

If your shares are registered directly in your name with the Transfer Agent, you are considered the stockholder of record, and these proxy materials are being sent directly to you by us. As the stockholder of record, you have the right to grant your voting proxy directly to us or to vote in person at the Annual Meeting. We have enclosed a proxy card for you to use.

Voting in person at the Annual Meeting — You may vote in person at the Annual Meeting. If you choose to do so, please bring the enclosed proxy card and proof of identification. Even if you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, we recommend that you vote your shares in advance as described below so that your vote will be counted if you later decide not to attend the Annual Meeting.

Voting without attending the Annual Meeting — Please complete and properly sign and date the accompanying proxy card and return it to the Transfer Agent in the accompanying pre-addressed envelope.

Changing your vote after returning your proxy card — You can revoke your proxy before it is exercised by:

·                  delivering written notice of revocation of the proxy to our Secretary prior to the Annual Meeting;

·                  executing and delivering a later dated proxy card to our Secretary; or

·                  attending and voting by ballot in person at the Annual Meeting.

Beneficial Owner of Shares

If your shares are held in a stock brokerage account, by a bank or other nominee, you are considered the beneficial owner of shares held in “street name” and these proxy materials are being forwarded to you by your broker, bank or nominee who is considered, with respect to those shares, the stockholder of record. As the beneficial owner, you have the right to direct the stockholder of record how to vote your shares. Your broker, bank or nominee has enclosed a voting instruction card for your use.

Voting in person at the Annual Meeting — You may vote in person at the Annual Meeting by obtaining a signed “legal proxy” from the record holder (e.g., your broker, bank or nominee) prior to the meeting.

Voting without attending the Annual Meeting — If you sign the accompanying proxy card and return it to the Transfer Agent, your shares will be voted as you direct on the proxy card. Please follow the instructions provided by your broker, bank or nominee. You may vote by mail by completing, signing and dating the voting instruction cards provided by your broker, bank or nominee and mailing them to such entities in the accompanying pre-addressed envelopes.

Changing your vote after returning your proxy card — You may submit new voting instructions by contacting your broker, bank or other nominee. You may also vote at the Annual Meeting by following the instructions as described above in Voting in person at the Annual Meeting.

Required votes to approve each item

Each outstanding share of Common Stock is entitled to one vote on each proposal at the Annual Meeting. All matters require the existence of a quorum at the Annual Meeting. All proposals require an affirmative vote of the majority of shares represented in person or by proxy.  Election of Directors is determined by plurality voting. The individual receiving the largest number of votes for each position will be elected.

In voting on Proposal 1, the election of Directors, you may vote “FOR” the nominee or your vote may be “WITHHELD” with respect to the nominee. A properly executed proxy marked “ABSTAIN” with respect to any other matter will not be voted, although it will be counted for purposes of determining whether there is a quorum. An abstention on Proposal 2 will have the effect of a negative vote on that matter. If you are a beneficial owner, shares represented by broker non-votes (when the broker indicates they do not have their customer’s direction on how to vote, nor has discretionary authority on how to vote) will be counted in determining whether there is a quorum but will not be counted as votes cast on any matter.

Inspector of elections

Our Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary, John M. Perisich, will act as Inspector of Elections and oversee the voting results. The Inspector of Elections will also determine the presence of a quorum.

Voting results of the Annual Meeting

We will announce preliminary voting results at the Annual Meeting and will publish final results in a Current Report on a Form 8-K filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) within four business days of the Annual Meeting.

Board recommendations

The Board recommends a vote:

·                  FOR Proposal No. 1 to elect each of the two Class B Directors.

·                  FOR Proposal No. 2required to ratify the appointmentselection of Moss Adams LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2024.

Recommendation of the Board of Directors
[MISSING IMAGE: tm212391d2-icon_checkmarkpn.jpg]
Our Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR the ratification of the selection of Moss Adams LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2024.

24   |   PRIMORIS2024 PROXY STATEMENT

TABLE OF CONTENTS
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE PRINCIPLES AND BOARD MATTERS

Our Board’s Mission. The Board of Directors is elected by the stockholders to oversee the stockholders’ interest in the long-term health and overall success of the business and its financial strength. The Board serves as the ultimate decision-making body of the Company, except for those matters reserved to or shared with the stockholders. The Board selects and oversees the members of executive management, who are charged by the Board with conducting the business of the Company.
We believe that effective corporate governance is an important element of our long-term success and ability to create value for our stockholders. Our Board periodically reviews our existing corporate governance policies and practices, as well as related provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, current and proposed rules of the SEC, and the corporate governance requirements of our principal listing exchange. Based on its review, the Board has approved charters, policies, procedures and controls that we believe promote and enhance our corporate governance, accountability and responsibility and promote a culture of honesty and integrity.
Charters for our Audit Committee, Compensation Committee, Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, and Strategy and Risk Committee, as well as our Corporate Governance Guidelines and Code of Conduct, are available on the Investor Relations section of our website at www.prim.com, and copies are available free of charge upon request to our Secretary at Primoris Services Corporation, 2300 N. Field Street, Suite 1900, Dallas, Texas 75201.
Corporate
Governance
Highlights
[MISSING IMAGE: tm212391d2-icon_checkmarkpn.jpg]
Declassified Board
[MISSING IMAGE: tm212391d2-icon_checkmarkpn.jpg]
Mandatory Retirement Age
[MISSING IMAGE: tm212391d2-icon_checkmarkpn.jpg]
Director Stock Ownership requirement
[MISSING IMAGE: tm212391d2-icon_checkmarkpn.jpg]
Prohibited hedging and short-selling with Primoris stock
[MISSING IMAGE: tm212391d2-icon_checkmarkpn.jpg]
Published Corporate Governance Guidelines and Code of Conduct
[MISSING IMAGE: tm212391d2-icon_checkmarkpn.jpg]
What We Do

Annual self-evaluation of Directors

Independent Lead Director

Fully independent Audit, Compensation, Nominating & Corporate Governance, and Strategy and Risk Committees

Annual election of Directors

Mandatory Director retirement age of 75

Stock ownership requirement for Directors

Clawback Policy for executive incentive-based compensation

Published Code of Conduct that applies to all Directors, officers, and employees

Published Corporate Governance Guidelines

Anti-bribery policy clearly outlined in Code of Conduct and Employee Handbook
[MISSING IMAGE: tm212391d2-icon_crossmarkbw.jpg]
What We Don’t Do

No Poison Pill

Anti-hedging policy prohibits hedging or short sale of Primoris stock

No gross-up of excise taxes

No defined benefit plan

No guaranteed minimum annual cash incentive payment

No excessive perquisites

2024 PROXY STATEMENTPRIMORIS   |   25

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Corporate Governance Principles and Board Matters
Board Independence
The listing standards of NYSE require that companies have a board of directors with at least a majority of independent directors. Determining director independence requires that the Board affirmatively determine that the director has no material relationship with us, either directly or as a partner, stockholder or officer of an organization that has a relationship with us.
To assist it in making independence determinations, the Board has adopted independence standards, which include the standards required by NYSE for independent Directors. In addition, as described in the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines, a Director will not be deemed to have a material relationship with the Company if the Director:

is an executive officer of another company which is indebted to the Company, or to which the Company is indebted, unless the total amount of either company’s indebtedness to the other is more than 1% of the total consolidated assets of the company he or she serves as an executive officer; or

serves as an officer, director or trustee of a tax-exempt organization, unless the Company’s discretionary contributions to such organization are more than the greater of $1 million or 2% of that organization’s consolidated gross revenues. The Company’s automatic matching of employee charitable contributions will not be included in the amount of the Company’s contributions for this purpose.
On the basis of the Board independence standards identified above, and such other factors as the Board may consider from time to time, the Board has affirmatively determined that Messrs. Ching, Cook, McCallister, Rodriguez, and Schauerman and Mss. Mashinski and Wagner are independent.
Board Structure and Committee Composition
The Board has: (i) an Audit Committee, (ii) a Compensation Committee, (iii) a Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and (iv) a Strategy and Risk Committee. The Board and its Committees meet throughout the year on a set schedule and also hold special meetings, both telephonically and in person, and act by written consent from time to time, as appropriate. During 2023, the Board held a total of five meetings, the Audit Committee held four meetings, the Compensation Committee held four meetings, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee held four meetings, and the Strategy and Risk Committee held four meetings. The independent Directors meet in executive session at meetings of the Board and Committees as necessary. All of the independent Directors met in executive session at meetings of the Board without any management members four times during 2023.
Separate
Chairman
and CEO
Roles
The Board has separate roles of Chairman and CEO, with Mr. King serving as our Non-Executive Chairman of the Board since November 2019, when Mr. McCormick became our CEO. In May 2010, Mr. Cook was appointed by the Board as the Lead Independent Director, responsible for chairing the Board meetings in the absence of the Chairman, chairing executive sessions of the independent Directors, acting as the principal liaison between the Chairman and the independent Directors and serving as the contact Director for stockholders. The Board believes it should have the flexibility to establish a leadership structure that works best for the Company at a particular time, and it reviews that structure from time to time, including in the context of changes in leadership. The Board is of the view that its current leadership structure best serves the objective of effective Board oversight of management at this time and allows Mr. McCormick to focus primarily on the operations and management of the Company, while leveraging Mr. King’s experience to lead the Board.
The Board and the Compensation Committee do not make decisions regarding an executive officer’s compensation in the presence of such executive officer. The compensation of our Chief Executive Officer and all other executive officers is recommended to the Board of Directors for approval by the Compensation Committee. The Board of Directors acts on the recommendations in a vote in which only independent Directors participate and which takes place during executive sessions of the independent, non-executive Board members.
Director nominees are identified and recommended for the Board of Director’s selection by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.
Each Director attended at least 75% of the meetings of the Board and the Committees of the Board, if any, on which they served during the periods for which they served as a Director during 2023.
The Company has a mandatory retirement policy in its Corporate Governance Guidelines which requires that no person older than 75 years may be appointed to or nominated for a Director position. The Company has no members standing for re-election who meet these criteria.

26   |   PRIMORIS2024 PROXY STATEMENT

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Corporate Governance Principles and Board Matters
The current members of the Board Committees are identified in the following table:
Director(1)
Audit
Committee
Compensation
Committee
Nominating and
Corporate
Governance
Committee
Strategy and
Risk Committee
Michael E. ChingMM
Stephen C. CookMMM
Carla S. MashinskiCM
Terry D. McCallisterCM
Jose R. RodriguezMM
John P. SchauermanMC
Patricia K. WagnerCM
1
Messrs. Ching, Cook, McCallister, Rodriguez, and Schauerman and Mss. Mashinski and Wagner are independent Directors.
C = Chair
M = Member

2024 PROXY STATEMENTPRIMORIS   |   27

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Corporate Governance Principles and Board Matters
Committees of the Board
Audit Committee
[MISSING IMAGE: ph_carlasmashinski-4clr.jpg]
Meetings: 4
Chair: Carla S. Mashinski
Other Members:
Michael E. Ching
Stephen C. Cook
Jose R. Rodriguez
Primary Role of this Committee:
The primary role of the Audit Committee is to oversee our accounting and financial reporting processes, internal control systems, independent auditor relationships and the audits of our financial statements, as well as cybersecurity oversight.
Key Responsibilities:

Selecting and hiring our independent registered public accounting firm

Evaluating the qualifications, independence and performance of our independent registered public accounting firm

Reviewing and approving the audit and non-audit services to be performed by our independent registered public accounting firm and determining whether the performance of such services is compatible with the accounting firm’s independence

Reviewing with management and our independent registered public accounting firm the annual and quarterly financial statements. On a quarterly basis, the independent Audit Committee members meet with the auditors without the presence of management. During these independent sessions, the Audit Committee and the auditors discuss, among other things, the acceptability of the Company’s accounting principles, critical accounting policies, critical accounting estimates, and any alternative treatments of financial information within generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (“GAAP”)

Overseeing the administration of management’s process for the design of, and reviewing the adequacy, implementation and effectiveness of our internal controls established for finance, accounting, legal compliance and ethics functions

Reviewing management’s assessment of internal control and steps taken to monitor and control our exposure to financial risk

Overseeing the administration of management’s process for reviewing the design, adequacy, implementation and effectiveness of our critical accounting and financial policies

Reviewing any significant deficiencies or material weaknesses in the design or operation of our internal control over financial reporting and any fraud involving management or other financial reporting personnel

Establishing procedures for the receipt, retention, and treatment of complaints regarding internal controls, accounting and any auditing matters including confidential submissions by our employees or others of concern regarding these matters

Overseeing and monitoring the integrity of our financial statements and earnings press releases (including non-GAAP information) and our compliance with legal and regulatory requirements as they relate to accounting matters in our financial statements

Reviewing the performance of our internal audit function and the scope and results of the annual internal audit plan

Considering policies with respect to risk assessment and risk management, including information technology security risks and cybersecurity risks

Reviewing and approving any material related party transactions

Reviewing and discussing any key issues related to information technology cybersecurity risks and management programs on a regular basis
The Audit Committee consists of four persons, all of whom are independent under applicable NYSE listing standards. Members of the Audit Committee must also satisfy additional SEC independence requirements, which provide that they may not accept directly or indirectly any consulting, advisory or other compensatory fee from the Company other than compensation in their capacity as a Director, or otherwise be an “affiliated person” of us. The Board has determined that Audit Committee members Ms. Mashinski (Chairperson) and Messrs. Ching, Cook, and Rodriguez all satisfy the applicable SEC independence requirements.
Audit Committee Financial Expert. The Board has also determined that Ms. Mashinski, Mr. Ching, and Mr. Rodriguez are the Audit Committee “financial experts” as defined under SEC rules and regulations.

28   |   PRIMORIS2024 PROXY STATEMENT

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Corporate Governance Principles and Board Matters
Compensation Committee
[MISSING IMAGE: ph_patriciakwagner-4clr.jpg]
Meetings: 4
Chair: Patricia K. Wagner
Other Members:
Carla S. Mashinski
John P. Schauerman
Primary Role of this Committee:
The primary role of the Compensation Committee is to monitor and assist the Board in determining compensation for our executive officers and Directors.
Key Responsibilities:

Reviewing the goals and objectives of our executive compensation programs and recommending to the Board any changes to these goals and objectives

Reviewing our executive compensation plans including incentive, equity based and benefit plans, and recommending to the Board the adoption of new plans or amendments to existing plans

Evaluating annually the performance of the Chief Executive Officer and recommending to the independent members of the Board his or her compensation level based on this evaluation

Evaluating annually the performance of the other executive officers of the Company and its subsidiaries and recommending to the independent members of the Board the compensation level of each based on this evaluation

Reviewing and recommending to the independent members of the Board, concurrently with the Board’s Audit Committee, any employment, severance or termination arrangements made with any executive officer of the Company or its subsidiaries

Evaluating the appropriate level and types of compensation for Board and Committee service by non-employee Directors and recommending any changes to the Board

Periodically discussing with management the development, implementation and effectiveness of the Company’s policies and strategies relating to its human capital management function, including but not limited to those policies and strategies regarding diversity, equity and inclusion, and talent management
The members of the Compensation Committee of the Board are Mss. Wagner (Chairperson) and Mashinski and Mr. Schauerman. All of the members of the Compensation Committee meet the independence requirements of applicable NYSE listing standards.
The Compensation Committee monitors and assists the Board in determining compensation for our executive officers and Directors. The Board and the Compensation Committee do not make decisions regarding an executive officer’s compensation in the presence of such executive officer. After the Compensation Committee analyzes compensation issues related to our Chief Executive Officer and other executive officers, it makes a recommendation to the Board’s independent Directors for determination by independent Directors in a vote in which only independent Directors participate.
The Compensation Committee has the power to form subcommittees for any purpose that it deems appropriate and may delegate to such subcommittee such power and authority as the Compensation Committee may deem appropriate, provided it does not delegate to a subcommittee any power or authority required by any law, regulation or listing standard to be exercised by the Compensation Committee as a whole. The Compensation Committee may consider the recommendations of our Chief Executive Officer in determining the level of compensation of the executive officers of the Company and its subsidiaries. The Compensation Committee has the authority to retain such independent consultants or advisers as it deems necessary and appropriate, including compensation consultants, to advise it with respect to amounts or forms of executive or Director compensation, and may rely on the integrity and advice of any such advisers. The Compensation Committee also has the sole authority to retain a compensation consultant to assist it in carrying out its responsibilities, including the sole authority to approve the consultant’s fees and other retention terms, such fees to be borne by us, and to terminate any such consultant.
The Compensation Committee engaged Pay Governance, LLC (“Pay Governance”) as its independent advisor beginning in 2012. Prior to their engagement, Pay Governance did not perform any services for the Company. The Compensation Committee considered independence factors under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (“Dodd-Frank”) and NYSE rules and concluded that the work performed by Pay Governance did not present any conflicts of interest. As requested by the Compensation Committee, from time to time Pay Governance has advised and consulted with the Compensation Committee on compensation issues, compensation design and trends, and has kept the Compensation Committee apprised of regulatory, legislative, and accounting developments and competitive practices related to executive compensation. Pay Governance reviews compensation levels, trends and practices at the discretion of the Compensation Committee. Pay Governance does not determine the exact amount or form of executive compensation for any executive officers. See “EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION—Compensation Discussion and Analysis”. Pay Governance reports directly to the Compensation Committee, and a representative of Pay Governance, when requested, attends meetings of the Compensation Committee, is available to participate in executive sessions and communicates directly with the Compensation Committee Chair or its members outside of meetings. Pay Governance does no other work for the Company.

2024 PROXY STATEMENTPRIMORIS   |   29

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Corporate Governance Principles and Board Matters
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
During 2023, Mss. Wagner and Mashinski and Mr. Schauerman served on our Compensation Committee. No interlocking relationship exists between any member of our Board or any of our executive officers and any executive officer or member of the Board of Directors or Compensation Committee (or other Board Committee performing equivalent functions) of any other company, nor has any such interlocking relationship existed in the past.
Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
[MISSING IMAGE: ph_terrydmccallister-4clr.jpg]
Meetings: 4
Chair: Terry D. McCallister
Other Members:
Stephen C. Cook
Jose R. Rodriguez
Primary Role of this Committee:
The primary role of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is to assist the Board by identifying individuals qualified to become Directors consistent with criteria established by the Board.
Key Responsibilities:

Evaluating the composition, size and governance of the Board and its Committees and making recommendations regarding future planning and the appointment of Directors to Committees of our Board

Administering a policy for evaluating and considering nominees for election to the Board

Supporting the succession planning and talent development for succession candidates

Reviewing succession plans and management development programs for members of executive management and the CEO and providing reports on the progress of the succession planning and management development to the Board

Overseeing the evaluation of our Board as a whole

Reviewing our corporate governance principles and providing recommendations to the Board regarding possible changes

Developing and reviewing our Code of Conduct and assuring that it is appropriate for us

Overseeing the Company’s Corporate Responsibility matters
The members of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee are Messrs. McCallister (Chairman), Cook, and Rodriguez. All of the members of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee meet the independence requirements of NYSE listing standards.
After the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee identifies qualified individuals, it makes a recommendation to the Board’s independent Directors. Director nominees are selected by a majority of the Board’s independent Directors in a vote in which only independent Directors participate.
Strategy and Risk Committee
[MISSING IMAGE: ph_johnpschauerman-4clr.jpg]
Meetings: 4
Chair: John P. Schauerman
Other Members:
Stephen C. Cook
Terry D. McCallister
Patricia K. Wagner
Michael E. Ching
Primary Role of this Committee:
The primary role of the Strategy and Risk Committee is to oversee our financial policies, acquisition strategy, financial strategy and enterprise risk management function.
Key Responsibilities:

Reviewing the Company’s strategic plans related to acquisitions and divestitures, including capital structure, proposed methods of financing, and investment strategies

Considering and approving certain mergers, acquisitions, and divestitures by the Company

Monitoring ongoing activities in connection with certain acquisitions, dispositions, and investments

Tracking certain completed acquisitions and investments

Overseeing the Company’s enterprise risk management function

Overseeing the Company’s portfolio of businesses

30   |   PRIMORIS2024 PROXY STATEMENT

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Corporate Governance Principles and Board Matters
Board Role in Risk Oversight
The Board believes that having a system in place for risk management and implementing strategies responsive to our risk profile and exposures is the best way to identify in a timely manner specific material risks, but we can give no assurances that we will be able to identify or mitigate all possible risks in advance. The Company has a clear approach for identifying and mitigating information security risks and four Directors on the Board have information security experience. The Company has also entered into an information security risk insurance policy. While the Board has the ultimate oversight responsibility for the risk management process, its Committees oversee risk in certain specified areas:
[MISSING IMAGE: fc_oversight-pn.jpg]
Selection of Board Nominees
The Board believes that the Board, as a whole, should include individuals with a diverse range of backgrounds and experience to give the Board both depth and breadth in the mix of skills represented for the benefit of our stockholders. The Board endeavors to have a group of Directors representing a diverse background (including gender, race, ethnicity, and age) and to include in its overall composition an array of targeted skills that complement one another rather than requiring each Director to possess the same skills, perspectives and interests. Accordingly, the Board and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee consider the qualifications of Directors and Director nominees both individually and in the broader context of the Board’s overall composition and the Company’s current and future needs.
The Board and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee also understand the importance of Board refreshment and aim to achieve a balance between the knowledge that comes from longer-term service on the Board with the new experience, ideas and energy that can come from adding Directors to the Board. To that end, our Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that Directors may not stand for re-election if the election occurs after they reach the age of 75. In addition, the Board and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee view the consistent focus on Board membership criteria, Board composition and size, as well as the anticipation of vacancies, to be integral parts of Board refreshment.
Our Corporate Governance Guidelines contain Board membership criteria that apply to current Directors as well as Board nominees. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee regularly evaluates the appropriate size of the

2024 PROXY STATEMENTPRIMORIS   |   31

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Corporate Governance Principles and Board Matters
Board and whether any vacancies on the Board are expected due to retirement or otherwise. If any vacancies are anticipated or arise, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will consider Director candidates suggested by current Board members, management, third-party search firms and others. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will also consider Director nominations by stockholders that are made in compliance with our bylaws. All applications, recommendations or proposed nominations for Board membership received by the Company will be referred to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. The manner in which the qualifications of a nominee are evaluated does not differ if the nominee is recommended by a stockholder.
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee’s consideration of a candidate as a Director includes assessment of the individual’s understanding of our business, the individual’s professional and educational background, skills, expertise, potential time commitment, and other criteria established by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee from time to time. To provide such a contribution to us, a Director must generally possess one or more of the following, in addition to personal and professional integrity:

Experience in corporate management;

Experience in our industry;

Experience as a Board member or officer of a publicly held company;

Experience in financial and accounting matters;

Diversity of expertise and experience in substantive matters related to our business; and

Practical and mature business judgment.
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee has adopted its own procedures for evaluating the suitability of potential Director nominees, including qualifications for a “financial expert” and financially literate members for the Audit Committee.
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will consider all stockholder recommendations for candidates for the Board, which should be sent to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, c/o Secretary, Primoris Services Corporation, 2300 N. Field Street, Suite 1900, Dallas, Texas 75201.
The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will evaluate recommendations for Director nominees submitted by Directors, management or qualifying stockholders in the same manner, by using the criteria stated above. All Directors and Director nominees will be required to submit a completed Directors’ and Officers’ questionnaire as part of the nominating process. At the discretion of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, the process may also include interviews and additional background and reference checks for non-incumbent nominees.
[MISSING IMAGE: tm212391d2-fc_selectionpn.jpg]

32   |   PRIMORIS2024 PROXY STATEMENT

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Corporate Governance Principles and Board Matters
Annual Board and Committee Evaluations
Primoris believes that regular Board evaluations are an instrumental component of building and maintaining a strong and effective Board. Each year, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, together with the Company’s Corporate Secretary, coordinates the Board performance evaluations that assist the Board in determining whether the Board, its Committees, and each member of the Board are functioning effectively. This process also assists the Board in determining how it can improve its processes and effectiveness. These evaluations are conducted through a combination of formal and informal processes, including questionnaires which solicit open-ended and candid feedback on an anonymous basis, in-person interviews, and telephone interviews. The collective ratings and comments are compiled, summarized and presented to the Board and its Committees and provide the Board valuable information on a range of topics, including new Director searches, Committee composition, and subject matter for continuing Board education. In addition, the Company periodically engages a third-party consulting firm to conduct a comprehensive Board effectiveness review.
Code of Conduct
The Company has a Code of Conduct that complies with the rules and regulations adopted by the SEC and NYSE listing standards and are applicable to all of our Directors, officers and employees. The Code of Conduct also includes a supplement with additional policies that are applicable to the CEO, CFO and all senior financial officers of the Company. The Code of Conduct is available on the Investor Relations/Governance section of our website at www.prim.com. We intend to post amendments to, or waivers under, if any, our Code of Conduct (to the extent applicable to our Directors or Chief Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer, or Principal Accounting Officer) at this location on our website. Among other matters, this Code of Conduct is designed to promote:

Honest and ethical conduct;

Avoidance of conflicts of interest;

Full, fair, accurate, timely and understandable disclosure in reports and documents that we file with, or submit to, the SEC and in our other public communications;

Compliance with applicable governmental laws and regulations and stock exchange rules;

Prompt internal reporting of violations of the Code of Conduct to an appropriate person or persons identified in the Code of Conduct; and

Accountability for adherence to the Code of Conduct.
Director Access to Officers, Employees, and Information
Directors have full and free access to officers, employees and the books and records of the Company. The Directors are expected to use their judgment to ensure that any such contact is not disruptive to the business operations of the Company. Non-Board member employees may be invited to attend all or portions of Board and/or Committee meetings.
Policy Regarding Director Attendance at Annual Meetings of Stockholders
Directors are strongly encouraged to attend our Annual Meetings of Stockholders. All the Directors were in attendance at the 2023 Annual Meeting.
Communications with the Board of Directors
All interested parties (not just stockholders) may communicate with any of our Directors, either individually or as a group, by writing to them at Primoris Services Corporation, c/o Secretary, 2300 N. Field Street, Suite 1900, Dallas, Texas 75201. Please specify to whom your correspondence should be directed. The Secretary will promptly forward all correspondence to the Board or any specific committee member, as indicated in the correspondence, except for mass mailings, job inquiries, surveys, business solicitations or advertisements, or patently offensive or otherwise inappropriate material. Our Secretary may forward certain correspondence, such as product-related or service-related inquiries, elsewhere within the Company for review and possible response.

2024 PROXY STATEMENTPRIMORIS   |   33

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Corporate Governance Principles and Board Matters
Hiring Independent Advisors
The Board and each Board committee has the full power and authority to hire, at the expense of the Company, independent financial, accounting, legal or other advisors, as necessary to fulfill their duties, without consulting or obtaining the approval of any officer of the Company, and the Company shall pay, or shall provide the committee with, all funds necessary to engage and compensate such advisors. The decision to engage independent advisors must be made by the Board, or a Board Committee, and not by an individual Director or Directors.

34   |   PRIMORIS2024 PROXY STATEMENT

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Our Board has adopted a written policy requiring review, approval and ratification of any material related party transaction, including those that would require disclosure under Item 404 of Regulation S-K, involving a “related person” ​(as defined in Item 404(a) of Regulation S-K, which includes security holders who beneficially own more than 5% of our Common Stock). All material related party transactions may be consummated and continued only if the Audit Committee has approved or ratified such transaction after a review of the relevant facts and circumstances and a determination that the terms to be obtained or consideration to be paid or received, as applicable, in connection with the transactions are comparable to terms available or the amounts that would be paid or received, as applicable, in arm’s length transactions with independent third parties.
Since January 1, 2023, there have been no related party transactions that were required to be reported under the SEC’s related person transaction rules.

2024 PROXY STATEMENTPRIMORIS   |   35

TABLE OF CONTENTS
DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

Directors who are also employees of the Company do not receive additional compensation for serving as Directors. Compensation for employee Directors is determined by the Board’s Compensation Committee and is discussed further in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of this proxy.
In August 2022, the Compensation Committee approved changes for independent Directors of the Company, which includes the following components:

Cash payments of $22,500 each quarter.

Common Stock with an approximate aggregate value of $32,500 each quarter. The Common Stock cannot be traded for a period of one year from the date of issuance. The number of shares is determined using the average of the closing prices of the Company’s Common Stock on principle listing exchange for the one-month period prior to the beginning of the quarter. The shares are issued pursuant to the Primoris 2023 Equity Incentive Plan, approved by the stockholders on May 3, 2023 (“2023 Equity Incentive Plan”) and formerly were issued pursuant to the Primoris 2013 Equity Incentive Plan, approved by the stockholders on May 3, 2013 (“2013 Equity Incentive Plan”).

Additional annual cash compensation as follows:

$120,000 to the Chairman of the Board;

$30,000 to the Lead Independent Director;

$20,000 to the Chairman of the Audit Committee; and

$15,000 to the non-employee chairman of any other Committees established by the Board of Directors.
In addition, Directors are reimbursed for expenses incurred in connection with Board and Board Committee meetings and assignments.

36   |   PRIMORIS2024 PROXY STATEMENT

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Director Compensation
The table below details the compensation earned by our non-employee Directors in 2023.
Non-Employee DirectorFees
Earned or
Paid in
Cash
Stock
Awards
(1)
Total
Michael E. Ching$90,000$135,905$225,905
Stephen C. Cook120,000135,905255,905
David L. King210,000135,905345,905
Carla S. Mashinski110,000135,905245,905
Terry D. McCallister105,000135,905240,905
Jose R. Rodriguez90,000135,905225,905
John P. Schauerman105,000135,905240,905
Patricia K. Wagner105,000135,905240,905
1
Represents the aggregate grant date fair value of the shares of Common Stock issued to each of the non-employee Directors as compensation during 2023. The shares were issued under the 2013 Equity Incentive Plan and the 2023 Equity Incentive Plan and are subject to a one-year contractual holding requirement from the date of issuance. The Company has never issued stock options as Director compensation and there were no outstanding equity awards as of December 31, 2023.

2024 PROXY STATEMENTPRIMORIS   |   37

TABLE OF CONTENTS
STOCK OWNERSHIP

Security Ownership of 5% or Greater Stockholders, Directors, Director Nominees and Executive Officers
The following table sets forth information with respect to beneficial ownership of Common Stock for (a) those persons known by management of the Company to beneficially own 5% or more of our Common Stock (other than executives and Directors), (b) each Director and Director nominee, (c) the named executive officers listed in the Summary Compensation Table under “Executive Compensation”, and (d) all of our executive officers and Directors as a group. The information for the officers and Directors is provided as of March 11, 2024, and the information for 5% or more institutional stockholders is as of the most recent filing with the SEC as noted in the table below. The Company is not aware of any arrangement or pledge of Common Stock that could result in a change of control of the Company.
Beneficial ownership is determined under the rules of the SEC and generally includes voting or investment power with respect to securities
Name
Amount and
Nature of
Beneficial
Ownership
(1)
Percentage of
Common Stock
Outstanding
(2)
5% or Greater Stockholders (other than executives and Directors):
Blackrock, Inc.(3)5,448,45210.2%
The Vanguard Group(4)5,225,7799.7%
Dimensional Fund Advisors LP(5)
3,595,5696.7%
Named Executive Officers and Directors:
Michael E. Ching8,813*
Stephen C. Cook9,825*
David L. King31,717*
Carla S. Mashinski23,537*
Terry D. McCallister(6)
26,571*
Jose R. Rodriguez13,165*
John P. Schauerman(7)
258,279*
Patricia K. Wagner16,571*
Kenneth M. Dodgen46,658*
Thomas E. McCormick84,961*
John M. Perisich(8)
158,662*
John F. Moreno Jr.(9)
39,269*
All Directors, nominees and executive officers as a group (11 individuals)678,7591.3%
*
Indicates beneficial ownership of less than one percent of total outstanding Common Stock.
1
This table lists voting securities, including shares held of record, shares held by a bank, broker or nominee for the person’s interest and shares held through family trust arrangements. Unless otherwise indicated and subject to community property laws where applicable, the named executive officers and Directors named in the table above have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of our stock shown as beneficially owned by them.
2
For each individual and group included in the table, percentage ownership is calculated by dividing the number of shares beneficially owned by such person or group plus the number of shares of Common Stock that such person or group has the right to acquire on or within 60 days after March 11, 2024 divided by the sum of the 53,618,814 shares of Common Stock outstanding on March 11, 2024, plus the number of shares of Common Stock that such person or group has the right to acquire on or within 60 days after March 11, 2024.
3
Based on information set forth in the Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on January 8, 2024, by BlackRock, Inc., which has sole voting power over 5,255,410 shares and sole dispositive power over 5,488,452 shares. The principal business address of Blackrock, Inc. is 55 East 52nd Street, New York, NY 10055.

38   |   PRIMORIS2024 PROXY STATEMENT

TABLE OF CONTENTS
STOCK OWNERSHIP
4
Based on information set forth in the Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 13, 2024, by The Vanguard Group, which has shared voting power over 38,871 shares, sole dispositive power over 5,128,782 shares, and shared dispositive power over
96,997 shares. The principal business address of The Vanguard Group is 100 Vanguard Blvd, Malvern, PA 19355.
5
Based on information set forth in the Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 14, 2024, by Dimensional Fund Advisors LP which has sole voting power over 3,657,732 shares, and sole dispositive power over 4,674,243 shares. The principal business address of Dimensional Fund Advisors LP. is 6300 Bee Cave Road, Building One, Austin, TX 78746.
6
Includes 10,000 shares of Common Stock owned directly by the Terry D. McCallister Trust dated June 14, 2013, and indirectly by Terry D. McCallister, as trustee of the trust.
7
Includes 257,281 shares of Common Stock owned directly by the John P. Schauerman & Claudia H. Schauerman Family Trust dated August 12, 2010, and indirectly by John P. Schauerman, as trustee of the trust.
8
Includes 145,214 shares of Common Stock owned directly by the Perisich Family Trust dated July 11, 2007, and indirectly by John M. Perisich, as trustee of the trust.
9
The Company and Mr. Moreno entered into a mutual agreement of separation effective May 22, 2023. The Company has no information regarding his Common Stock ownership as of March 11, 2024. Accordingly, information regarding number of shares of Common Stock owned is presented as of the date of Mr. Moreno’s separation.
Delinquent Section 16(a) Reports
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) requires our officers, Directors and persons who beneficially own more than ten percent (10%) of a registered class of our equity securities to file reports of securities ownership and changes in ownership with the SEC.
As of the date of this Proxy Statement and based solely on our review of the copies of such reports furnished to us and written representations from our executive officers and Directors, we believe that all reports needed to be filed by current Section 16 reporting persons since January 1, 2023, were filed on a timely basis other than the following delayed filings: one Form 4 for Messrs. McCormick, Dodgen and Perisich covering a common stock acquisition, two Form 4s for Messrs. Ching, Cook, King, McCallister, Rodriguez and Schauerman covering common stock acquisitions, two Form 4s for Mss. Mashinski and Wagner covering common stock acquisitions and one Form 4 for Mr. Cook covering a common stock disposition.

2024 PROXY STATEMENTPRIMORIS   |   39

TABLE OF CONTENTS

INFORMATION ABOUT AUDIT FEES AND SERVICES
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Fees and Services
The following is a summary of the fees billed for professional services for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2023, and 2022:
Fee Category2023 Fees2022 Fees
Audit Fees(1)$2,202,762$2,447,014
Audit Related Fees(2)114,000190,500
Tax Fees(3)6,500
All Other Fees
Total Fees$2,316,762$2,644,014
1
Fees for audit services billed for each of the last two fiscal years consist of the fees associated with the annual audit and reviews of our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, as well as out-of-pocket expenses incurred in the performance of audit services.
2
Audit related fees billed in each of the last two fiscal years include fees for proxy filings, registration statements, employee benefit plan audit, and standalone audits for Primoris subsidiaries.
3
Tax fees billed in each of the last two fiscal years include professional services rendered for tax advice and tax planning.
Policy on Audit Committee Pre-Approval of Audit and Permissible Non-Audit Services of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Audit Committee has adopted policies and procedures regarding the pre-approval of the performance by Moss Adams LLP of audit, audit-related and tax services, except as may otherwise be permitted by law or regulation. Moss Adams LLP has also been instructed to obtain advance approval of any other services. Each pre-approval is detailed as to the particular service or category of services and is generally subject to a specific budget. Moss Adams LLP and management are required to periodically report to the Audit Committee regarding the services provided by the independent auditors in accordance with this pre-approval. All services listed above and all fees were approved in advance by the Audit Committee.

40   |   PRIMORIS2024 PROXY STATEMENT

TABLE OF CONTENTS
AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT

The following report of the Audit Committee does not constitute soliciting material and shall not be deemed filed or incorporated by reference into any other filing by us under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent we specifically incorporate this report by reference.
The primary purpose of the Audit Committee is to assist the Board in fulfilling its responsibility to oversee (i) the integrity of our financial statements, (ii) the independent registered public accounting firm’s qualifications, independence and performance, (iii) our accounting and financial reporting processes, (iv) our compliance with financial, legal and regulatory requirements, and (v) the audits of our financial statements. The Audit Committee is directly responsible for the appointment, compensation and oversight of the work of the independent registered public accounting firm. The independent registered public accounting firm reports directly to the Audit Committee.
Management has the primary responsibility for the preparation of the financial statements and the reporting process, as well as performing an evaluation and assessment of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting using the control criteria framework of the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO 2013). Our management has represented to the Audit Committee that the consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year endingended December 31, 2016.

Unless you give other instructions on your proxy card, the individual(s) named as proxy holder on the proxy card will vote2023, were prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and that the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2023. In addition to its review and discussion with management of the audited consolidated financial statements and in the performance of its oversight function over internal controls, the Audit Committee reviewed and discussed with management the critical accounting policies that were applied in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements, and the process for certifications by our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer.

Our independent registered public accounting firm is responsible for auditing the consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023, and issuing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2023. The Audit Committee discussed the results of the work of the independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committee discussed with the independent registered public accounting firm the matters required to be discussed by the applicable requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”), including PCAOB AS 1301 (Communications with Audit Committees). In addition, the Audit Committee received from the independent registered public accounting firm the written disclosures required by applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding the independent accountant’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence and discussed with them their independence from the Company and its management. The Audit Committee also evaluated whether the independent registered public accounting firm’s provision of non-audit services to us was compatible with the auditor’s independence and determined it was compatible. The members of the Audit Committee met in executive session (with no management in attendance) with the independent registered public accounting firm each quarter during the year.
The Board determined that the Audit Committee members meet the independence requirements of Rule 10A-3 of the Exchange Act and applicable NYSE independence rules.
In reliance on the reviews and discussions referred to above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board, and the Board approved, the inclusion of the audited consolidated financial statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2023, for filing with the SEC.
Audit Committee
Carla S. Mashinski (Chair)
Michael E. Ching
Stephen C. Cook
Jose R. Rodriguez

2024 PROXY STATEMENTPRIMORIS   |   41

TABLE OF CONTENTS
EXECUTIVE LEADERSHIP

The executive officers of Primoris as of March 11, 2024 are as follows:
See “Proposal 1 – Election of Directors” for a description of Mr. McCormick’s (President and Chief Executive Officer) business experience.
[MISSING IMAGE: ph_kennethmdodgen-4clr.jpg]
Kenneth M. Dodgen
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer (CFO)
Age: 58
Mr. Dodgen has served as our Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer since November 2018. He previously served as our Senior Vice President and Corporate Controller since May 2017. Mr. Dodgen has over 30 years of experience in finance and accounting across many different industries including construction, power generation, technology, energy and power marketing. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Dodgen served as Chief Financial Officer at Baker Hill Solutions from 2016 to 2017, Chief Financial Officer at PLH Group, Inc. from 2011 to 2015, and Chief Financial Officer at Fulcrum Power Services from 2006 to 2011. From 1996 to 2006, Mr. Dodgen spent ten years in investment banking with JPMorgan and Merrill Lynch where he focused predominantly on mergers and acquisitions. Prior to investment banking, Mr. Dodgen worked for Affiliated Computer Services in Dallas, and he began his career at PricewaterhouseCoopers. Mr. Dodgen received a B.B.A. in Accounting from Texas A&M University and an M.B.A. from the Booth School of Business at The University of Chicago. He is a licensed CPA.
[MISSING IMAGE: ph_johnmperisich-4c.jpg]
John M. Perisich
Executive Vice President, Chief Legal and Administrative Officer and Secretary
Age: 59
Mr. Perisich has served as our Executive Vice President and Chief Legal and Administrative Officer since March 2024 and previously served as our Executive Vice President and Chief Legal Officer since May 2013. He previously served as our Senior Vice President and General Counsel from July 2008. Prior to that, he served as Vice President and General Counsel of Primoris Corporation beginning in February 2006, and previous to that was Vice President and General Counsel of Primoris Corporation and its predecessor, ARB, Inc. Mr. Perisich joined ARB in 1995. Prior to joining ARB, Mr. Perisich practiced law at Klein, Wegis, a full-service law firm based in Bakersfield, California. He received a B.A. degree from UCLA in 1987, and a J.D. from the University of Santa Clara in 1991.

42   |   PRIMORIS2024 PROXY STATEMENT

TABLE OF CONTENTS
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Compensation Discussion and Analysis
This section discusses the oversight of our executive compensation program by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors and provides a discussion of the compensation provided in 2023 to our named executive officers (“NEOs”). Our NEOs for 2023 include the following:
[MISSING IMAGE: ph_thomasemccormick-4clr.jpg]
[MISSING IMAGE: ph_kennethmdodgen-4clr.jpg]
[MISSING IMAGE: ph_johnmperisich-4c.jpg]
Thomas E.
McCormick
Kenneth M.
Dodgen
John M.
Perisich
President and Chief Executive Officer (CEO)Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer (CFO)Executive Vice President, Chief Legal and Administrative Officer and Secretary
Overview
Our management compensation programs apply broadly to all officers and management persons at the Company with modifications to reflect the different management levels, experience levels and types of responsibilities. The Company’s goal is to align compensation so that the entire management team is committed to the Company’s corporate objectives of achieving both near- and long-term profitable growth.
In 2019, the Compensation Committee approved the Incentive Compensation Plan (“ICP”) that established a more formulaic annual incentive calculation and added an increased emphasis on equity awards within the total compensation structure. The ICP established a total annual reward that was paid 75% in cash and 25% in equity. In 2023, the Compensation Committee implemented an all-cash Annual Incentive Plan (“AIP”) along with an equity based Long-Term Incentive Plan (“LTIP”). The AIP provides for an annual incentive calculation that is based on Company performance metrics and is paid in cash. The LTIP provides for an annual grant of equity awards. The first grant under the LTIP occurred in March 2023. We believe this incentive structure will further enhance value for our stockholders.
Shareholder “Say-on-Pay” Vote
[MISSING IMAGE: pc_sayonpay-pn.jpg]
At our Annual Meeting of Stockholders in May 2023, 91.0% of votes cast on our advisory vote on executive compensation (“say-on-pay proposal”) were voted in favor of the proposal, which our Compensation Committee has considered in designing and granting compensation to our NEOs. Consistent with the vote of our shareholders at our 2023 Annual Meeting on the proposed frequency for seeking advisory votes on executive compensation, we submit a say-on-pay proposal to a shareholder vote every year.

2024 PROXY STATEMENTPRIMORIS   |   43

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Compensation Philosophy
[MISSING IMAGE: tm212391d2-fc_philospypn.jpg]

44   |   PRIMORIS2024 PROXY STATEMENT

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Executive Compensation
Processes and Procedures for Determining Executive Compensation
The following describes the roles of the key participants and sources of information in the process of setting compensation.
[MISSING IMAGE: fc_process-pn.jpg]

2024 PROXY STATEMENTPRIMORIS   |   45

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Executive Compensation
Components of NEO Compensation
The primary elements of our current compensation and benefits programs for our NEOs are summarized in the table below. Each component has a critical role in motivating and rewarding strong performance and retaining the NEOs who deliver such performance.
Compensation ElementPerformance/Payment CriteriaPurpose
Base Salary
Cash

Individual performance;

Specific role and responsibilities; and

Experience in the role

To provide a fixed level of cash compensation; and

To attract and retain key executives
Annual Incentive Plan
Cash
Total award is based on the achievement of performance targets established by the Compensation Committee related to:

Net Income;

New Business Generated;

Cash Management; and

Safety Performance

To provide incentives to achieve annual financial and operational performance targets, which focus on profitable growth and safe execution;

To reward achievement of those targets; and

To attract and retain key executives
Long-Term Incentive Plan
Performance Stock Units (“PSUs”)
Restricted Stock Units (“RSUs”)

PSUs vest over three years, subject to continued service, and are tied to the achievement of performance targets related to (i) Net Income and (ii) Operating Margin, in each case established by the Compensation Committee

RSUs vest over three years, subject to continued service

To incentivize achievement of our long-term financial performance targets;

To attract and retain key executives; and

To align executive and stockholder interests
Retirement Benefits
401(k) Matching

To provide a competitive compensation package
Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan
Perquisites
Healthcare Benefits
Auto Allowance
Aircraft Usage

To maintain the health and safety of executives; and

To provide a competitive compensation package
Compensation Committee Pay Decisions
Base Salary Amounts
In accordance with Company practices, base salaries for employees are reviewed annually. For the NEOs, with the exception of the CEO, the Compensation Committee reviewed the recommendations from Mr. McCormick at the time of the Board.

Expenseannual reviews. The following table shows changes approved by the Board, effective February 26, 2023:

Name2023 Base Salary2022 Base SalaryPercentage Increase
Thomas E. McCormick$900,000$850,0005.9%
Kenneth M. Dodgen555,000530,0004.7%
John M. Perisich555,000530,0004.7%
John F. Moreno Jr.(1)625,000600,0004.2%

46   |   PRIMORIS2024 PROXY STATEMENT

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Executive Compensation
1
Mr. Moreno was Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer from April 2019 until mutual separation from the Company effective May 22, 2023.
Annual Incentive Plan
The Company’s annual incentive plan (“AIP”) for senior leadership and executives is designed to provide annual awards payable in cash.
An eligible NEO that begins employment during the performance year will generally be prorated for their first year based on their date of soliciting proxies

We will payhire, unless otherwise determined by the costsCEO and with the approval of the Compensation Committee. Generally, a NEO must be employed by the Company on the date any cash incentive compensation is paid. Otherwise, the NEO forfeits any and all rights to such compensation unless contractual provisions entitle the NEO to a full or pro-rated amount or otherwise as determined by the CEO (other than with respect to himself) and with approval of the Compensation Committee.

Measurable Performance Awards
The measurable performance award for each NEO under the AIP is calculated as a percentage of such NEO’s base salary earned during the year (the “AIP Target”), which is then multiplied by the weighted achievement percentage associated with the Company performance metrics, as set forth in the following calculation:
[MISSING IMAGE: fc_performance-pn.jpg]

2024 PROXY STATEMENTPRIMORIS   |   47

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Executive Compensation
The Compensation Committee established the following AIP Targets for each NEO for the solicitation2023 performance year:
NameBase Salary EarnedAIP Target
(% of Base Salary)
AIP Target Amount
Thomas E. McCormick$890,769120%$1,068,923
Kenneth M. Dodgen550,385100550,385
John M. Perisich550,385100550,385
John F. Moreno Jr.250,192
(1)
1
Mr. Moreno separated from the Company effective May 22, 2023, and did not receive a bonus.
Net Income Component
The Net Income Component of proxies,the AIP is based on annual net income. A payout occurs only if actual net income is greater than the threshold amount and payout under this component is subject to a maximum achievement percentage. Based on the performance scale adopted by the Compensation Committee for the 2023 performance year, NEOs could earn awards for this component of the AIP as follows (when performance falls between the designated payout points above the threshold amount, the awards are determined by interpolation):
If Net Income is (in millions)% of TargetAchievement %
Below $89.8 (threshold)Less than 75%0%
$89.875%25%
$119.7 (target)100%100%
At or above $143.7 (maximum)120%150%
For the 2023 performance year, the Compensation Committee established a target AIP net income of $119.7 million. The Compensation Committee concluded that actual AIP net income for the performance year was $125.4, which represents approximately 104.8% of the target and an achievement percentage of 111.9%.
The following table details the actual payouts associated with the AIP Net Income component:
NameAIP Target
Amount
AIP Net Income
Component
Achievement
Percentage
AIP Net Income
Award Earned
(1)
Thomas E. McCormick$1,068,92360%111.9%$717,720
Kenneth M. Dodgen550,38560111.9369,552
John M. Perisich550,38560111.9369,552
1
Calculations may not be exact due to the rounding of the achievement percentage input used in the calculation.
New Business Generated Component
The New Business Generated Component of the AIP measures the amount of new business the Company has generated in the plan year. A payout occurs only if actual new business generated is greater than the threshold amount and payout under this component is subject to a maximum achievement percentage. Based on the performance scale adopted by the Compensation Committee for the 2023 performance year, NEOs could earn awards for this component of the AIP as follows (when performance falls between the designated payout points above the threshold amount, the awards are determined by interpolation):
If New Business Taken is (in millions)(1)
% of TargetAchievement %
Below $4,140.3 (threshold)Less than 75%0%
$4,140.375%25%
$5,520.3 (target)100%100%
At or above $6,624.4 (maximum)Greater than 120%150%
1
Sum of new contracts executed where scope is adequately defined, and revenue generated under contracts where scope is not adequately defined during the plan year.

48   |   PRIMORIS2024 PROXY STATEMENT

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Executive Compensation
For the 2023 performance year, the Compensation Committee established a target AIP new business generated of $5,520.3 million. The Compensation Committee concluded that actual AIP new business generated for the performance year was $7,486.1 million, which represents approximately 135.6% of the target and an achievement percentage of 150.0%.
The following table details the actual payouts associated with the AIP New Business Generated component:
NameAIP Target
Amount
AIP New
Business
Generated
Component
Achievement
Percentage
AIP New
Business
Generated
Award Earned
(1)
Thomas E. McCormick$1,068,92320%150.0%$320,677
Kenneth M. Dodgen550,38520150.0165,115
John M. Perisich550,38520150.0165,115
1
Calculations may not be exact due to the rounding of the achievement percentage input used in the calculation.
Cash Management Component
The Cash Management Component of the AIP signifies the ability of the Company to manage cash during the 2023 plan year. A payout occurs only if actual cash management is better than the threshold amount and payout under this component is subject to a maximum achievement percentage. Based on the performance scale adopted by the Compensation Committee for the 2023 performance year, NEOs could earn awards for this component of the AIP as follows (when performance falls between the designated payout points above the threshold amount, the awards are determined by interpolation):
If Cash Management is (in days)(1)
% of TargetAchievement %
Above 87.5 (threshold)Greater than 125%0%
87.5125%25%
70.0 (target)100%100%
At or below 56.0 (maximum)Less than 80%150%
1
Cash management is measured as the average days of accounts receivable outstanding plus the average days of unbilled contract revenue outstanding less the average days of deferred contract revenue outstanding.
For the 2023 performance year, the Compensation Committee established a target AIP cash management of 70 days. The Compensation Committee concluded that actual AIP cash management for the performance year was 60 days, which represents approximately 114.3% of the target and an achievement percentage of 135.7%.
The following table details the actual payouts associated with the AIP Cash Management component:
NameAIP Target
Amount
AIP Cash
Management
Component
Achievement
Percentage
AIP Cash
Management
Award Earned
(1)
Thomas E. McCormick$1,068,92310%135.7%$145,068
Kenneth M. Dodgen550,38510135.774,695
John M. Perisich550,38510135.774,695
1
Calculations may not be exact due to the rounding of the achievement percentage input used in the calculation.

2024 PROXY STATEMENTPRIMORIS   |   49

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Executive Compensation
Safety Performance Component
The final component of the AIP is based on the Company’s achievement of measurable safety performance goals. Performance with respect to this component is measured by the Company’s consolidated total recordable incident rate (“TRIR”) for the performance year. A payout occurs only if actual TRIR is below the threshold amount and payout under this component is subject to a maximum achievement percentage. Based on the performance scale adopted by the Compensation Committee for the 2023 performance year, NEOs could earn awards for this component of the AIP as follows (when performance falls between the designated payout points below the threshold amount, the awards are determined by interpolation):
If TRIR is(1)
% of TargetAchievement %
Above 0.70 (threshold)Greater than 125%0%
0.70125%25%
0.56 (target)100%100%
Below 0.45 (maximum)Less than 80%150%
1
TRIR is defined as the number of work injuries in the performance year multiplied by 200,000 divided by reportable hours worked.
For the 2023 performance year, the Compensation Committee established a target AIP TRIR of 0.56. The Compensation Committee concluded that actual AIP TRIR for the performance year was 0.46, which represents approximately 117.9% of the target and an achievement percentage of 144.6%.
The following table details the actual payouts associated with the AIP Safety component:
NameAIP Target
Amount
AIP Safety
Component
Achievement
Percentage
AIP Safety
Award Earned
(1)
Thomas E. McCormick$1,068,92310%144.6%$154,612
Kenneth M. Dodgen550,38510144.679,609
John M. Perisich550,38510144.679,609
1
Calculations may not be exact due to the rounding of the achievement percentage input used in the calculation.
Long-Term Incentive Plan (“LTIP”)
In 2022, the Compensation Committee approved a replacement for the previous Incentive Compensation Plan (“ICP”) where the NEOs were paid their total incentives awards 75% in cash and 25% in RSUs with the LTIP. The RSUs from the ICP generally vest over three years in equal annual installments, as long as the NEO is employed by the Company, subject to accelerated vesting upon the reporting person’s termination without cause, death, disability, or retirement from the Company. The number of RSUs were determined using a 25% discount to the average December 2021 closing price for Primoris shares. The last RSU vesting under this plan occurred on March 1, 2024.The LTIP for senior leadership is designed to provide our NEOs with long-term incentive awards payable in equity. Targets are reviewed and set by the Compensation Committee. In connection with the new LTIP design, the 2023 award values approved by the Compensation Committee included both annual and transition components. This approach was intended to be a one-time occurrence and, in 2024, LTIP award values will be based on the annual component only. As performance periods are completed, we will discuss the achievement and any payouts, along with retroactively disclosing the targets for the metrics that do not cause competitive harm, after the relevant portion of the LTIP awards vest.
In 2023, 75% of the equity granted was in the form of PSUs and 25% was in the form of RSUs. RSUs vest over three years in increments of 25% after year one, 25% after year two and 50% after year three. PSUs for the 2023 plan year are eligible to vest over three years in increments of 25% after year one, 25% after year two and 50% after year three. Actual vested shares under PSU awards for any vesting year are determined by performance for that year against metrics as outlined below. The Compensation Committee approved, for the 2023 plan year only, the PSU vesting schedule to be ratable with the aim to effectively transition participants from the ICP. In performance year 2024 and beyond, 100% of the PSUs granted will cliff vest after year three.

50   |   PRIMORIS2024 PROXY STATEMENT

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Executive Compensation
NameTotal Grant
(in units at target)
PSUs Granted
(in units at target)
RSUs Granted
(in units)
Thomas E. McCormick168,365126,27342,092
Kenneth M. Dodgen59,63844,72814,910
John M. Perisich67,09350,31916,774
John F. Moreno Jr.(1)79,27459,45519,819
1
Mr. Moreno separated from the Company on May 22,2023. Pursuant to the terms of the separation agreement, the Company accelerated the vesting of the 19,819 RSUs and the 59,455 PSUs were forfeited.
Cumulative Net Income Component
The Net Income Component of the LTIP is based on cumulative net income. Vesting occurs only if actual cumulative net income is greater than the threshold amount and payout under this component is subject to a maximum achievement percentage. Based on the performance scale adopted by the Compensation Committee for the 2023 performance year, NEOs could earn PSU awards for this component of the LTIP as follows (when performance falls between the designated payout points above the threshold amount, the awards are determined by interpolation):
If Net Income is (in millions)% of TargetAchievement %
Below $89.8 (threshold)Less than 75%0%
$89.875%25%
$119.7 (target)100%100%
At or above $143.7 (maximum)120%200%
For the 2023 performance year, the Compensation Committee established a target LTIP Cumulative Net Income of $119.7 million. The Compensation Committee concluded that actual net income for the performance year was $125.4 million, which represents approximately 104.8% of the target and an achievement percentage of 123.8%.
The following table details the actual payouts associated with the LTIP Cumulative Net Income component which were paid to our NEOs in shares of Primoris common stock after completion of the performance period ended December 31, 2023:
NameLTIP PSU Target
Shares
LTIP Cumulative
Net Income
Component
Achievement
Percentage
LTIP PSU
Shares Earned(1)
Thomas E. McCormick31,56970%123.8%27,362
Kenneth M. Dodgen11,18270%123.8%9,693
John M. Perisich12,58070%123.8%10,905
1
Calculations may not be exact due to the rounding of the achievement percentage input used in the calculation.
Operating Margin Percentage Component
The Operating Margin Percentage of the LTIP is based on the annual operating margin percentage. A vesting occurs only if actual operating margin percentage is greater than the threshold amount and payout under this component is subject to a maximum achievement percentage. Based on the performance scale adopted by the Compensation Committee for the 2023 performance year, NEOs could earn PSU awards for this component of the LTIP as follows (when performance falls between the designated payout points above the threshold amount, the awards are determined by interpolation):
If Operating Margin is% of TargetAchievement %
Below 3.60% (threshold)Less than 75%0%
3.60%75%25%
4.80% (target)100%100%
At or above 5.76% (maximum)120%200%

2024 PROXY STATEMENTPRIMORIS   |   51

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Executive Compensation
For the 2023 performance year, the Compensation Committee established a target LTIP Operating Margin % of 4.80%. The Compensation Committee concluded that actual Operating Margin % for the performance year was 4.41%, which represents approximately 91.9% of the target and an achievement percentage of 75.6%.
The following table details the actual payouts associated with the Operating Margin Percentage component which were paid to our NEOs in shares of Primoris common stock after completion of the performance period ended December 31, 2023:
NameLTIP PSU Target
Shares
LTIP Operating
Margin
Percentage
Component
Achievement
Percentage
LTIP PSU
Shares Earned(1)
Thomas E. McCormick31,56930%75.6%7,162
Kenneth M. Dodgen11,18230%75.6%2,538
John M. Perisich12,58030%75.6%2,856
1
Calculations may not be exact due to the rounding of the achievement percentage input used in the calculation.
Other Compensation Items
Stock Ownership Guidelines
In August 2019, our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee established minimum stock ownership guidelines for executive officers, with the goal of promoting equity ownership and aligning our executive officers’ interests with our stockholders. The ownership guidelines are currently established at the following minimum levels:
NameGuideline
Chief Executive Officer3x base salary
Other Executive Officers2x base salary
Officers will have five years from adoption of these stock ownership guidelines or five years from the date of hiring or promotion to acquire the shares needed to meet the stock ownership guidelines. The Company’s Secretary will evaluate compliance on an annual basis, as of April 29 of each year, and not on a running basis. If an officer achieves compliance with these stock ownership guidelines as of April 29 of any year, the officer will not be deemed to have failed to comply with these guidelines as of April 29 of any future year as a result of a decline in the Company’s stock price if the officer has not sold any shares. The Secretary will provide a compliance report to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee prior to the annual election of executive officers.
The following are used in determining stock ownership for purposes of these guidelines:

shares owned separately by the officer or owned either jointly with, or separately by, his or her immediate family members residing in the same household;

shares held in trust for the benefit of the officer or his immediate family members;

shares purchased on the open market;

shares purchased or awarded through the Company’s Long-term Retention Plan (the “LTR Plan”);

vested and unvested time-based restricted stock or restricted stock units; and

dividend equivalent shares.
Anti-Hedging Policy
The Company prohibits Directors and executive officers from entering into speculative transactions in Primoris securities, such as prepaid variable forwards, forward sale contracts, short sales, equity swaps, collars, zero-cost collars and other derivative transactions. We believe these prohibitions ensure that levels of stock ownership in accordance with our stock ownership guidelines are effective in aligning each individual’s interests with those of our stockholders.
Pay Recoupment (Clawback) Policy
On November 2, 2023, the Board adopted the Dodd-Frank Compensation Recovery Policy for NEOs, effective as of October 2, 2023.

52   |   PRIMORIS2024 PROXY STATEMENT

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Executive Compensation
If the Company is required to prepare an accounting restatement due to the material noncompliance of the Company with any financial reporting requirement under the federal securities laws, the Company will recover any erroneously awarded incentive-based compensation from current or former officers subject to reporting under Section 16 of the Exchange Act that was received within the applicable recovery period. The Compensation Committee of the Board has discretion to make all decisions under this policy.
Risk Assessment
The Compensation Committee considered the risks associated with the Company’s compensation policies and practices for executive officers and determined that it did not identify any risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company. This conclusion was based on the following considerations:

The Compensation Committee structures compensation at the senior management level to consist of both fixed and variable compensation. The base salaries of senior management are typically set at market levels and are designed to provide a steady income so that senior management does not feel pressured to focus exclusively on stock price performance to the detriment of other important business metrics. The variable portions of compensation are generally designed to reward both short-term and long-term performance as measured under several financial and operational performance metrics. Additionally, PSUs and RSUs generally vest over three years, which the Compensation Committee believes encourages senior management to focus on sustained stock appreciation and promotes retention. The Compensation Committee believes that the variable elements of compensation are a sufficient percentage of overall compensation to motivate short-term and long-term results, while the fixed element is also sufficient such that senior management is not encouraged to take unnecessary or excessive risks in doing so.

The Compensation Committee believes the financial and operational performance measures for determining cash and equity awards earned under our incentive plans are aligned with the Company’s short-term and long-term operating and strategic plans and that the targets for those measures are set at appropriate levels that do not encourage unnecessary or excessive risk taking.

The Board has adopted stock ownership guidelines for our executive officers, which the Compensation Committee believes provide a considerable incentive for management to consider the Company’s long-term interests because a meaningful portion of their personal investment portfolio consists of the Company’s Common Stock.

Individual awards are capped under our AIP, which the Compensation Committee believes mitigates excessive risk taking.

The Company has a clawback policy that requires us to recover certain incentive compensation from executive officers for the achievement of certain Company financial results that were subsequently subject to a restatement.
Tax Matters
Generally, Internal Revenue Code Section 162(m) limits a tax deduction to public companies for compensation of each “covered employee” to $1 million in any one year. Amendments to Section 162(m) for the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (“Tax Act”) became effective in tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2018. As amended, Section 162(m) no longer allows performance-based compensation to be exempt from the deduction limitation. Further, for tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2018, the deduction limitation applies to compensation of a public company’s CEO, CFO and each of the next three highest compensated executive officers. Beginning in 2017, an employee who becomes a covered employee will remain a covered employee until separation from the Company. The Company structured the 2013 and 2023 Equity Incentive Plans with the intention that certain performance awards made under the plans would qualify for tax deductibility. As a result of changes within the Tax Act, the performance awards are now subject to the deduction limitation along with other compensation.
Employment Agreements for Named Executive Officers
Effective April 1, 2022, the Company entered into an employment agreement with Thomas E. McCormick, setting out his annual base salary, plus a performance bonus opportunity. In the event of termination without cause, resignation with good reason or by reason of death or disability, severance benefits will be paid, including a lump sum equal to 200% of the annual base salary, a pro-rated bonus for the current year, up to one year of the employee’s share of the premium for COBRA medical benefits, and accelerated vesting of any unvested RSUs and PSUs. In the event of termination due to a change in control, severance benefits will be paid, including a lump sum equal to 2.5 times the sum of the annual base salary in effect upon the termination date and the target bonus for the year in which the termination date occurs, a bonus, if any, which would have been payable to the employee for the calendar year in which the termination date occurs, up to 30 months of the employee’s share of the premium for COBRA medical benefits and accelerated vesting of any unvested RSUs and PSUs.
Effective April 1, 2022, the Company entered into employment agreements with Kenneth M. Dodgen and John M. Perisich setting out their annual base salary, plus a performance bonus opportunity. In the event of termination without cause, resignation with good reason or by reason of death or disability, severance benefits will be paid, including a lump sum equal to 100% of the annual base salary, a pro-rated bonus for the current year, up to one year of the employee’s share of the premium for COBRA medical benefits, and accelerated vesting of any unvested RSUs and PSUs. In the event of termination due to a change in control, severance benefits will be paid, including a lump sum equal to 2.0 times the

2024 PROXY STATEMENTPRIMORIS   |   53

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Executive Compensation
sum of the annual base salary in effect upon the termination date and the target bonus for the year in which the termination date occurs, a pro-rated bonus, if any, which would have been payable to the employee for the calendar year in which the termination date occurs, up to 24 months of the employee’s share of the premium for COBRA medical benefits and accelerated vesting of any unvested RSUs and PSUs.
All of the employment agreements contain certain restrictive covenants that prohibit the executives from disclosing information that is confidential to us and our subsidiaries and generally prohibits them, during the employment term and for two years thereafter, from soliciting or hiring our employees or our subsidiary employees and from using our confidential information to divert any customer business from us, or to otherwise alter the manner in which a customer does business with us.

54   |   PRIMORIS2024 PROXY STATEMENT

TABLE OF CONTENTS
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT

The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors has reviewed and discussed with management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis contained in this Proxy Statement. Based on this review and discussion, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included herein and incorporated by reference into the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2023.
Compensation Committee
Patricia K. Wagner (Chair)
Carla S. Mashinski
John P. Schauerman

2024 PROXY STATEMENTPRIMORIS   |   55

TABLE OF CONTENTS
COMPENSATION TABLES

Summary Compensation Table
The following table and accompanying notes provide summary information with respect to total compensation earned or paid by us or our subsidiaries to our NEOs.
Stock Awards
Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
(5)
Name and Principal
Position Year
Year
Salary(1)
Bonus(2)
RSUs
($)(3)
PSUs
($)(4)
Total
($)
All other
Compensation
(6)
Total
Thomas E. McCormick
President and Chief
Executive Officer
2023$890,769$—$1,157,530$3,472,508$4,630,038$1,338,077$145,744$7,004,628
2022833,461475,214475,2141,146,351130,5612,585,587
2021737,019264,2911,644,5861,644,586694,236106,5063,446,638
Kenneth M. Dodgen
Executive Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer
2023$550,385$—$410,025$1,230,020$1,640,045$688,971$122,888$3,002,289
2022518,423231,370231,370594,20486,8441,430,841
2021453,960134,060673,805673,805332,58464,8211,659,230
John M. Perisich
Executive Vice President
Chief Legal and Administrative Officer
2023$550,385$—$461,285$1,383,773$1,845,058$688,971$134,073$3,218,487
2022525,039257,345257,345601,78686,6591,470,829
2021497,029154,933719,659719,659364,13846,1131,781,872
John F. Moreno Jr.
Former Executive Vice President,
Chief Operating Officer
2023$250,193$—$545,023$1,635,013$2,180,036$—$1,595,790$4,026,019
2022593,385272,455272,455680,12267,5401,613,502
2021552,212144,956844,824844,824404,56657,4672,004,025
1
Salary includes all regular wages paid to the NEO and any amount that was voluntarily deferred by the NEO pursuant to our 401(k) Plan.
2
The amounts shown in this column represents the discretionary cash awards earned under the Company’s previous ICP, which is discussed in further detail in the preceding section “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Overview”.
3
The amounts shown in this column represents the aggregate grant date fair value of the RSUs granted by our Board of Directors computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, as described in Note 16 to our audited financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2023. The grant date fair value was based on the market closing price of our stock one day prior to the grant date. This amount reflects our accounting expense to be recognized over the vesting period of the RSUs awarded and does not correspond to the actual value that will be recognized by the NEO. These awards were granted on March 1, 2023.
4
The amounts shown reflect the aggregate grant date fair value of PSUs granted during the fiscal years ended December 31, 2023, calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic718. The grant date fair value is based on the closing price of our common stock on the date of grant of March 1, 2023. Grant date fair value of PSUs was based on probable achievement of the applicable performance goals, and the value ultimately realized by the NEO upon actual vesting of the awards may or may not be equal to this determined value. PSUs vest upon completion of a performance period (subject to continued service), with the amount that vests based on the achievement of certain Company performance conditions. The final amount of earned PSUs can range from 0% to a maximum of 200% (assuming the highest level of performance) of the target amount of unearned PSUs that were granted, and upon settlement, shares of our common stock are issued for each earned PSU. With respect to the PSUs awarded during fiscal year 2023, the grant date fair value, assuming the highest level of Company performance conditions were to be achieved, would be as follows: for Mr. McCormick, $6,945,016; for Mr. Dodgen, $2,460,040; for Mr. Perisich, $2,767,546; and for Mr. Moreno, $3,270,026.
5
Amounts shown in this column reflect the measurable cash awards earned under the Company’s AIP, which is discussed in further detail in the preceding section “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Annual Incentive Plan.”
6
All other compensation for the NEOs includes the following:
YearAuto
Allowance
Personal Use
of Company
Airplane
(1)
Company
Paid Portion
of Health
Care
Benefits
Company Paid
Contributions
to Employee
401k Savings
Account
Separation
Payment
(2)
Total Other
Compensation
Thomas E. McCormick2023$12,000$105,526$15,018$13,200$145,744
Kenneth M. Dodgen2023$12,000$82,670$15,018$13,200$122,888
John M. Perisich2023$12,000$93,855$15,018$13,200$134,073
John F. Moreno Jr2023$5,000$23,829$6,953$10,008
$1,550,000(2)
$1,595,790
1
The Company determined the value of personal aircraft use using the aggregate incremental cost to the Company, including the cost of preparingfuel, trip-related maintenance, crew travel expenses, landing fees, trip related costs and mailingother variable costs. For tax purposes, income is imputed to the executive for non-business travel based on a multiple of the SIFL rates.

56   |   PRIMORIS2024 PROXY STATEMENT

TABLE OF CONTENTS

2
The Company and Mr. Moreno entered into a mutual agreement of separation effective May 22, 2023. Under the terms of the separation agreement, Mr. Moreno was paid $1,550,000, a portion of which was paid through the accelerated vesting of 19,819 RSUs previously awarded to Mr. Moreno in March 2023 under an RSU Agreement. The RSUs were valued at $545,815 calculated pursuant to the share price at market close on May 22, 2023. The remaining $1,004,185 was paid in cash.
Grants of Plan-Based Awards, Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End, Options Exercised and Stock Grants Vested
The following table sets forth the individual grants of plan-based awards to our NEOs during 2023.
Grants of Plan-Based Awards
Estimated Future
Payouts Under Non-Equity
Incentive Plan Awards
(1)
Estimated Future
Payouts Under Equity
Incentive Plan Awards
(2)
All other
Stock
Awards:
Number of
Shares of
Stock or
Units
(3)
Grant
Date Fair
Value
of Stock
Awards
(4)
Grant
Date
Threshold
($)
Target
($)
Maximum
($)
Threshold
(#)
Target
(#)
Maximum
(#)
Thomas E. McCormickN/A01,068,9231,603,384
3/1/20230126,273252,54642,0924,630,038
Kenneth M. DodgenN/A0550,385825,577
3/1/2023044,72889,45614,9101,640,045
John M. PerisichN/A0550,385825,577
3/1/2023050,319100,63816,7741,845,058
John F. Moreno Jr.(5)
N/A0620,673931,010
3/1/2023059,455118,91019,8192,180,036
1
The threshold, target and maximum amounts in these columns show the range of cash payouts targeted for 2023 that could have been earned based on the achievement of performance goals under the AIP, which is discussed in further detail in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Compensation Committee Pay Decisions—Annual Bonuses”. The actual amounts paid are described in the “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column of the “Summary Compensation Table.”
2
The amounts shown represent the number of shares of our common stock that could be earned with respect to PSUs granted under the 2023 long-term incentive plan. The number of PSUs that will become earned and vest, and the resulting number of shares of common stock to be issued, will be determined as soon as administratively practical after completion of the one-year performance periods ending December 31, 2023, December 31, 2024, and December 31, 2025, and the number of shares can range from 0% to a maximum of 200% of the target number. PSUs are described in further detail under Compensation Discussion & Analysis—Long-Term Incentive Plan.
3
The amounts shown represent the number of RSUs that were granted under the 2023 long-term incentive plan. The RSUs awarded vest 25% after year one, 25% after year two and 50% after year three, assuming the NEO continues to meet the requirements for vesting, and the initial vesting occurred on March 1, 2024.
4
The amount shown in this Proxy Statement. Proxiescolumn represents the aggregate grant date fair value of the RSUs and PSUs granted by our Board of Directors computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718.
5
The Company and Mr. Moreno entered into a mutual agreement of separation effective May 22, 2023. As a result, Mr. Moreno was not eligible to receive an AIP bonus for 2023. Under the terms of the separation agreement, the Company accelerated the vesting of the 19,819 RSUs awarded to Mr. Moreno on March 1, 2023, under an RSU Agreement. All other RSUs and PSUs awarded to Mr. Moreno during the term of his employment that were unvested as of May 22, 2023, were forfeited.
Outstanding Awards at Fiscal Year-End(1)
Stock Awards
Number of
Shares or Units
of Stock That
Have Not
Vested (#)
Market Value of
Shares or
Units of Stock
That Have
Not Vested
(2) ($)
Equity Incentive Plan
Awards: Number of
Unearned Shares,
Units or Other
Rights That Have
Not Vested (#)
(3)
Equity Incentive
Plan Awards:
Market or Payout Value
of Unearned Shares,
Units or Other Rights
That Have Not
Vested
(2)(3) ($)
Thomas E. McCormick
85,966(4)
2,854,931189,4086,290,240
Kenneth M. Dodgen
32,888(5)
1,092,21067,0902,228,059
John M. Perisich
35,865(6)
1,191,07775,4742,506,492

2024 PROXY STATEMENTPRIMORIS   |   57

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1
Mr. Moreno was not included in this table as upon his separation from the Company effective May 22, 2023, all equity awards either accelerated or were forfeited.
2
Market value is calculated by multiplying the number of RSUs that have not vested by the closing market price of our Common Stock on December 29, 2023 (the last business day of our most recently completed fiscal year), which was $33.21 per share.
3
The amounts shown represent the maximum number of shares of common stock that could be earned with respect to PSUs granted under the long-term incentive plan, which has a performance period ending December 31, 2024 and 2025. Pursuant to SEC disclosure instructions, because the Company’s performance in previous years on the metrics governing our PSUs granted under the long-term incentive plan exceeded target performance, the number of such unearned PSUs and payout value of such unearned PSUs is calculated assuming maximum performance criteria is achieved. The target number of PSUs granted under the long-term incentive plan that were outstanding as of December 31, 2023, were as follows: Mr. McCormick—94,704; Mr. Dodgen—33,545; and Mr. Perisich—37,737. The actual number of PSUs that will ultimately become earned will be determined as soon as administratively practicable after completion of the performance periods and can range from 0% to a maximum of 200% of the target number.
4
Includes unvested awards of RSUs covering (i) 22,949 shares that vested on March 1, 2024; (ii) 25,441 shares that vest on June 29, 2024; (iii) 16,530 shares that vest on March 1, 2025; and (iv) 21,046 shares that vest on March 1, 2026.
5
Includes unvested awards of RSUs covering (i) 9,878 shares that vested on March 1, 2024; (ii) 8,904 shares that vest on June 29, 2024; (iii) 6,651 shares that vest on March 1, 2025; and (iv) 7,455 shares that vest on March 1, 2026.
6
Includes unvested awards of RSUs covering (i) 11,128 shares that vested on March 1, 2024; (ii) 8,904 shares that vest on June 29, 2024; (iii) 7,446 shares that vest on March 1, 2025; and (iv) 8,387 shares that vest on March 1, 2026.
Stock Vested in 2023
The following table sets forth the number and value of stock awards that vested for the NEOs during 2023.
Stock Awards
Number of Shares
Acquired on
Vesting
Value Realized
on Vesting
(1)
Thomas E. McCormick24,690$703,029
Kenneth M. Dodgen11,194315,932
John M. Perisich12,398348,901
John F. Moreno Jr.29,108799,935
1
Amounts shown reflect the market value of the shares as of the vesting date.
Potential Payments Upon Termination
The Company has an employment agreement with Messrs. McCormick, Dodgen and Perisich. The terms of the employment agreements provide that we must pay certain severance benefits in the event the NEO is terminated by us for any reason other than for “cause”, including salary continuation for a twelve-month period.
The following table shows amounts that would be payable to each of the following NEOs under the scenario that the executive is terminated without cause, or leaves due to death or disability. The table assumes that the terminating event occurred on December 31, 2023, and the NEO returned an executed release of claims (other than if leaving due to death), on which these termination payments are being solicited primarilyconditioned.
Base
Salary
(1)
Equity(2)
Bonus(3)
Health
Care
Benefits
(4)
Accrued
Vacation
(5)
Total
Thomas E. McCormick$1,800,000$2,854,931$1,338,077$25,265$86,538$6,104,811
Kenneth M. Dodgen555,0001,092,210688,97125,26553,3652,414,811
John M. Perisich555,0001,191,077688,97125,26553,3652,513,678
1
Calculated as a lump sum payment equal to 200% of Mr. McCormick’s base salary and one year’s base salary in respect of Messrs. Dodgen and Perisich.
2
Represents accelerated vesting, as of December 31, 2023, of RSUs and PSUs granted to each of the NEOs. The actual number of unearned PSUs that would become earned upon occurrence of the event would be based on the achievement of target performance goals, pro-rated for the number of months of the applicable performance period that have elapsed as of the termination date divided by mail, but the solicitationtotal number of months in the applicable performance period. The value is based on the closing price of our Common Stock at December 29, 2023 (the last business day of our most recently completed fiscal year).
3
In the event of termination without cause, or by maildeath or disability, calculated as a lump sum payment equal to the bonus amount that would have been paid for the calendar year.

58   |   PRIMORIS2024 PROXY STATEMENT

TABLE OF CONTENTS

4
In the event of the executive’s termination without cause or disability, he is entitled to up to one year of healthcare benefits. The amount reflects both the employee and employer portion of health care premium costs.
5
Each executive is allowed an accrual of up to five weeks of vacation. For purposes of this table, it was assumed that the full five weeks would be paid upon termination.
The following table shows amounts that would be payable to each of the following NEOs under the scenario that the executive is terminated for a change in control. The table assumes that the terminating event occurred on December 31, 2023, and the NEO returned an executed release of claims, on which these termination payments are conditioned.
Base
Salary
(1)
Equity(2)
Bonus(3)
Health
Care
Benefits
(4)
Accrued
Vacation
(5)
Total
Thomas E. McCormick$2,250,000$6,000,051$2,672,307$63,162$86,538$10,298,337
Kenneth M. Dodgen1,110,0002,206,2391,100,77050,52953,3654,520,903
John M. Perisich1,110,0002,444,3231,100,77050,52953,3654,758,987
1
Calculated as a lump sum payment equal to 250% of Mr. McCormick’s base salary and 200% of Messrs. Dodgen’s and Perisich’s base salary.
2
Represents accelerated vesting, as of December 31, 2023, of RSUs and PSUs granted to each of the NEOs. The actual number of unearned PSUs that would become earned upon occurrence of the event would be based on the forecasted achievement of performance goals for the remainder of the performance periods and can range from 0% to a maximum of 200% (assuming the highest level of performance) of the target amount of unearned PSUs. The amounts included assume performance at target, without reference to forecasted achievement. The value is based on the closing price of our Common Stock at December 29, 2023 (the last business day of our most recently completed fiscal year).
3
Calculated as a lump sum payment equal to 250% of Mr. McCormick’s target bonus amount that would have been paid for the calendar year and 200% of Messrs. Dodgen’s and Perisich’s target bonus amount that would have been paid for the calendar year.
4
Mr. McCormick is entitled up to 30 months of healthcare benefits and Messrs. Dodgen and Perisich are entitled up to 24 months of healthcare benefits. The amount reflects both the employee and employer portion of health care premium costs.
5
Each executive is allowed an accrual of up to five weeks of vacation. For purposes of this table, it was assumed that the full five weeks would be paid upon termination.
On May 22, 2023, the Company and Mr. Moreno reached a mutual agreement of employment separation, pursuant to which Mr. Moreno would no longer serve as Chief Operating Officer of Primoris effective as of May 22, 2023. In connection with Mr. Moreno’s employment separation, the Company and Mr. Moreno entered into a mutual agreement of separation and general release dated May 25, 2023 (the “Separation Agreement”). The payments made under the Separation Agreement were negotiated between the parties in connection with the mutual agreement of separation and are not equal to amounts that would have been paid for either: (1) a termination without cause or resignation with good reason; or (2) a termination for cause or resignation without good reason. Under the Separation Agreement, Mr. Moreno was paid $1,550,000, a portion of which was paid through the accelerated vesting of 19,819 RSUs previously awarded to Mr. Moreno in March 2023 under an RSU Agreement. The RSUs were valued at $545,815 calculated pursuant to the share price at market close on May 22, 2023. The remaining $1,004,185 was paid in cash. All other RSUs and PSUs previously awarded to Mr. Moreno during the term of his employment that were unvested as of May 22, 2023, were forfeited.
Pay Ratio Disclosure
We are providing the following information to comply with Section 953(b) of Dodd-Frank and Item 402(u) of Regulation S-K. For 2023, our last completed fiscal year, we determined the ratio of the annual total compensation of our CEO relative to the annual total compensation of our median employee. We are using the same median employee for our 2023 pay ratio as we used in 2022. In this regard, we do not reasonably believe there have been changes in our employee population or compensation that would significantly change our pay ratio. For purposes of reporting annual total compensation and the ratio of annual total compensation of the CEO to the median employee, both the CEO’s and median employee’s annual total compensation were calculated consistent with the disclosure requirement of executive compensation under the Summary Compensation Table.
After applying the methodology described above, our median employee compensation using the Summary Compensation Table requirements was $66,126. Our CEO’s compensation as disclosed in the Summary Compensation Table was $7,004,628. Based on this information, the estimate of the ratio of compensation for our CEO to the median employee for 2023 was 106:1. This ratio is specific to our Company and may not be comparable to any ratio disclosed by another company.

2024 PROXY STATEMENTPRIMORIS   |   59

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Retirement Plans
We sponsor multiple defined contribution plans for eligible employees not covered by collective bargaining agreements. Our plans include various features such as voluntary employee pre-tax and Roth-based contributions and matching contributions made by us. The plans do not provide any benefits for any executives other than those provided to all employees.
In May 2023, we adopted a non-qualified deferred compensation plan under which eligible Directors and key employees may defer their receipt of certain cash compensation. This plan is an unfunded and unsecured compensation arrangement. Individuals participating in the plan may allocate deferred cash amounts among a group of notional accounts that mirror the gains and losses of various investment alternatives. Generally, participants receive distributions of deferred balances based on predetermined payout schedules or other events.
Equity Compensation Plans
Equity Incentive Plans. In May 2013, the stockholders approved, and the Company adopted the 2013 Equity Incentive Plan. In May of 2023, the stockholders approved, and the Company adopted the 2023 Equity Incentive Plan. Upon the adoption of the 2023 Equity Incentive Plan, awards were no longer granted under the 2013 Equity Incentive Plan, and the only plan pursuant to which the Company may currently grant new equity-based awards is the 2023 Equity Incentive Plan.
The principal purpose of our equity incentive plans is to provide incentives for our officers, employees and consultants, as well as the officers, employees and consultants of any of our subsidiaries. In addition to awards made to officers, employees or consultants, the equity incentive plans permit us to grant options or other equity securities to our Directors.
2022 Employee Stock Purchase Plan. In 2022, our stockholders adopted the 2022 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “ESPP”), under which eligible full-time employees can purchase shares of our common stock at a discount on a semi-annual basis.
The following table gives information about our Common Stock that may be followed-up by solicitation in person,issued under our existing equity compensation plans, including upon the exercise of options, warrants, and rights, or by telephone or facsimile, byupon settlement of RSUs, as of December 31, 2023, pursuant to the Company’s existing equity compensation plans.
Plan category
Number of securities to be
issued upon exercise of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights
under equity
plan
(1)
(a)
Weighted-average
exercise price per share of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights
(b)
Number of securities
remaining available
for future issuance
under equity
compensation
plans (excluding
securities
reflected in
column (a))
(2)
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders931,743$—7,198,701
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders
Total931,743$—7,198,701
1
Equity awards listed represent RSUs and PSUs awarded through the RSU and PSU Agreements under the 2013 and 2023 Equity Plan.
2
The amounts shown include 6,221,913 shares of common stock remaining available for issuance under our regular employees without additional2023 Equity Incentive Plan. The amounts shown also include 976,788 shares of common stock remaining available for purchase under the ESPP, including shares subject to purchase during the current purchase period.

60   |   PRIMORIS2024 PROXY STATEMENT

TABLE OF CONTENTS

2023 PAY VERSUS PERFORMANCE DISCLOSURES
The table below includes information related to compensation for such proxy solicitation activitythe Company’s Principal Executive Officer (“PEO”) and Non-PEO named executive officers, as well as financial performance, during 2020 through 2023.
This disclosure has been prepared in accordance with Item 402(v) of Regulation S-K under the Exchange Act and does not necessarily reflect value actually realized by the executives or by a proxy solicitation firm. We will reimburse brokers, bankshow our Compensation Committee evaluates compensation decisions in light of Company or individual performance. For discussion of how our Compensation Committee seeks to align pay with performance when making compensation decisions, please review Compensation Discussion and other custodiansAnalysis beginning on page 50.
Year (a)
Summary
Compensation
Table Total for

PEO(1) (b)
Compensation
Actually
Paid to

PEO(1)(2) (c)
Average
Summary
Compensation
Table Total for
Non-PEO
NEOs
(1) (d)
Average
Compensation
Actually
Paid to
Non-PEO
NEOs
(1)(2) (e)
Value of Initial Fixed $100
Investment Based on:
Net
Income (h)
Operating
Income (i)
Total
Shareholder
Return
(3) (f)
2023 Peer
Group Total
Shareholder
Return
(4) (g)
2022 Peer
Group Total
Shareholder
Return
2023$7,004,628$8,471,612$3,415,598$4,008,600$155.60$184.08$390.28$126,145$253,073
2022$2,585,857$2,406,439$1,505,057$1,419,644$101.97$155.90$262.29$133,021$195,338
2021$3,446,638$3,072,011$1,815,042$1,312,950$110.16$168.84$219.28$115,739$170,151
2020$2,151,151$2,241,376$1,303,961$1,236,365$125.72$122.63$142.42$104,983$163,949
1
Mr. McCormick served as our PEO for the full year for each of 2023, 2022, 2021, and nominees2020. For each of 2023, 2022, 2021 and 2020 our non-PEO NEOs included Mr. Dodgen, Mr. Perisich and Mr. Moreno.
2
For each of 2023, 2022, 2021, and 2020, the values included in this column for their reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in sending proxy materialsthe compensation actually paid to our stockholders.

Stockholder proposal deadlinePEO and the average compensation actually paid to our non-PEO NEOs reflected the following adjustments to the values included in column (b) and column (d), respectively:

Mr. McCormick
2023
Summary Compensation Table Total for PEO (column b)$7,004,628
- Summary Compensation Table “Stock Awards” column value$(4,630,038)
+ Year-end fair value of equity awards granted in the covered year that
are outstanding and unvested at year-end
$5,591,402
+/- Year-over-year change in fair value of equity awards granted in
prior years that are outstanding and unvested at year-end
$494,460
+/- Year-over-year change as of the vesting date in fair value of equity
awards granted in any prior years which vested during the covered fiscal year
$11,160
Compensation Actually Paid to PEO (column c)$8,471,612
Average for Non-PEO NEOs
2023
Summary Compensation Table Average Total for NON-PEO NEOs (column d)$3,415,598
- Summary Compensation Table “Stock Awards” column value$(1,133,028)
+ Year-end fair value of equity awards granted in the covered year that are outstanding and unvested at year-end$1,402,912
+/- Year-over- year change in fair value of equity awards granted in prior years that are outstanding and unvested at year-end$139,256
+ Vesting date fair value of equity awards granted and vested in the covered year$181,938
+/- Year-over-year change as of the vesting date in fair value of equity awards granted in any prior years which vested during the covered fiscal year$1,923
Average Compensation Actually Paid to NON-PEO NEOs (column e)$4,008,600
Valuation assumptions used to calculate fair values did not materially differ from those used to calculate fair values at the 2017 Annual Meeting

time of grant as reflected in our Summary Compensation Table amounts.


2024 PROXY STATEMENTPRIMORIS   |   61

TABLE OF CONTENTS

3
Pursuant to SEC rules, total stockholder return (TSR) amounts reported assume an initial fixed investment of $100 and that all dividends were reinvested. The Company and peer group total stockholder return for 2020 represents the one-year return for January 1, 2020 to December 31, 2020; for 2021 the returns shown represents the two-year return from January 1, 2020 to December 31, 2021, for 2022 the returns shown represents the three-year return from January 1, 2020 to December 31, 2022 and for 2023 the return shown represents the four-year return from January 1, 2020 to December 31, 2023.
4
For purposes of this pay versus performance disclosure, our peer group consists of five companies which are: MasTec, Inc., MYR Group, Inc., Dycom Industries, Inc., Sterling Construction Company, Inc., and Granite Construction, Inc. This Peer Group is consistent with the peer group used in Item 5 of our 2023 Form 10-K. The Peer Group was modified in 2023 to replace Quanta Services, Inc. and Matrix Service Company with Dycom Industries, Inc. and MYR Group, Inc. as the overall composition of our business has changed and we believe this new peer group more closely resembles us from both an operations and market capitalization perspective.
Relationship Between Pay and Performance
The following graphical comparisons provide descriptions of the relationships between certain figures included in the Pay Versus Performance table for each of 2023, 2022, 2021, and 2020, including: (a) comparisons between the (i) compensation actually paid to the PEO and the average compensation actually paid to our non-PEO NEOs and (ii) each of Total Shareholder Return, Net Income and Operating Income; and (b) a comparison between our cumulative total shareholder return and the total shareholder return of the Peer Group.
Relationship Between Compensation Actually Paid and Total Shareholder Return
[MISSING IMAGE: bc_relations-4c.jpg]
Relationship Between Compensation Actually Paid and (i) Net Income and (ii) Operating Income
[MISSING IMAGE: bc_netincome-4c.jpg]

62   |   PRIMORIS2024 PROXY STATEMENT

TABLE OF CONTENTS

The following table lists the financial and non-financial performance measures that we believe represent the most important performance measures used to link compensation actually paid to our PEO and non-PEO NEOs for 2023 to our performance:
Net Income
Operating Income
Adjusted EBITDA
New Business Generated
Total Recordable Incident Rate

2024 PROXY STATEMENTPRIMORIS   |   63

TABLE OF CONTENTS

STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS FOR OUR 2025 ANNUAL MEETING
The rules of the SEC establish the eligibility requirements and the procedures that must be followed for inclusion of a stockholder’s proposal in a public company’s proxy materials. Under those rules, proposals submitted for inclusion in our 20172025 proxy materials must be received on or before the close of business on the day that is 120 days prior to March 31, 2017.November 22, 2024. Proposals for inclusion in our 20172025 proxy materials must comply with the procedures set forth in Rule 14a-8 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”).

In addition to the requirements of the SEC, ourAct.

Our Amended and Restated Bylaws (“Bylaws”) provide that in order for nominations of persons for election to the Board and a proposal of business to be properly brought before an Annual Meeting of Stockholders, it must be either: (1) specified in the notice of the meeting given by us, (2) otherwise brought before the meeting by or at the direction of our Board, or (3) properly brought before the meeting by a stockholder entitled to vote at the meeting who complies with the following notice procedures: (i) the stockholder must give timely notice thereof in writing of the nomination or business to be brought before such meeting to our Secretary, and (ii) such business must be a proper matter for stockholder action under the Delaware General Corporation Law. In addition, stockholders who intend to solicit proxies in reliance on the SEC’s universal proxy rule for Director nominees submitted under the advance notice requirements of our by-laws must comply with the additional requirements of Rule 14a-19, including delivery of written notice that sets forth all information required by Rule 14a-19(b) under the Exchange Act. Our Bylaws provide that to be timely, a stockholder’s notice must be delivered to our Secretary at our principal executive offices not less than 45 days prior to the first anniversary of the date on which we first mailed our proxy materials for the preceding year’s Annual Meeting. If the date of the subsequent year’s Annual Meeting of Stockholders is changed by more than 30 days from the date of the prior year’s meeting, notice by the stockholder for the subsequent year’s Annual Meeting must be delivered to our Secretary within a “reasonable time” prior to our mailing of the proxy materials for the subsequent year’s Annual Meeting of Stockholders. We expect to announceTo be properly brought before the date of the 20172025 Annual Meeting, of Stockholders in early 2017.

If a stockholder proposes to nominate for election or reelection a director, the stockholder’s notice must include all information relating to such director nominee that is required to be disclosed in solicitation of proxies for election of directors in an election contest, or otherwise required, in each case, pursuant to Regulation 14A and Rule 14a-11 under the Exchange Act.

For any business that a stockholder desires to bring before an annual meeting, the stockholder’s notice must comply with all applicable requirements of the Exchange Act and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder, and must include the following:

·                  a brief description of the proposal and the reasons for the proposal;

·                  the number of shares of Common Stock which are owned beneficially and of record by such stockholder or such beneficial owner;

·                  a representation that the stockholder is a holder of record of Common Stock entitled to vote at such meeting and intends to appear in person or by proxy at the meeting to propose such business or nomination; and

·                  a representation whether the stockholder or the beneficial owner intends or is part of a group which intends (a) to deliver a proxy statement and/or form of proxy to holders of at least the percentage of our outstanding capital stock required to approve or adopt the proposal or elect the nominee and/or (b) otherwise to solicit proxies from stockholders in support of such proposal or nomination.

received no later than February 5, 2025.

Any stockholder who intends to present a proposal or nominate persons for election to the Board at the 20172025 Annual Meeting of Stockholders must send the proposalnotice, with all required information, via standard mail, overnight delivery or other courier service, to Primoris Services Corporation, 2100 McKinney Avenue,2300 N. Field Street, Suite 1500,1900, Dallas, Texas 75201, Attention: Secretary.

The Nominating


64   |   PRIMORIS2024 PROXY STATEMENT

TABLE OF CONTENTS
OTHER MATTERS

This Proxy Statement, being mailed and Corporate Governance Committee will consider all stockholder recommendations for candidates formade available electronically (on our Company website at www.prim.com) to stockholders on or about March 22, 2024, is being sent to you by the Board which should be sent to the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, c/o Secretary,of Directors (the “Board”) of Primoris Services Corporation 2100 McKinney Avenue, Suite 1500, Dallas, Texas 75201.

in connection with our 2024 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Annual Meeting”). The NominatingAnnual Meeting will be held virtually at 9:00 a.m. Central Time, on Wednesday, May 1, 2024. You are cordially invited to attend the Annual Meeting and Corporate Governance Committeeare requested to vote on the proposals described in this Proxy Statement.

Purpose of the Annual Meeting
At the Annual Meeting, our stockholders will evaluate recommendationsvote to elect nine Directors to hold office for Director nominees submitted by Directors,a one-year term expiring at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held in 2025, or until a successor is elected and qualified, will vote on an advisory, non-binding basis, on the Company’s executive compensation program and will vote to ratify the appointment of Moss Adams LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2024. In addition, management will respond to any questions from stockholders.
Materials provided
The Board is sending you this Proxy Statement and the enclosed proxy card in order to solicit your proxy to vote your shares at the Annual Meeting. As a stockholder, you are invited to attend the meeting and are entitled to vote on the items of business described in this Proxy Statement.
Annual Meeting attendance
All stockholders as of March 11, 2024 (the “Record Date”), or qualifying stockholderstheir duly appointed proxies, may attend the Annual Meeting. You will need to register to be able to attend the Annual Meeting virtually. Gaining admission to the Annual Meeting depends on how your stock ownership is recorded with our transfer agent, Continental Stock Transfer & Trust Company (the “Transfer Agent”). If your stock is held in the same manner, usingname of a bank, broker or other holder of record and you plan to attend the criteria stated aboveAnnual Meeting, please obtain a legal proxy from your broker, bank, or other nominee and discussedprovide when registering for the virtual meeting. If your stock is registered directly in your name with our Transfer Agent, you need to provide the control number found on page 14your proxy card when registering for the virtual meeting.
Voting at the Annual Meeting
Holders of our common stock (“Common Stock”) as of the close of business on the Record Date will be entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. On the Record Date, there were 53,618,814 shares of Common Stock outstanding, each of which is entitled to one vote with respect to each matter to be voted on at the Annual Meeting. There is no stockholder statutory right of appraisal or dissent with respect to any matters to be voted on at the Annual Meeting.
Quorum requirement
The presence at the Annual Meeting, virtually or by proxy, of the holders of a majority of the voting power of all outstanding shares of Common Stock entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of business. Proxies marked as abstaining (including proxies containing broker non-votes) on any matter to be acted upon by stockholders will be treated as present at the meeting for purposes of determining a quorum.
Stockholder of record & beneficial owner
All stockholders are invited to attend the Annual Meeting. All shares that have been properly voted and not revoked will be voted at the Annual Meeting. Most of our stockholders hold their shares through a stockbroker, bank or other nominee rather than directly in their own name. As summarized below, there are distinctions between shares held of record and those owned beneficially.

2024 PROXY STATEMENTPRIMORIS   |   65

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Stockholder of Record
If your shares are registered directly in your name with the Transfer Agent, you are considered the stockholder of record, and these proxy materials are being sent directly to you by us. As the stockholder of record, you have the right to grant your voting proxy directly to us or to vote virtually at the Annual Meeting. We have enclosed a proxy card for you to use.
Voting electronically at the Annual Meeting—You may vote your shares electronically at the Annual Meeting by visiting the link provided during the Annual Meeting while the polls are open and providing the control number found on your proxy card. Even if you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, we recommend that you vote your shares in advance as described below so that your vote will be counted if you later decide not to attend the Annual Meeting.
Voting without attending the Annual Meeting—Please complete and properly sign and date the accompanying proxy card and return it to the Transfer Agent in the accompanying pre-addressed envelope.
Changing your vote after returning your proxy card—You can revoke your proxy before it is exercised at the meeting by:

delivering written notice of revocation of the proxy to our Secretary prior to the Annual Meeting;

executing and delivering a later dated proxy card to our Secretary; or

attending and voting electronically at the Annual Meeting.
Beneficial Owner of Shares
If your shares are held in a stock brokerage account, by a bank or other nominee, you are considered the beneficial owner of shares held in “street name” and these proxy materials are being forwarded to you by your broker, bank or nominee who is considered, with respect to your shares, the stockholder of record. As the beneficial owner, you have the right to direct the stockholder of record how to vote your shares. Your broker, bank or nominee has enclosed a voting instruction card for your use.
Voting without attending the Annual Meeting—Please follow the instructions provided by your broker, bank or nominee. You may vote by mail by completing, signing and dating the voting instruction card provided by your broker, bank or nominee and mailing the card to such entities in the accompanying pre-addressed envelopes.
Changing your vote after returning your proxy card—You may submit new voting instructions by contacting your broker, bank or other nominee. You may also vote electronically at the Annual Meeting by following the instructions in the next section below.
Voting electronically at the Annual Meeting—You may vote electronically at the Annual Meeting by visiting the link provided during the Annual Meeting while the polls are open and providing your virtual control number assigned to you in the registration confirmation email.
Required votes to approve each item
Each outstanding share of Common Stock is entitled “Selectionto one vote on each proposal at the Annual Meeting. All matters require the existence of Board Nominees”.a quorum at the Annual Meeting. All proposals require an affirmative vote of the majority of shares virtually present at the Annual Meeting or represented by proxy, and entitled to vote on the subject matter other than the election of Directors, and Director nomineeswhich is determined by a plurality of shares virtually present at the Annual Meeting or represented by proxy. The individual receiving the largest number of votes for each position will be requiredelected.
In voting on Proposal 1, the election of Directors, you may vote “FOR” the nominee or your vote may be “WITHHELD” with respect to submitthe nominee. In voting on any other proposal, you may vote “FOR”, “AGAINST”, or “ABSTAIN”. A properly executed proxy marked “ABSTAIN” with respect to any other proposal will not be voted, although it will be counted for purposes of determining whether there is a completed directors’quorum. An abstention will have the effect of a negative vote on that matter. If you are a beneficial owner, shares represented by broker non-votes (when the broker indicates they do not have their customer’s direction on how to vote, nor has discretionary authority on how to vote) will be counted in determining whether there is a quorum, but will not be counted as votes cast on any proposal where the broker indicated they do not have discretionary voting authority. Brokers and officers’ questionnaireother nominees who are New York Stock Exchange members are expected to have discretionary voting power only for Proposal 3, the ratification of Moss Adams LLP as partour independent registered public accounting firm, but not for any other proposals. As a result, if you do not provide specific voting instructions to your record holder, New York Stock Exchange rules will allow the record holder to vote only on Proposal 3, and not on Proposals 1 or 2.

66   |   PRIMORIS2024 PROXY STATEMENT

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Inspector of elections
Our Executive Vice President, Chief Legal and Administrative Officer and Secretary, John M. Perisich, will act as Inspector of Elections and oversee the voting results. The Inspector of Elections will also determine the presence of a quorum.
Voting results of the nominating process. AtAnnual Meeting
We will announce preliminary voting results at the discretionAnnual Meeting and will publish final results in a Current Report on a Form 8-K filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) within four business days of the NominatingAnnual Meeting.
Board recommendations
The Board recommends a vote:

FOR Proposal No. 1, to elect each of the nine director nominees to hold office for a one-year term expiring at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held in 2025 or until a successor is elected and Corporate Governance Committee,qualified.

FOR Proposal No. 2, to approve, in an advisory, non-binding vote, the processCompany’s named executive officer compensation.

FOR Proposal No. 3, to ratify the appointment of Moss Adams LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2024.
Unless you give other instructions on your proxy card, the individual(s) named as proxy holder on the proxy card will vote in accordance with the recommendations of the Board.
Expense of soliciting proxies
We will pay the costs for the solicitation of proxies, including the cost of preparing and mailing this Proxy Statement. Proxies are being solicited primarily by mail, but the solicitation by mail may also include interviewsbe followed-up by solicitation in person, or by telephone or facsimile, by our regular employees without additional compensation for such proxy solicitation activity or by a proxy solicitation firm. We will reimburse brokers, banks and additional backgroundother custodians and reference checksnominees for non-incumbent nominees.

their reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred in sending proxy materials to our stockholders.

Information about Primoris Services Corporation

We maintain a corporate website at www.prim.com. Visitors to the Investor Relations section of our website can view and print copies of our SEC filings, including this Proxy Statement and Forms 10-K, 10-Q and 8-K. Copies of the charters for our Audit Committee, Compensation Committee, and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, and Strategy and Risk Committee, as well as our Code of Ethics,Conduct, our Corporate Governance Guidelines, and our Sustainability information are also available through our website. Additional Company charters and policies are also available such as our Cyber Security Steering Committee Charter, Human Rights Policy, Corporate Environmental Policy, Diversity & Inclusion Committee Charter and ESG Committee Charter. Alternatively, stockholders may obtain, without charge, copies of all of these documents by writing to Investor Relations at the Company’s headquarters. Please note that the information contained on our website is not incorporated by reference in, nor considered to be a part of, this Proxy Statement.

Documents not incorporated by reference into this Proxy Statement

The Audit Committee Report and the Compensation Committee Report are not deemed filed with the SEC and, in addition to the information included under the section entitled “2023 Pay Versus Performance Disclosures”, shall not be deemed incorporated by reference into any prior or future filings made by us under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), or the ExchangeSecurities Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) except to the extent that we specifically, and in writing, incorporate such information by reference.

MATTERS TO COME BEFORE THE MEETING

PROPOSAL 1—ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

(Item 1 on Proxy Card)

General Information

We currently have a classified Board consisting of seven members.  Four of our Directors Web links throughout this document are independent Directors as determined under NASDAQ listing rules. Our Directors are divided into three classes (Class A, Class Bprovided for convenience only, and Class C). Directors in each class are elected to serve for three-year terms that expire in successive years.  The terms of the Class B Directors Stephen C. Cook and Peter J. Moerbeek expire at the upcoming 2016 Annual Meeting.

In February 2016, the Board of Directors’ Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee recommended to the Board the nomination of Stephen C. Cook and Peter J. Moerbeek for re-election as Class B Director for three-year terms expiring at the 2019 Annual Meeting, or until their successors are elected and qualified or their earlier death, resignation or removal. These recommendations were adopted unanimously by the Board. If the nominees become unavailable for any reason, or if any vacancy occurs before the election at the 2016 Annual Meeting (although we know of no reason to anticipate that this will occur), the proxies may be voted for such substitute nominees as the Board may designate.

Each nominee has consented to being named in this Proxy Statement and has agreed to serve if elected.  If a quorum is present and voting, the nominees receiving the highest number of votes will be elected as Class B Directors. Abstentions and broker non-votes have no effect on the result of the vote; however, abstentions and broker non-votes will be counted as shares present for purposes of determining the presence of a quorum.

OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR STEPHEN C. COOK AND PETER J. MOERBEEK AS CLASS B DIRECTORS TO HOLD OFFICE UNTIL OUR ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS TO BE HELD IN 2019 OR UNTIL THEIR RESPECTIVE SUCCESSORS ARE DULY ELECTED AND QUALIFIED OR UPON THEIR EARLIER DEATH, RESIGNATION OR REMOVAL.

Information Regarding Directors and Director Nominees

The following table sets forth information regarding our current Directors, including the Class B Director nominees up for election at the Annual Meeting. There are no family relationships among any Directors, nominees or named executive officers of the Company. To our knowledge, there are no material proceedings to which any Director or executive officer is a party adverse to the Company or has a material interest adverse to the Company.

Name

 

Position with our Company

 

Age

 

Director
Since

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Class B Directors whose terms will expire at the 2016 Annual Meeting and are re-nominated for terms ending at the 2019 Annual Meeting:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Stephen C. Cook

 

Independent Lead Director

 

66

 

2008

Peter J. Moerbeek

 

Director,
Executive Vice President,
Chief Financial Officer

 

68

 

2008

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Class C Directors whose term will expire at the 2017 Annual Meeting:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Robert A. Tinstman

 

Independent Director

 

69

 

2009

David L. King

 

Director,
President and Chief Executive Officer

 

63

 

2015

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Class A Directors whose terms will expire at the 2018 Annual Meeting:

 

 

 

 

 

 

Brian Pratt

 

Director and Chairman of the Board

 

64

 

2008

Thomas E. Tucker

 

Independent Director

 

73

 

2008

Peter C. Brown

 

Independent Director

 

72

 

2009

The person named in the enclosed proxy card will vote to elect Stephen C. Cook and Peter J. Moerbeek as Class B Directors, unless you withhold this authority to vote for the election of any or all of the nominees by marking the proxy to that effect.

Director Biographies and Special Skills

Directors with Terms Expiring at the 2016 Annual Meeting (Class B)

STEPHEN C. COOK has served as one of our Directors since July 2008 and in May 2010 was appointed by the Board as Lead Director of the Company. Since 1990 he has served as President and principal stockholder of Fieldstone Partners, a Houston, Texas-based investment banking firm, focused primarily on corporate merger and acquisition advisory services. He has over 30 years of experience in the investment banking business, including 10 years with Rotan Mosle, Inc., a Texas-based regional investment firm and underwriter where he served as co-head of the corporate finance department and as a director of the firm. Mr. Cook received an A.B. in Economics from Princeton University and an MBA from Harvard Business School.

We believe that Mr. Cook’s qualifications to servecontained on our Board include his business and investment banking experience and his wealth of knowledge of mergers and acquisitions. The Board has determined that Mr. Cook meets the NASDAQ rules for independence andwebsite or other web links is therefore an independent Director.

PETER J. MOERBEEK was named our Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer effective February 6, 2009. He has served as one of our Directors since July 2008 and was Chairman of the Audit Committee until February 2009. From 2006 through February 2009, he was the Chief Executive Officer and a founder of a private equity-funded company engaged in the acquisition and operation of water and wastewater utilities. From August 1995 to June 2006, Mr. Moerbeek held several positions with publicly traded Southwest Water Company, a California based company which provides water and wastewater services, including director from 2001 to 2006; President and Chief Operating Officer from 2004 to 2006; President of the Services Group from 1997 to 2006; Secretary from 1995 to 2004; and Chief Financial Officer from 1995 to 2002. From 1989 to 1995, Mr. Moerbeek was the Vice President of Finance and Operations for publicly traded Pico Products, Inc., a manufacturer and distributor of cable television equipment. Mr. Moerbeek received a B.S. in Electrical Engineering and an MBA from the University of Washington and is a licensed certified public accountant.

We believe that Mr. Moerbeek’s qualifications to serve on our Board include his prior experience as the chief operating officer and the chief financial officer of a NASDAQ listed company, as well as his in-depth knowledge and understanding of generally accepted accounting principles, experience in analyzing financial statements, understanding of internal control over financial reporting and his understanding and knowledge of public company rules and regulations.

Nominee whose Term Expires at the 2017 Annual Meeting (Class C)

ROBERT A. TINSTMAN was appointed a Director on December 18, 2009. Mr. Tinstman was the former president of Tinstman and Associates, LLC. From 1974 to 1999, Mr. Tinstman was employed by Morrison Knudsen and served as its President/Chief Executive Officer for the period 1995 to 1999. Mr. Tinstman was the Executive Chairman of James Construction Group from 2002 to 2007. Mr. Tinstman is a registered Professional Engineer in the state of Idaho. He graduated from University of Wisconsin, Platteville, with a B.S., Mining Engineering in 1968.

Mr. Tinstman is also a director on the following public company boards: IDA CORP, Inc., where he is chairman of the board; Home Federal Bancorp, where he was a member of the audit committee and chairman of the compensation committee until May 2014; and CNA Surety, where he was a member of the audit committee and chairman of the compensation committee until June 2011.

We believe that Mr. Tinstman’s qualifications to serve on our Board include his experience as President and Chief Executive Officer of one of the largest construction companies in the United States, as well as his wealth of knowledge of business systems and construction operations. The Board determined that Mr. Tinstman meets the NASDAQ rules for independence and is therefore an independent Director.

DAVID L. KING has served as our President and Chief Executive Officer since August 1, 2015 and has served as one of our Directors since May 2015.  Mr. King directs strategy, establishes goals and oversees our operations.  Prior to that, Mr. King was our Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer since March 2014.  Prior to joining Primoris, Mr. King spent several years at Chicago Bridge & Iron (“CB&I”), most recently as President of Lummus Engineered Products.  From 2010 to 2013 he was President of CB&I Project Engineering & Construction based in The Hague, Netherlands responsible for P&L operations worldwide.  From 2009 to 2010 he was Group Vice President for Downstream Operations for CB&I Lummus located in The Woodlands, Texas.  Mr. King also managed and helped establish the Global Services Group for CB&I in 2008 to 2009.  He has extensive EPF&C (Engineering, Procurement, Fabrication and Construction) industry experience in energy-related projects, Liquified Natural Gas (“LNG”), offshore, pipelines, refining, petrochemicals, gas processing, oil sands, synthesis gas and gas-to-liquids. Mr. King received his bachelor’s degree in Mechanical Engineering from Texas Tech University, an MBA from the University of Texas, Tyler, and an Advanced Executive Management Degree from Insead University in Fontainebleau, France.

Mr. King has a wealth of knowledge and experience in the industry and our business and has obtained in-depth knowledge of our employees, culture, competitors and the effect on our business of various government policies. We believe that his long history and experience demonstrate that Mr. King is well qualified to serve on our Board.

Directors with Terms Expiring at the 2018 Annual Meeting (Class A)

BRIAN PRATT has been a Director and our Chairman since July 2008.  He served as our President and Chief Executive Officer from July 2008 through July 31, 2015.  He also holds the non-employee position of Senior Strategic Advisor.  Since 1983, he served as the President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Primoris and its predecessor, ARB, Inc., a California corporation. Prior to July 2008, Mr. Pratt was the majority owner of Primoris. Mr. Pratt has over 35 years of hands-on operations and management experience in the construction industry. Mr. Pratt completed four years of courses in Civil Engineering at California Polytechnic College in Pomona, California.

Mr. Pratt has an intimate knowledge of our business, employees, culture, competitors and the effect on our business of various government policies. We believe that his long history and experience with Primoris, his significant ownership position in the Company and his in-depth knowledge of the construction industry demonstrate that Mr. Pratt is well qualified to serve on our Board.

THOMAS E. TUCKER has served as one of our Directors since July 2008. He is currently Chairman of Pennhill Land Company, a real estate development and investment company, where he has worked since he founded the company in 1983. He served as a board member of RSI Holding Corporation, a privately held national manufacturer of cabinets for homes, from 2002 to November 2008. Prior to that, he served as an advisory board member of ORCO Block Company, a Southern California manufacturer of block products, and Gemini Investors, a Boston based Investment Capital firm. Mr. Tucker also serves as a board member of the Segerstrom Center for the Arts in Orange County, California. Mr. Tucker received a B.S. in Business from the University of Southern California.

We believe that Mr. Tucker’s experience as a founder and executive officer of a large real estate development company, his expertise in the real estate development business and his directorships of both private and public companies qualify him to serve on our Board. The Board determined that Mr. Tucker meets the NASDAQ rules for independence and is therefore an independent Director.

PETER C. BROWN joined our Board on February 6, 2009. He has served from 1974 to 2005 as President at Brown Armstrong Accountancy Corporation, a regional provider of tax, audit, consulting and business services headquartered in Bakersfield, California and is a retired partner. Mr. Brown received a B.S. in Accounting from the University of Arizona. He is a member of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, the California Society of Certified Public Accountants and the Colorado Society of Certified Public Accountants.

We believe that Mr. Brown’s qualifications to serve on our Board include his in-depth knowledge and understanding of generally accepted accounting principles, his background in tax regulations, experience in preparing, auditing and analyzing financials statements and understanding of the responsibilities and functions of audit committees. The Board determined that Mr. Brown meets the NASDAQ rules for independence and is therefore an independent Director.

PROPOSAL 2—RATIFICATION OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

(Item 2 on Proxy Card)

General

We are asking the stockholders to ratify the Audit Committee’s appointment of Moss Adams, LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2016. The firm is a registered public accounting firm with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”), as required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and the rules of the PCAOB. In the event the stockholders fail to ratify the appointment, the Audit Committee will reconsider this appointment. If the appointment is ratified, the Audit Committee, in its discretion, may direct the appointment of a different independent registered public accounting firm at any time during the year if the Audit Committee determines that such a change would be in the best interests of the Company and our stockholders.

A Moss Adams, LLP representative is expected to attend the 2016 Annual Meeting of the Stockholders. The representative will have an opportunity to make a statement if he or she desires to do so and will be available to respond to appropriate stockholder questions.

The affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of Common Stock present, in person or by proxy, entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting is required to approve the ratification of the appointment of Moss Adams, LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2016.

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS A VOTE FOR THE RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF MOSS ADAMS, LLP AS OUR INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR 2016.

Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Fees and Services

The following is a summary of the fees billed for professional services for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014:

Fee Category 

 

Calendar Year
2015 Fees

 

Calendar Year
2014 Fees

 

Audit Fees (1)

 

$

1,183,266

 

$

841,000

 

Audit Related Fees (2)

 

199,590

 

152,000

 

Tax Fees (3)

 

127,043

 

190,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total Fees

 

$

1,509,899

 

$

1,183,000

 


(1)                         Fees for audit services consist of the fees associated with the annual audit, for quarterly SAS 100 reviews and reviews of our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q.

(2)                         Audit related fees include proxy filings, registration statements and standalone audits for Primoris subsidiaries.

(3)                         Tax fees include professional services rendered for tax compliance (preparation and review of tax returns), tax advice and tax planning.

Policy on Audit Committee Pre-Approval of Audit and Permissible Non-Audit Services of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The Audit Committee has adopted policies and procedures regarding the pre-approval of the performance by Moss Adams, LLP of audit, audit-related and tax services, except as may otherwise be provided by law or regulation. Moss Adams, LLP has also been instructed to obtain advance approval of any other services.  All services listed above and all fees were approved in advance by the Audit Committee.

Audit Committee Report

The following report of the Audit Committee does not constitute soliciting material and shall not be deemed filed or incorporated by reference into any other filing by us under the Securities Act or the Securities Exchange Act, except to the extent we specifically incorporate this report by reference.

The primary purpose of the Audit Committeein, nor is to assist the Board in fulfilling its responsibility to oversee (i) the integrity of our financial statements, (ii) the independent registered public accounting firm’s qualifications, independence and performance, (iii) our accounting and financial reporting processes, (iv) our compliance with financial legal and regulatory requirements, and (v) the audits of our financial statements. The Audit Committee is directly responsible for the appointment, compensation and oversight of the work of the independent registered public accounting firm. The independent registered public accounting firm reports directly to the Audit Committee.

Management has the primary responsibility for the preparation of the financial statements and the reporting process. Our management has represented to the Audit Committee that the consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015 were prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. In addition to its review of the consolidated financial statements and in the performance of its oversight function, the Audit Committee reviewed and discussed with management the critical accounting policies that were applied in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements, and the process for certifications by our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer. Our independent registered public accounting firm is responsible for auditing the consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015.  The Audit Committee discussed the results of the work of the independent registered public accounting firm.  The Audit Committee discussed with the independent registered public accounting firm the matters requiredit considered to be discussed by Auditing Standard No.16 (Communications with Audit Committees).  In addition, the Audit Committee received from the independent registered public accounting firm the written disclosures required by applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding the independent accountant’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence, and discussed with them their independence from the Company and its management. The Audit Committee also evaluated whether the independent registered public accounting firm’s provision of non-audit services to us was compatible with the auditor’s independence and determined it was compatible.

The Board determined that the Audit Committee members meet the independence requirements of Rule 10A-3 of the Exchange Act and applicable NASDAQ independence rules.

In reliance on the reviews and discussions referred to above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board, and the Board approved, the inclusion of the audited consolidated financial statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015 for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Peter C. Brown (Chairman)

Stephen C. Cook

Thomas E. Tucker

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

We believe that effective corporate governance is an important element of our long-term success and ability to create value for our stockholders. Our Board periodically reviews our existing corporate governance policies and practices, as well as related provisions of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, current and proposed rules of the SEC, and the corporate governance requirements of NASDAQ. Based on its review, the Board has approved charters, policies, procedures and controls that we believe promote and enhance our corporate governance, accountability and responsibility and promote a culture of honesty and integrity.

Charters for each of our Board committees are available on the Investor Relations section of our website at www.prim.com, and copies are available free of charge upon request to our Secretary at Primoris Services Corporation, 2100 McKinney Avenue, Suite 1500, Dallas, Texas 75201.

Board Independence

The listing standards of NASDAQ require that companies have a board of directors with at least a majority of independent directors. Determining director independence requires that the Board affirmatively determine that the director has no material relationship with us, either directly or as a partner, stockholder or officer of an organization that has a relationship with us which, in the opinion of the Board, would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director.

To assist it in making independence determinations, the Board has adopted independence standards, which include the standards required by NASDAQ for independent directors. Under these standards, a director is not independent if:

·                  The director is, or has been within the last three years, one of our or our subsidiaries’ employees, or the director has an immediate family member who is, or has been within the last three years, one of our executive officers;

·                  The director has received, or has an immediate family member who has received, during any twelve-month period within the last three years, more than $120,000 in compensation from us (other than compensation for Board or Committee service, compensation to a family member who is an employee but not an executive officer, or benefits under a tax-qualified retirement plan or non-discretionary compensation);

·                  The director is, or has a family member that is, a partner in, or a controlling stockholder or an executive officer of, any organization to which we made, or from which we received, payments for property or services in the current year or in any of the last three years, that exceed 5% of the recipient’s consolidated gross revenues for that year or $200,000, whichever is greater, other than payments arising solely from investments in our securities or payments under non-discretionary charitable contribution matching programs;

·                  The director, or an immediate family member, is currently employed, or has been employed within the last three years, as an executive officer of another company where any of our present executive officers serves or has served on that company’s compensation committee; or

·                  The director is, or has a family member, that is a current partner of our outside auditor, or was a partner or employee of our outside auditor who worked on our audit at any time during any of the past three years.

On the basis of the Board independence standards identified above, and such other factors as the Board may consider from time to time, the Board has affirmatively determined that Messrs. Brown, Cook, Tinstman and Tucker are independent.

Board Structure and Committee Composition

The Board has: (i) an Audit Committee, (ii) a Compensation Committee, (iii) a Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and (iv) a Succession Planning Committee. The Board and its Committees meet throughout the year on a set schedule and also hold special meetings, both telephonically and in person, and act by written consent from time to time, as appropriate. During 2015, the Board held a total of seven meetings, the Audit Committee held five meetings, the Compensation Committee held four meetings, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee held three meetings and the Succession Planning Committee held four meetings. The independent Directors meet in executive session at meetings of the Board and Committees as necessary. During the Board meetings, all of the independent Directors met in executive session without any management members five times during 2015.

Mr. Pratt, our Chairman of the Board, served as Chief Executive Officer through July 31, 2015.  In May 2015, Mr. David L. King became a member of the Board and effective August 1, 2015 was appointed as Chief Executive Officer.  In May 2010, Mr. Cook was appointed by the Board as the Lead Director, responsible for chairing the Board meetings in the absence of the Chairman, chairing executive sessions of independent Directors, acting as the principal liaison between the Chairman and the independent Directors and serving as the contact Director for stockholders.

The Board and the Compensation Committee do not make decisions regarding an executive officer’s compensation in the presence of such executive officer. The compensation of our Chief Executive Officer and all other executive officers is recommended to the Board of Directors for approval by the Compensation Committee.  The Board of Directors act on the recommendations in a vote in which only independent Directors participate and which takes place during executive sessions of independent Board members.

Director nominees are selected or recommended for the Board of Directors’ selection by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee.  The Board of Directors act on the recommendation in a vote in which only independent Directors participate and which takes place during executive sessions of independent Board members.

Each Director attended all of the Board meetings held in 2015. In addition, each Director attended all of the meetings held by all Board committees on which such person served (during the periods that such person served).

The Audit, Compensation and Nominating and Corporate Governance committees operate under written charters adopted by the Board. The Board committee charters are available on the investor relations section of our website at www.prim.com.

The members of the Board committees are identified in the following table:

Director (1)

Audit
Committee

Compensation
Committee

Nominating and
Corporate
Governance
Committee

Succession
Planning
Committee

Brian Pratt

X

Stephen C. Cook

X

Chair

X

X

Thomas E. Tucker

X

Chair

Peter C. Brown

Chair

X

Robert A. Tinstman

X

X

Chair


(1)         Messrs. Brown, Cook, Tinstman and Tucker are independent Directors.

Audit Committee

The Audit Committee consists of three persons, all of whom are independent under the NASDAQ listing standards. Members of the Audit Committee must also satisfy additional SEC independence requirements, which provide that they may not accept directly or indirectly any consulting, advisory or other compensatory fee from the Company other than compensation in their capacity as Director, or otherwise be an “affiliated person” of us. The Board has determined that Audit Committee members Messrs. Brown, Cook and Tucker all satisfy the applicable SEC independence requirements. The Board has also determined that each member of our Audit Committee qualifies as independent under Rule 10A-3 of the Exchange Act.

The Audit Committee oversees our accounting and financial reporting processes, internal control systems, independent auditor relationships and the audits of our financial statements. Among other matters, the Audit Committee’s responsibilities include the following:

·                  Selecting and hiring our independent registered public accounting firm;

·                  Evaluating the qualifications, independence and performance of our independent registered public accounting firm;

·                  Reviewing and approving the audit and non-audit services to be performed by our independent registered public accounting firm;

·                  Reviewing with management and our independent registered public accounting firm the results of our annual and quarterly financial statements;

·                  Overseeing the administration of management’s process for the design, review of adequacy, implementation and effectiveness of our internal controls established for finance, accounting, legal compliance and ethics;

·                  Reviewing management’s assessment of internal control and steps taken to monitor and control our exposure to financial risk;

·                  Overseeing the administration of management’s process of reviewing the design, adequacy, implementation and effectiveness of our critical accounting and financial policies;

·                  Overseeing and monitoring the integrity of our financial statements and our compliance with legal and regulatory requirements as they relate to our financial statements of accounting matters; and

·                  Reviewing and approving any related party transactions.

Audit Committee Financial Expert.                     The Board has also determined that Mr. Brown is the Audit Committee “financial expert” as defined under SEC rules and regulations. Management has the primary responsibility for the preparation of the financial statements and the financial reporting processes of the Company. On a quarterly basis, the independent Audit Committee members meet with the auditors without the presence of management. During these independent sessions, the Committee and the auditors discuss, among other things, the acceptability of the Company’s accounting principles, critical accounting policies and sensitive accounting estimates.

Compensation Committee

The members of the Compensation Committee of the Board are Messrs. Cook (Chairman), Brown and Tinstman. All of the members of the Compensation Committee meet the independence requirements of NASDAQ listing standards.

The Compensation Committee monitors and assists the Board in determining compensation for our executive officers and Directors. The Board and the Compensation Committee do not make decisions regarding an executive officer’s compensation in the presence of such executive officer. After the Compensation Committee analyzes compensation issues related to our Chief Executive Officer and other executive officers, it makes a recommendation to the Board’s independent Directors for determination by independent Directors in a vote in which only independent Directors participate. The Compensation Committee has the following authority and responsibilities, among others, with respect to our Director and executive compensation plans:

·                  Reviewing the goals and objectives of our executive compensation programs and recommending to the Board any changes to these goals and objectives;

·                  Reviewing our executive compensation plans including incentive, equity-based and benefit plans, and recommending to the Board the adoption of new plans or amendments to existing plans;

·                  Evaluating annually the performance of the Chief Executive Officer and recommending to the independent members of the Board his or her compensation level based on this evaluation;

·                  Evaluating annually the performance of the other executive officers of the Company and its subsidiaries and recommending to the independent members of the Board the compensation level of each based on this evaluation;

·                  Reviewing and recommending to the independent members of the Board, concurrently with the Board’s Audit Committee, any employment, severance or termination arrangements made with any executive officer of the Company or its subsidiaries; and

·                  Evaluating the appropriate level and types of compensation for Board and Committee service by non-employee Directors and recommending any changes to the Board.

The Compensation Committee has the power to form subcommittees for any purpose that it deems appropriate and may delegate to such subcommittee such power and authority as the Compensation Committee may deem appropriate, provided it does not delegate to a subcommittee any power or authority required by any law, regulation or listing standard to be exercised by the Compensation Committee as a whole. The Compensation Committee may consider the recommendations of our Chief Executive Officer in determining the level of compensation of the executive officers of the Company and its subsidiaries. The Compensation Committee has the authority to retain such independent consultants or advisers as it deems necessary and appropriate, including compensation consultants, to advise it with respect to amounts or forms of executive or Director compensation, and may rely on the

integrity and advice of any such advisers. The Compensation Committee also has the sole authority to retain a compensation consultant to assist it in carrying out its responsibilities, including the sole authority to approve the consultant’s fees and other retention terms, such fees to be borne by us, and to terminate any such consultant.

The Committee engaged Pay Governance, LLC as its independent advisor in 2012.  Prior to their engagement, Pay Governance did not perform any services for the Company. The Committee considered independence factors under Dodd-Frank and NASDAQ rules and concluded that the work performed by Pay Governance did not present any conflicts of interest.  Pay Governance advises and consults with the Committee on compensation issues, compensation design and trends, and keeps the Committee apprised of regulatory, legislative, and accounting developments and competitive practices related to executive compensation. Pay Governance reviews, at the direction of the Committee, compensation levels, trends and practices at the discretion of the Committee. Pay Governance does not determine the exact amount or form of executive compensation for any executive officers. See “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Our Compensation Program.” Pay Governance reports directly to the Committee, and a representative of Pay Governance, when requested, attends meetings of the Committee, is available to participate in executive sessions and communicates directly with the Committee Chair or its members outside of meetings. Pay Governance does no other work for the Company.”

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

No interlocking relationship exists between any member of our Board and any member of the Board of Directors or compensation committee of any other companies, nor has such interlocking relationships existed in the past.

Stockholder Advisory “Say on Pay” Vote

In our 2011 proxy, we indicated that we believed that seeking stockholder approval advisory votes every third year would provide the most efficient form of communication and would lend itself to the long-term nature of the compensation plans for our management. At the 2011 annual meeting, of those votes that expressed a position on the frequency of pay, 76.25% recommended an advisory vote every three years. After deliberation, the Compensation Committee and the Board adopted the position of asking for an advisory vote every three years. Three years later, at the 2014 Annual Meeting, the stockholders made a non-binding advisory vote with 93.6% approving the Company’s executive compensation program. Voting at the 2017 Annual Meeting will include a non-binding advisory vote as to the frequency of the vote and a nonbinding advisory vote approving the executive compensation program.

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee

The members of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee are Messrs. Tucker (Chairman), Cook, and Tinstman.  All of the members of the Committee meet the independence requirements of NASDAQ listing standards.

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee assists the Board by identifying individuals qualified to become Directors consistent with criteria established by the Board.  After the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee identifies qualified individuals, it makes a recommendation to the Board’s independent Directors. Director nominees are selected by a majority of the Board’s independent Directors in a vote in which only independent Directors participate. Among other matters, the Committee’s responsibilities include the following:

·                  Evaluating the composition, size and governance of the Board and its committees and making recommendations regarding future planning and the appointment of Directors to committees of our Board;

·                  Administering a policy for evaluating and considering nominees for election to the Board;

·                  Overseeing the evaluation of our Board as a whole;

·                  Reviewing our corporate governance principles and providing recommendations to the Board regarding possible changes; and

·                  Developing and reviewing our Code of Ethics and assuring that it is appropriate for us.

Selection of Board Nominees

In identifying Board nominees, we may consider individuals who are known to our officers or Directors, or individuals with significant industry or other relevant experience. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee’s consideration of a candidate as a Director includes assessment of the individual’s understanding of our business, the individual’s professional and

educational background, skills, expertise, potential time commitment, and other criteria established by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee from time to time.

To provide such a contribution to us, a Director must generally possess one or more of the following, in addition to personal and professional integrity:

·                  Experience in corporate management;

·                  Experience in our industry;

·                  Experience as a board member or officer of a publicly held company;

·                  Experience in financial and accounting matters;

·                  Diversity of expertise and experience in substantive matters related to our business; and

·                  Practical and mature business judgment.

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee has adopted its own procedures for evaluating the suitability of potential Director nominees, including qualifications for a “financial expert” and financially literate members for the Audit Committee.

Succession Planning Committee

In May 2011, the Board of Directors established a Succession Planning Committee and appointed Mr. Tinstman as Committee Chair with Mr. Pratt, our Chairman, and Mr. Cook, our independent Lead Director, as members. The purpose of the Committee is to coordinate the efforts of the Board and executive management in establishing the processes, procedures and practices that the Board and management will use to meet their succession planning responsibilities, including succession with respect to the position of CEO. In addition, the Committee has established contingency plans for the departure, death or disability of our CEO.

Board Role in Risk Oversight

Our Board is responsible for oversight of our Company’s risks. As with all companies, and especially with construction companies, we face a variety of risks in our business. Many of these risks are discussed in Item 1A, “Risk Factors” in our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K, which was filed with the SEC on February 29, 2016.

The Board believes that having a system in place for risk management and implementing strategies responsive to our risk profile and exposures is the best way to identify in a timely manner specific material risks, but we can give no assurances that we will be able to identify or mitigate all possible risks in advance. In order to more efficiently provide oversight of these material risks, the Board has designated certain risk oversight responsibilities to relevant Board committees. The Audit Committee has the direct responsibility for risk oversight relating to accounting matters, financial reporting, enterprise, legal and compliance risks. To assist in this risk oversight function, the Audit Committee obtains assistance from the following: (1) our Chief Financial Officer, who is responsible for managing our risk management function, (2) our General Counsel, who is responsible for the Company’s third party insurance programs and (3) our independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committee meets periodically with management and the independent auditors to review financial exposures. The Compensation Committee is responsible for risks related to employment policies and our compensation and benefits systems. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee oversees risks associated with our Code of Conduct, including compliance with listing standards for independent Directors and committee assignments. As necessary, the committee chairmen report any risk-related matters to the full Board at Board of Directors meetings.

While the Board is responsible for risk oversight, the day-to-day risk management is the responsibility of the operating management and executive officers. Our executive officers maintain a significant ownership interest which results in an increased level of awareness of the need of risk management and risk oversight for the long-term benefit of the Company.

Code of Ethics

The Company has a Code of Ethics that complies with the rules and regulations adopted by the SEC and NASDAQ listing standards and are applicable to all of our Directors, officers and employees. The Code of Ethics is available on the Investor Relations section of our website at www.prim.com. We intend to post amendments to, or waivers, if any, from our Code of Ethics (to the extent

applicable to our Directors or Chief Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer, or Principal Accounting Officer) at this location on our website. Among other matters, this Code of Ethics is designed to promote:

·                  Honest and ethical conduct;

·                  Avoidance of conflicts of interest;

·                  Full, fair, accurate, timely and understandable disclosure in reports and documents that we file with, or submit to, the SEC and in our other public communications;

·                  Compliance with applicable governmental laws and regulations and stock exchange rules;

·                  Prompt internal reporting of violations of the Code of Ethics to an appropriate person or persons identified in the Code of Ethics; and

·                  Accountability for adherence to the Code of Ethics.

Policy Regarding Director Attendance at Annual Meetings of Stockholders

Directors are strongly encouraged to attend our Annual Meetings of Stockholders, and we currently expect all of our Directors to be in attendance at the Annual Meeting on May 3, 2016. All the Directors were in attendance at the 2015 Annual Meeting.

Stockholder Communications with the Board of Directors

Stockholders may communicate with any of our Directors, either individually or as a group, by writing to them at Primoris Services Corporation, c/o Secretary, 2100 McKinney Avenue, Suite 1500, Dallas, Texas 75201. Please specify to whom your correspondence should be directed. The Secretary will promptly forward all correspondence to the Board or any specific committee member, as indicated in the correspondence, except for mass mailings, job inquiries, surveys, business solicitations or advertisements, or patently offensive or otherwise inappropriate material. Our Secretary may forward certain correspondence, such as product-related or service-related inquiries, elsewhere within the Company for review and possible response.

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Our Board has adopted a written policy requiring review, approval and ratification of any related party transaction. All related party transactions may be consummated and continued only if the Audit Committee has approved or ratified such transaction after a review of the relevant facts and circumstances.

The following is a description of related party transactions to which we have been a party, in which the amount involved exceeded $120,000, other than compensation and employment arrangements described elsewhere in this Proxy Statement. The descriptions are for the annual periods of 2015, 2014 and 2013. We believe the terms obtained or consideration that we paid or received, as applicable, in connection with the transactions below were comparable to terms available or the amounts that would be paid or received, as applicable, in arm’s length transactions with independent third parties.

Primoris has entered into leasing transactions with Stockdale Investment Group, Inc. (“SIGI”).  Brian Pratt, our Chairman of the Board of Directors and our largest stockholder, holds a majority interest in, and is the chairman, president and chief executive officer and a director of SIGI. John M. Perisich, our Executive Vice President and General Counsel, is secretary of SIGI.

Primoris leases properties from SIGI at the following locations:

1.              Bakersfield, California (lease expires October 2022)

2.              Pittsburg, California (lease expires April 2023)

3.              San Dimas, California (lease expires March 2019)

During the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, the Company paid $831,000, $862,000 and $907,000, respectively, in lease payments to SIGI for the use of these properties.

Primoris leases a property from Roger Newnham, a former owner and current manager of our subsidiary, OnQuest Canada, ULC. The property is located in Calgary, Canada. During the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 Primoris paid $254,000, $289,000 and $295,000, respectively, in lease payments.  The current term of the lease is through December 31, 2017.

Primoris leases a property from Lemmie Rockford, one of the Rockford sellers, which commenced November 1, 2011.  The property is located in Toledo, Washington.  During the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, Primoris paid $90,000, $90,000 and $90,000, respectively, in lease payments.  The lease will expire in January 2017.

Primoris leases a property from Quality RE Partners, owned by three of the Q3 Contracting, Inc. (“Q3C”) selling shareholders, of whom two are current employees, including Jay Osborn, an operations president in the West Construction segment. The property is located in Little Canada, Minnesota.  During the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, the Company paid $270,000, $264,000 and $264,000, respectively, in lease payments to Quality RE Partners.  The lease expires in October 2022.  In addition, in November 2015, Q3C purchased construction equipment at fair value from Quality RE Partners for $589,000.  Q3C also leased construction equipment from Mr. Osborn during 2015 for $36,000 and subsequently purchased the equipment at fair value for $145,000.

We believe that the amounts that we pay for the leases approximate terms that we could obtain from independent third parties.  In addition, any new leases, extensions of lease terms and changes in lease terms or amounts must be approved in advance by the independent directors of the Board of Directors Audit Committee.

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

Directors who also are employees of the Company do not receive additional compensation for serving as Directors. Compensation for employee Directors is determined by the Board’s Compensation Committee and is discussed further in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of this proxy.

Current compensation for independent Directors of the Company, effective July 1, 2014, includes the following components:

·                  Cash payments of $35,000 made for the second and fourth calendar quarters of each year.

·                  In lieu of cash payments for the first and third calendar quarters of each year, the Directors are issued Common Stock with an approximate aggregate value of $46,667 each. The Common Stock cannot be traded for a period of one year from the date of issuance. The number of shares is determined using the average of the closing prices of the Company’s Common Stock on NASDAQ for the one-month period prior to the beginning of the quarter. The shares are issued pursuant to the Primoris 2013 Equity Incentive Plan, approved by the stockholders on May 3, 2013 (“2013 Equity Plan”).

·                  Additional annual cash compensation as follows:

·                  $25,000 to the Chairman of the Board;

·                  $20,000 to the Chairman of the Audit Committee

·                  $15,000 to the Chairman of the Compensation Committee; and

·                  $15,000 to the non-employee chairman of any other committees established by the Board of Directors.

In addition, Directors are reimbursed for expenses incurred in connection with Board and Board Committee meetings and assignments.

Effective July 31, 2015, Brian Pratt relinquished his role of Chief Executive Officer and President.  Mr. Pratt remained as Chairman of the Board and assumed the non-employee position of Senior Strategic Advisor.  On August 5, 2015, the Board of Directors approved a four year agreement for Brian Pratt’s services as Senior Strategic Advisor.  The agreement provides for an annual fee of $325,000, medical insurance benefits equal to those provided to Company employees, Company-provided automobile insurance coverage similar to that provided prior to the change in his status, up to 100 hours of personal use of any Company owned or leased aircraft per year, and reimbursement of personal use of Company-paid club memberships in Dallas County, Texas and Orange County, California.

The table below details the compensation earned by our non-employee Directors in 2015.

Non-Employee Director

 

Fees
Earned or
Paid in
Cash

 

Stock Awards (1)

 

All Other
Compensation
(3)

 

Total

 

Peter C. Brown

 

$

90,000

 

$

93,334

 

$

 

$

183,334

 

Stephen C. Cook

 

$

85,000

 

$

93,334

 

$

 

$

178,334

 

Robert A. Tinstman

 

$

85,000

 

$

93,334

 

$

 

$

178,334

 

Thomas E. Tucker

 

$

85,000

 

$

93,334

 

$

 

$

178,334

 

Brian Pratt (2)

 

$

209,498

 

$

 

$

20,935

 

$

230,433

 


(1)         The non-employee Directors were each issued 2,042 shares of Common Stock in March 2015 and 2,437 shares in August 2015. The shares were issued under the 2013 Equity Plan and are subject to a one-year contractual holding requirement. The aggregate market value of the shares on the date received was $87,257 for 2015. The Company has never issued stock options as Director compensation and there were no outstanding equity awards as of March 31, 2016.

(2)         Effective July 31, 2015, Mr. Pratt relinquished his role of Chief Executive Officer and President.  He was paid Director fees, Chairman of the Board fees and Strategic Advisor Fees on a pro rata basis for the period August 1, 2015 through December 31, 2015.  In lieu of issuing stock to Mr. Pratt for the third quarter 2015, the Company paid the equivalent pro rata amount in cash.  Note that Mr. Pratt’s compensation prior to August 1, 2015 is discussed in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of this proxy.

(3)         All Other Compensation amounts reflected the value of personal use of Company aircraft.  The Company determined the value of personal aircraft use using the aggregate incremental cost to the Company, based on the cost of fuel, trip-related maintenance, crew travel expenses, landing fees, trip related costs and smaller variable costs.  For tax purposes, income is imputed to the Director for non-business travel based on a multiple of the Standard Industry Fare Level (SIFL) rates.

STOCK OWNERSHIP

Security Ownership of 5% or Greater Stockholders, Directors, Director Nominees and Executive Officers

The following table sets forth information with respect to beneficial ownership of Common Stock for (a) those persons known by management of the Company to beneficially own 5% or more of our Common Stock (other than executives and Directors), (b) each Director and Director nominee, (c) the Named Executive Officers listed in the Summary Compensation Table under “Executive Compensation” (which includes (i) our current Chief Executive Officer, (ii) our current Chief Financial Officer, (iii) our two other executive officers and (iv) our two most highly compensated employees who are not executive officers), and (d) all of our executive officers and Directors as a group. The information for the officers and Directors is provided as of March 31, 2016 and the information for 5% or more stockholders is as of the most recent filing with the SEC. The Company is not aware of any arrangement or pledge of Common Stock that could result in a change of control of the Company.

Beneficial ownership is determined under the rules of the SEC and generally includes voting or investment power with respect to securities. To our knowledge, the persons named in the table have “sole voting and investment power” and “shared voting and investment power”, with respect to all shares of Common Stock beneficially owned, subject to community property laws where applicable.

Name

 

Amount and
Nature of
Beneficial
Ownership (1)

 

Percentage of
Common Stock
Outstanding(2)

 

5% or Greater Stockholders (other than executives and Directors):

 

 

 

 

 

Barrow, Hanley, Mewhinney & Strauss, LLC (3)

 

3,332,154

 

6.4

%

The Vanguard Group (4)

 

2,701,779

 

5.2

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

Named Executive Officers and Directors:

 

 

 

 

 

Brian Pratt (5)

 

10,243,908

 

19.8

%

Scott Summers

 

770,006

 

1.5

%

David L. King (6)

 

49,679

 

*

 

Timothy R. Healy

 

265,574

 

*

 

John M. Perisich (7)

 

139,475

 

*

 

Peter J. Moerbeek (8)

 

117,821

 

*

 

Thomas E. Tucker (9)

 

22,376

 

*

 

Peter C. Brown

 

22,205

 

*

 

Robert A. Tinstman

 

22,205

 

*

 

Stephen C. Cook

 

18,405

 

*

 

All Directors, nominees and executive officers as a group (12 individuals)

 

11,989,811

 

23.1

%


*                                    Indicates beneficial ownership of less than one percent of total outstanding Common Stock.

(1)         This table lists voting securities, including shares held of record, shares held by a bank, broker or nominee for the person’s interest and shares held through family trust arrangements.

(2)         For each individual and group included in the table, percentage ownership is calculated by dividing the number of shares beneficially owned by such person or group plus the number of shares of Common Stock that such person or group has the right to acquire on or within 60 days after March 31, 2016 divided by the sum of the 51,772,497 shares of Common Stock outstanding on March 31, 2016, plus the number of shares of Common Stock that such person or group has the right to acquire on or within 60 days after March 31, 2016.

(3)         Based on information set forth in the Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 2, 2016.  The principal business address of Barrow, Hanley, Mewhinney & Strauss, LLC is 2200 Ross Avenue, 31st Floor, Dallas, TX 75201.

(4)         Based on information set forth in the Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 10, 2016.  The principal business address of The Vanguard Group is 100 Vanguard Blvd, Malvern, PA 19355.

(5)         Includes 10,146,098 shares of Common Stock held directly by Brian Pratt and indirectly by Barbara Pratt, as the spouse of Mr. Pratt, and 97,810 shares of Common Stock owned directly by Ms. Pratt and indirectly by Mr. Pratt.

(6)         Includes vested RSU Units as follows:  24,256 vested Units and 190 vested Dividend Equivalent Units (as provided for under the 2013 Equity Plan).

(7)         Represents 139,475 shares of Common Stock owned directly by the Perisich Family Trust dated July 11, 2007 and indirectly by John M. Perisich, as trustee of the trust.

(8)         Includes vested RSU Units as follows:  50,000 vested Units, 25,000 Units that will vest on April 30, 2016 and 701 vested Dividend Equivalent Units (as provided for under the 2013 Equity Plan).

(9)         Includes 15,205 shares of Common Stock held directly by Thomas E. Tucker, 6,868 shares of Common Stock held by the Tucker Family Trust U/A dated 12/21/1998, a revocable trust, of which Thomas E. Tucker is a trustee and beneficiary and 303 shares of Common Stock held by SaraJen Capital, LLC, a California limited liability company, of which Mr. Tucker is a one-third member and sole manager with full dispositive power over such shares.

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our officers, Directors and persons who beneficially own more than ten percent (10%) of a registered class of our equity securities to file reports of securities ownership and changes in ownership with the SEC.

As of the datepart of, this Proxy Statement, and based solely on our review of the copies of such reports furnished to us and written representations from our executive officers and Directors, we believe that all reports needed to be filed by current Section 16 reporting persons were timely filed for the year ended December 31, 2016 and through April 4, 2016, with the exception of four Form 4 reports filed on December 11, 2015 for restricted stock issued to the independent Directors on August 3, 2015 as part of their third quarter 2015 Director compensation program.  Each of the four Directors, Messrs Brown, Cook, Tinstman and Tucker, were issued 2,090 shares of common stock.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

This section discusses the oversight of our executive compensation program by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors and provides a discussion of the compensation earned in 2015 by our executive officers.  At December 31, 2015, the following were designated by the Board of Directors as the executive officers of the Company:

·                  David L. King, 63, President and Chief Executive Officer (CEO) since August 1, 2015, and prior to that Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer;

·                  Peter J. Moerbeek, 68, Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer (CFO); and

·                  John M. Perisich, 51, Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary.

In addition, the discussion will encompass compensation earned by our Chairman for his service as CEO for part of 2015 and the compensation earned by our two most highly compensated employees who are not executive officers, as follows:

·                  Brian Pratt, current Chairman and former CEO and President through July 31, 2015;

·                  Timothy R. Healy, 56, Co-President, ARB, Inc. (Industrial); and

·                  Scott Summers, 57, Co-President, ARB, Inc. (Underground).

These six persons are referred to as Named Executive Officers (“NEOs”) in the following discussion.

Overview

Our management compensation programs apply broadly to all officers and management persons at the Company with modifications to reflect the different management levels and types of responsibilities. The Company’s goal is to align compensation so that all management is committed to the Company’s corporate objectives of achieving both near- and long-term profitable growth.

In overseeing the executive compensation policies and practices for the Company, the Compensation Committee recognizes several unique cultural elements associated with the transition in July 2008 from a successful privately owned company to a successful publicly traded company. Our present Chairman and former CEO became majority owner of the private company in 1983 and has served as CEO through July 31, 2015.  Just prior to the time that we became a publicly traded company, ownership was held by 42 employees, directors and associates, all of whom had purchased their ownership interest.  Additionally, a significant part of our acquisitions of James Construction Group in 2009 and Rockford in 2010 involved issuing Company stock which added to the number of executives and managers who own Company stock as a material part of their personal wealth.  Many of these former owners have remained executives and managers, and a significant portion of their personal wealth results from their ownership of our stock. This ownership helps align the interests of many of the Company’s executives and managers with those of our stockholders.

To help maintain the ownership culture, the Compensation Committee has approved the following during the past few years:

·                  For significant acquisitions, the issuance of shares as part of the purchase price, especially to owners who will continue as Company employees;

·                  Grant of 48,512 Restricted Stock Units (“Units”) vesting over a three-year period to our current CEO at the time of his hire in 2014 and a grant of 100,000 Units vesting over a four-year period to our CFO in 2013; and

·                  Offering discounted shares to executives and managers as part of our Long-term Retention Plan (“LTR Plan”).

Prior to becoming a public company, it was our practice to provide annual discretionary bonus awards based both on overall financial and non-financial performance. These discretionary awards were not tied to attaining a specific financial result; that is, there was no mathematical formula for determining bonus amounts. The Compensation Committee has retained this practice.  The Committee believes that based on the history and culture of the Company, the discretionary approach has served to recognize performance for the executive management team.  The Committee also notes that the largest annual discretionary bonus amount awarded since 2008 has been $500,000.

The Compensation Committee recognizes that as the Company grows, as some executives roles change and as new executives are recruited, we may need to consider changes that could align our practices more closely with those of other publicly traded companies. These practices may include establishment of more formulaic annual incentive calculations, a more formulaic total bonus amount and an increased emphasis on equity awards.  In addition, opportunity for equity awards may be required to attract executives.  As discussed later in this Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the Committee adopted a formula to calculate a portion of the CEO’s annual incentive bonus when David L. King was promoted to CEO in August 2015.

Based on our overall financial performance since becoming a public company and the fact that there has been minimal turn-over at the senior and executive management levels of the Company, we believe that our current compensation practices and ownership culture have served our stockholders well.

Shareholder “Say-on-Pay” Vote

At our Annual Meeting of Stockholders in May 2014, 93.6% of votes cast on our advisory vote on executive compensation (say-on-pay proposal) were voted in favor of the proposal.

2015 Performance Highlights

To put the compensation decisions in context, the following summarizes the Company’s results for 2015:

·                  Revenues decreased by 7.5% to $1.9 billion from 2014; and, earnings per share decreased by 41.8% to $0.71 per share compared to $1.22 per share in 2014, reflecting the challenging weather and market factors of 2015.

·                  Total stockholder return for the five-year period ending December 31, 2015 was in excess of 185%; however, for the year 2015, total shareholder return decreased by 4.2%.  During 2015, our share price decreased from $22.99 per share at December 31, 2014 to $22.03 per share at December 31, 2015.  This 4.1% price decline compared to a decline of 12.3% for the same period for the ten companies identified in the “Role of Benchmarking” section below.

·                  In 2015, cash flow from operations was $48.4 million, an increase of $12.3 million, compared to 2014 cash flow from operations of $36.1 million.  At December 31, 2015, year-end cash and cash equivalents was $161.1 million, an increase of $21.6 million, compared to December 31, 2014 year-end cash and cash equivalents of $139.5 million.

·                  Tangible net worth increased by $27.8 million to $322.6 million.

The Committee noted that of the $0.51 decline in earnings per share, 82% occurred during the first half of 2015, especially in the second quarter, reflecting the impact of adverse weather conditions.

Compensation Philosophy

Our goal is to create an executive compensation program that will adequately reward our executives for their roles in creating both near-term and long-term value for our stockholders without encouraging or rewarding excessive risk. The Compensation Committee is charged with reviewing our executive officers’ cash compensation and equity holdings to determine whether these provide adequate incentives and motivation to our executive officers and whether they adequately compensate the executive officers relative to comparable officers in other companies within our industry.  Our goal is to be competitive with other similarly situated companies in our industry and to attract, retain and motivate key executives.

Processes and Procedures for Determining Executive Compensation

The following describes the roles of the key participants and sources of information in the process of setting compensation.

The Role of the Compensation Committee

The Compensation Committee reviews and approves compensation and benefit policies and objectives, determines whether our officers, directors and employees are compensated in general according to these objectives, and carries out certain of the Board’s responsibilities relating to the compensation of our executives. The Compensation Committee operates under a charter approved by the Board. All of the Compensation Committee members meet the NASDAQ independence standards, are “Non-employee” Directors as defined by the Exchange Act and are “outside Directors” as defined by Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code.

For our executive’s compensation, the Compensation Committee approves the structure of the compensation program.  In addition, the Committee directly sets compensation for the Company’s senior officers, including all NEOs. The Compensation Committee is involved in all matters where approval is appropriate for tax or regulatory reasons.

The Role of the Board of Directors

The Board provides final approval of Compensation Committee recommendations for compensation changes for the executive officers. This approval is obtained at an independent Director session without the presence of management Directors.

The Role of Executives

Our CEO is responsible for reviewing the compensation and performance of all the executive officers. He makes recommendations to the Compensation Committee for adjustments in compensation, for annual short-term bonus amounts and for any other compensation changes including any equity awards. The Compensation Committee uses the CEO’s recommendations and its evaluation of current individual and business performance and historical individual and business performance to review and approve annual bonus amounts. Our CEO is not present during and does not participate in the discussion of any elements of his compensation with the Compensation Committee.

Our CFO facilitates the flow of information among the Company, the compensation consultant and the Compensation Committee. In this role, he communicates with the compensation consultant at the direction of the Compensation Committee.

The Role of External Advisors

The Compensation Committee has engaged Pay Governance, LLC as an independent consulting resource to help it with its responsibilities.Statement.

Other Information and advice provided by Pay Governance includes a review and critique of our executive compensation philosophy and strategies; and when requested, a competitive analysis of competition program design; and a presentation updating market trends. Pay Governance attends Compensation Committee meetings as requested by the Compensation Committee and conducts private meetings with the Compensation Committee without management representatives at the Committee’s request.

The Role of Benchmarking

We believe that it is helpful when making compensation-related decisions to be aware of current practices at similarly situated publicly held companies in engineering, construction and related industries. The Compensation Committee periodically considers the compensation levels at other companies in our industry. We do not view benchmarking as a stand-alone tool for setting compensation due to the aspects of our business and objectives that may be unique to us.  In using its collective judgment in setting executive pay, the Compensation Committee may use benchmarking as one consideration; however, at this time the Compensation Committee’s decisions are based primarily on recommendations from our CEO, the Compensation Committee’s evaluation of the executive’s performance, the overall Company performance and our overall compensation strategy.  We reviewed the most recent proxy information available for the following 10 publicly traded engineering and construction companies (primarily 2014 information):  Chicago Bridge & Iron Company, EMCOR Group, Inc., Fluor Corporation, Granite Construction, Inc., KBR, MasTec, Inc., Matrix Service Company, Quanta Services, Inc., Sterling Construction Company, Inc. and Willbros Group, Inc.  We found that our CEO’s total 2015 compensation, using the “Total” amount from the Summary Compensation Table, was in the lower half of the peer companies’ CEOs on an absolute basis and in the lower half when total compensation was normalized for annual revenue.

Components of Executive Officer Compensation

The primary elements of our executive officer compensation program consist of base salary, an annual short-term bonus, and participation in the Company’s LTR Plan which can assist in accumulation of equity.

·                  Base salary provides a fixed level of cash compensation that recognizes the value of an individual’s role in the Company.  Salary is influenced by the executive’s specific role and responsibilities, the executive’s skill and performance and the executive’s experience, as well as the executive’s future potential and internal pay equity. The executive’s compensation has two primary components: salary and the annual long-term retention plan which includes both cash and equity. We view the two components of executive compensation as related, but each is a distinct part of overall compensation. Although our Compensation Committee reviews total compensation, we do not believe that significant compensation derived from one component of compensation should negate or reduce compensation from other components. We anticipate determining the appropriate level for each compensation component based in part, but not exclusively, on our view of internal equity and consistency, individual performance and other information deemed relevant and timely.

·                  Annual short-term bonuses provide a cash incentive bonus to focus executives on achieving key operational and financial objectives within a yearly time horizon and to provide a reward for annual performance.  In general, we do not have a specific award opportunity target amount.  All of our executive officers are participants in the LTR Plan and annual bonus amounts are paid out under the terms of that Plan.

The LTR Plan combines elements of an annual bonus and a longer-term equity opportunity with the intent to provide an incentive for continuing employment. Under terms of the LTR Plan, annual bonus amounts are paid over a two-year period with one-half of the amount payable immediately and one-half deferred for one year. The deferred amount is a general obligation of the Company, but provides no interest or other income to the participants. Except in the case of death, disability or involuntary separation from service, the deferred compensation is generally vested to the participant only if employed by the Company on the payment date of bonus amounts the following year. The amount of compensation deferred under this plan is calculated each year based on the current year bonus amount.  Participation in the LTR Plan is based on the recommendation of a senior manager and approval of the CEO and is elective to each participant. Participants have the ability to voluntarily resign from the plan prior to the end of each calendar year.

·                  Equity awards provide an opportunity to align the interests of executives with stockholders by linking a portion of the executive’s compensation opportunity to share price performance. Equity awards also help provide long-term accountability for executives by offering opportunity for capital accumulation for executives.

For 2015, the LTR Plan allows each participant the opportunity to designate an amount of their annual bonus to purchase Company Common Stock at a 25% discount to the average market price of the Company’s shares for the month of December 2015, which was $22.33 per share, resulting in LTR Plan shares available for purchase at $16.84 per share.  Each participant can designate up to 1/6 (16.67%) of their annual bonus; the designation must have been made prior to the end of December 2015.  Discounted shares purchased cannot be sold for six months after issuance. Shares are issued under the provisions of our 2013 Long-term Incentive Equity Plan (“2013 Equity Plan”) which was approved by our stockholders and adopted by the Company on May 3, 2013.

In addition to the LTR Plan, the Compensation Committee considers and approves any recommendations made by the CEO for special equity awards for retention, hiring or other purposes.  To date, the Committee has approved the following issuance of equity grants under the 2013 Equity Plan:

·                  On May 3, 2013, the Company entered into a Restricted Stock Unit Agreement (“RSU Agreement”) with a grant of 100,000 Restricted Stock Units (“Units”) made to our CFO for retention purposes.  On the grant date, the market value was $21.98 per Unit. Commencing annually on May 10, 2014 and ending April 30, 2017, the Units will vest in four equal installments.  As of March 31, 2016, a total of 50,000 Units had vested, with these vested Units accruing “Dividend Equivalent Units” (as defined in the 2013 Equity Plan).  At March 31, 2016, a total of 701 Dividend Equivalent Units were accrued and vested.  In the event of termination not for cause, disability, death or on a change of control, as these terms are defined in the RSU Agreement, vesting will be accelerated.

·                  On March 24, 2014, the Company entered into an RSU Agreement with a grant of 48,512 Units made to our COO (now our CEO) as part of the hiring process.  The Units had a market value of $30.92 per Unit on the grant date.  The Units vested 50% on September 23, 2015 and 50% on March 23, 2017.  At March 31, 2016, a total of 190 Dividend Equivalent Units were accrued and vested.  In the event of termination not for cause, disability, death or on a change of control, as these terms are defined in the RSU Agreement, vesting will be accelerated.

·                  Benefit plans provide for opportunities to contribute to retirement savings and promote health and wellness.  We have established and maintain various employee benefit plans, including medical, dental, life insurance and 401(k) plans.  These plans are available to all employees and do not discriminate in favor of executive officers. We may provide some other perquisites to our executives that are not available to our employees generally.

Compensation Committee Pay Decisions

2015 Base Salary Amounts

In accordance with Company practices, base salaries for all employees are reviewed annually in July. For the NEOs, with the exception of the CEO, the Committee reviewed the recommendations from both Mr. Pratt and Mr. King.  Mr. King’s salary increase was negotiated as part of his employment agreement on his selection as CEO effective August 1, 2015.  The following table shows changes approved by the Compensation Committee:

Name 

 

2015 Base Salary ($)

 

2014 Base Salary ($)

 

$ increase

 

David L. King (1)

 

685,000

 

525,000

 

160,000

 

Brian Pratt (2)

 

N/A

 

675,000

 

N/A

 

Peter J. Moerbeek

 

490,000

 

475,000

 

15,000

 

John M. Perisich

 

400,000

 

375,000

 

25,000

 

Timothy R. Healy

 

440,000

 

425,000

 

15,000

 

Scott Summers

 

440,000

 

425,000

 

15,000

 


(1)         Mr. King served as President and CEO from August 1, 2015 through December 31, 2015.  Mr. King was Chief Operating Officer (COO) prior to August 2015.

(2)         Mr. Pratt served as President and CEO from January 1, 2015 through July 31, 2015.

Annual Short-Term Bonus Amounts

The Compensation Committee recognizes that historically there have been no specific targets against which to calculate annual bonus amounts. While the goal of the executive management team is to continue to profitably grow the value of the business over the long term, it has been the Company’s practice not to set specific individual goals for any of the executives at the start of each year. Instead, at the end of the year, the CEO and the Compensation Committee review the overall performance of the Company and the contributions made by the top executives.

In determining its recommendations for 2015 short-term bonus amounts for the six persons under its purview, the Compensation Committee considered the Company’s overall performance as summarized in the 2015 Highlights section above, and for the NEOs, excluding the CEO, the Compensation Committee discussed with the CEO the performance of the executive management team.

Mr. King’s employment agreement, effective at the time that he became CEO on August 1, 2015, established two annual bonus provisions, each with a maximum amount of up to 75% of his annual salary.  The first provision requires the establishment of measurable performance targets while the second provision remains discretionary for the Compensation Committee.

To determine the incentive amount for the measurable targets, the Committee used the pro-rata portion of Mr. King’s annual salary for the period August 1, 2015 through December 31, 2015 multiplied by 75% to establish a maximum bonus potential.  The Committee then approved two criteria as the targets:  one relating to diluted earnings per share for the period and one relating to new business signed (bookings) for the period.  For each target, a minimum amount was established.  If diluted earnings per share or bookings did not attain the minimum amount, no bonus would be paid for that target.  Additionally, a maximum target amount was established for each target.  Performance beyond the maximum amount would not result in an additional bonus beyond the maximum bonus potential.  Performance between the minimum and maximum amounts was calculated for each target on a pro-rata basis.  The measurable targets were adopted by the Committee on September 2, 2015.  Based on the performance of the Company toward attaining the two measurable targets, the Committee determined that Mr. King achieved 5% of the 2015 targets, resulting in a bonus of $14,271.

The Committee reviewed Mr. King’s performance for determining the discretionary part of his bonus for his service as COO (January through July 2015) and CEO (August through December 2015).  During the process, the Committee met with Mr. Pratt to discuss his recommendations for Mr. King.  The Committee considered non-financial measures, such as the significant improvement in the Company’s safety record during 2015 and decided to recommend a discretionary bonus amount of $500,000 for 2015.

The Committee also reviewed the performance of Brian Pratt for his tenure as CEO from January 1, 2015 through July 31, 2015.  The Committee determined that in spite of the impact of the adverse weather conditions, Mr. Pratt had provided outstanding leadership throughout the period, including during the leadership transition.  The Committee decided to recommend a discretionary bonus amount of $200,000.

The Compensation Committee then met in executive session to make the NEO bonus recommendations using its professional judgment and experience and a comparison to prior performance and annual period levels.  The Compensation Committee approved overall bonus amounts for the Company and recommended annual bonus amounts for the following executive officers. These recommendations were approved by the independent Directors of the Board, voting in an executive session.

Name 

 

2015 Bonus Amount ($)

 

2014 Bonus Amount ($)

 

$ increase

 

David L. King (1)

 

514,271

 

400,000

 

114,271

 

Brian Pratt (2)

 

200,000

 

100,000

 

100,000

 

Peter J. Moerbeek

 

335,000

 

325,000

 

10,000

 

John M. Perisich

 

335,000

 

325,000

 

10,000

 

Timothy R. Healy

 

250,000

 

250,000

 

 

Scott Summers

 

500,000

 

125,000

 

375,000

 


(1)         Mr. King served as President and CEO from August 1, 2015 through December 31, 2015.  Mr. King was Chief Operating Officer (COO) prior to August 2015.

(2)         Mr. Pratt served as President and CEO from January 1, 2015 through July 31, 2015.

Equity Awards

All of the NEOs are participants at the maximum level in the LTR Plan.  The executives designated approximately $322,000 of their bonus amount to purchase 19,250 shares, representing 21.5% of the total shares purchased under the LTR Plan.

Other Compensation Items

Pay Recoupment (Clawback) Policy

At this time, the following applies to executive officers: If the Company is required to prepare an accounting restatement due to the material noncompliance of the Company as a result of misconduct with any financial reporting requirement under the securities laws, any participant who knowingly or through gross negligence engaged in the misconduct, or who knowingly or through gross negligence failed to prevent the misconduct, and any participant who is one of the individuals subject to automatic forfeiture under Section 304 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, shall reimburse the Company the amount of any payment in settlement of an award earned or accrued during the twelve (12) month period following the first public issuance or filing with the SEC (whichever first occurred) of the financial document embodying such financial reporting requirement. The Board has sole discretion to make any and all decisions under this policy.

In July 2015, the SEC proposed new Exchange Act Rule 10D-1 to require national securities exchanges to adopt listing rules that require listed companies to adopt and disclose clawback policies.  Once the SEC adopts the rule, the listing exchanges will have 90 days to implement the rule which must be made effective within one year of adoption by the exchange.  Listed companies will then have a period of up to 60 days to implement the rule.

Risk Assessment

The Compensation Committee considered the risks associated with the Company’s compensation policies and practices for executive officers and determined that it did not identify any risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company. This conclusion was based on the following considerations:

·                  Extensive stock ownership by the executive management team.

·                  Conservative amount of the discretionary annual incentive compensation.  Since 2008, the largest annual incentive award made to an individual has not exceeded $500,000.

·                  Balanced approach to viewing Company performance and determining bonuses.

·                  Long-term nature of the executive team evidenced by negligible turn-over in executive management over time.

Executive Ownership Guidelines

We encourage our executives to own Company Common Stock because we believe that stock ownership provides a strong alignment of interests between executives and stockholders. Because most of our executives were significant owners in our predecessor companies or acquired significant stock ownership at the time of an acquisition, the Compensation Committee does not believe that a specific stock ownership goal would be meaningful at this time.

Tax Matters

Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code generally disallows a tax deduction to public companies for compensation over $1 million in any one year with respect to its CEO and each of the next three most highly compensated executive officers (excluding the CFO). Certain performance-based compensation, however, is not subject to the deduction limit. The Company structured the 2013 Equity Plan with the intention that certain performance awards made under the plan would qualify for tax deductibility. The Compensation Committee recognizes that certain incentive or retention stock awards may not qualify for tax deductibility above the Section 162(m) $1 million limitation.

Employment Agreements for Named Executive Officers

From 2008 through 2011, the Company entered into five year employment agreements with its executive officers. These agreements have expired.

At the time of his selection as CEO, effective August 1, 2015, the Company entered into a five year employment agreement with David L. King, setting out his annual base salary, plus a discretionary performance bonus opportunity and a measurable performance bonus opportunity, both of which can be paid in cash or discounted stock.  In the event of termination without cause, by death, disability or change of control, certain severance benefits will be paid, including a lump sum payment of 100% of base salary, a pro rata portion of a bonus, up to one year of the employee’s share of the premium for Cobra medical benefits, and acceleration of any shares obtained through bonus amounts.

Compensation Committee Report

The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors has reviewed and discussed with management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis contained in this Proxy Statement. Based on this review and discussion, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included herein and incorporated by reference into the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015.

Stephen C. Cook (Chairman)

Peter C. Brown

Robert A. Tinstman

Compensation Tables

Summary Compensation Table.  The following table and accompanying notes provide summary information with respect to total compensation earned or paid by us or our subsidiaries to our NEOs.

Name and Principal
Position

 

Year

 

Salary
($) (1)

 

Bonus
($) (2)

 

Stock
or
Option
Awards
($) (3)

 

All Other
Compensation
(4)

 

Total
($)

 

David L. King,

 

2015

 

599,712

 

514,271

 

2,669

 

53,810

 

1,170,462

 

President and

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Chief Executive Officer

 

2014

 

385,096

 

400,000

 

1,500,000

 

17,431

 

2,302,527

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2013

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Brian Pratt

 

2015

 

454,326

 

200,000

 

 

21,974

 

676,300

 

Chairman of the

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Board (5)

 

2014

 

630,288

 

100,000

 

 

34,702

 

764,990

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2013

 

600,000

 

500,000

 

 

118,640

 

1,218,640

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Peter J. Moerbeek,

 

2015

 

491,635

 

335,000

 

9,283

 

27,695

 

863,613

 

Executive Vice

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

President,

 

2014

 

448,173

 

325,000

 

2,858

 

14,202

 

790,233

 

Chief Financial

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Officer

 

2013

 

421,058

 

375,500

 

2,198,000

 

71,439

 

3,065,497

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

John M. Perisich

 

2015

 

394,712

 

335,000

 

 

29,726

 

759,438

 

Executive Vice

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

President and

 

2014

 

360,096

 

325,000

 

 

17,281

 

702,377

 

General Counsel

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2013

 

338,076

 

325,000

 

 

70,436

 

733,512

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Timothy R. Healy

 

2015

 

440,674

 

250,000

 

 

28,769

 

719,443

 

Co-President,

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ARB, Inc.

 

2014

 

404,135

 

250,000

 

 

20,651

 

674,786

 

(Industrial)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2013

 

372,386

 

475,000

 

 

89,109

 

936,495

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Scott Summers

 

2015

 

440,674

 

500,000

 

 

31,367

 

972,041

 

Co-President,

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ARB, Inc.

 

2014

 

404,135

 

125,000

 

 

21,898

 

551,033

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2013

 

372,116

 

400,000

 

 

80,534

 

852,650

 


(1)                      Salary includes all regular wages paid to the NEO and any amount that was voluntarily deferred by the NEO pursuant to our 401(k) Plan.

(2)                     Bonus amounts shown in this column includes any bonus amount that has been deferred to the following year under the Company’s LTR Plan. Participants in the LTR Plan must defer 50% of the annual award. Except in case of death, disability, retirement, involuntary separation from service, or approval by a special LTR Plan committee, the deferred compensation amount is paid to the participant only if employed by the Company on the payment date of bonus amounts the following year.

(3)                     On May 3, 2013, the Board entered into an RSU Agreement granting 100,000 Units to Mr. Moerbeek under the 2013 Equity Plan.  Each Unit represents the right to receive one share of Common Stock. Commencing annually on May 10, 2014 and ending April 30, 2017, the Units will vest in four equal installments.  As of March 31, 2016, a total of 50,000 Units had been vested, with the vested Units accruing “Dividend Equivalent Units” (as defined in the 2013 Equity Plan) and is reflected as additional compensation earned by Mr. Moerbeek.  At March 31, 2016, there were a total of 701 Dividend Equivalent Units accrued and vested.  An additional 25,000 Units will vest on April 30, 2016.

On March 24, 2014, the Board entered into an RSU Agreement granting 48,512 Units to David L. King, our COO.  Such Units vest 50% on September 23, 2015 and 50% on March 23, 2017.  Similarly, additional Units will be earned as “Dividend Equivalent Units” on vested Units.  A total of 24,256 Units had been vested as of March 31, 2016, with the vested Units accruing “Dividend Equivalent Units” (as defined in the 2013 Equity Plan) and is reflected as additional compensation earned by Mr. King.  At March 31, 2016, there were a total of 190 Dividend Equivalent Units accrued and vested.  An additional 24,256 Units will vest on March 24, 2017.

The amount shown in this column represents the aggregate grant date fair value of the Units granted by our Board of Directors computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718.  The fair value on the grant date for the Mr. Moerbeek Units was $21.98 per share and for Mr. King was $30.92 per share, both based on the market closing price of our stock on the grant date. These amounts reflect our accounting expense to be recognized over the vesting period of the Unit’s awarded, and do not correspond to the actual value that will be recognized by the NEO.  No Units were granted to our NEOs in 2015.

(4)                     All other compensation for the NEOs includes the following:

 

 

Year

 

Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
($) (a)

 

Personal
Use of
Company
Auto ($)

 

Personal
Use of
Company
Airplane
($) (b)

 

Company paid
contributions
to Employee
401(k) savings
account ($)

 

Relocation
Reimbursement
($)

 

Total Other
Compensation
($)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

David L. King

 

2015

 

19,807

 

7,774

 

15,829

 

10,400

 

 

53,810

 

 

 

2014

 

4,790

 

7,391

 

 

5,250

 

 

17,431

 

 

 

2013

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Brian Pratt

 

2015

 

 

 

11,574

 

10,400

 

 

21,974

 

 

 

2014

 

1,198

 

483

 

22,621

 

10,400

 

 

34,702

 

 

 

2013

 

82,285

 

2,365

 

23,790

 

10,200

 

 

118,640

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Peter J. Moerbeek

 

2015

 

12,903

 

11,400

 

 

3,392

 

 

27,695

 

 

 

2014

 

3,893

 

10,310

 

 

 

 

14,202

 

 

 

2013

 

61,711

 

9,728

 

 

 

 

71,439

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

John M. Perisich

 

2015

 

12,903

 

6,423

 

 

10,400

 

 

29,726

 

 

 

2014

 

3,893

 

2,989

 

 

10,400

 

 

17,281

 

 

 

2013

 

53,486

 

6,750

 

 

10,200

 

 

70,436

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Timothy R. Healy

 

2015

 

9,629

 

8,740

 

 

10,400

 

 

28,769

 

 

 

2014

 

2,995

 

7,256

 

 

10,400

 

 

20,651

 

 

 

2013

 

78,162

 

747

 

 

10,200

 

 

89,109

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Scott Summers

 

2015

 

19,257

 

1,710

 

 

10,400

 

 

31,367

 

 

 

2014

 

1,498

 

9,233

 

767

 

10,400

 

 

21,898

 

 

 

2012

 

65,824

 

220

 

4,290

 

10,200

 

 

80,534

 


(a)         All participants in the LTR Plan have the ability to purchase Company Stock at a 25% discount to the market price using up to one sixth of the participant’s current year earned bonus amount.  For 2015 participants, the discounted price was $16.75 per share based on the average closing price of the shares in December 2015. For 2014 participants, the discounted price was $16.84 per share based on the average closing price of the shares in December 2014.  For 2013 participants, the discounted price was $21.57 per share based on the average closing price of the shares in December 2013. The amounts shown in this column represent the difference between the discounted purchase price and the market price on the date that the executive was issued the shares.

(b)         For 2015 and 2014, the Company determined the value of personal use of the Company aircraft by the aggregate incremental cost to the Company, based on the cost of fuel, trip-related maintenance, crew travel expenses, landing fees, trip-related hangar costs and smaller variable costs. For tax purposes, income is imputed to the executive for non-business travel based on a multiple of the Standard Industry Fare Level (SIFL) rates.

For prior years, the amount charged to the executive as compensation for use of the Company airplane is based on equivalent aircraft charter rates in the southern United States geographic areas. Compensation is calculated based on non-business-related airborne hours.

(5)                     Effective August 1, 2015, Brian Pratt relinquished his role of Chief Executive Officer and President.  Mr. Pratt remains as Chairman of the Board and assumed the non-employee position of Senior Strategic Advisor.  The table shows compensation related to Mr. Pratt’s employment through July 31, 2015.

Grants of Plan-Based Awards, Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End, Options Exercised and Stock Grants Vested

The following table sets forth information regarding the Units granted to our NEOs during 2013 through 2015 under the 2013 Equity Plan.

Grants of Plan-Based Awards

 

 

Grant Date

 

All Other Stock Awards:
Number of Shares of Stock
or Units (a)

 

Grant Date Fair
Value of Stock
and Option
Awards ($) (b)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Peter J. Moerbeek

 

May 3, 2013

 

100,000

 

2,198,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

David L. King

 

March 24, 2014

 

48,512

 

1,500,000

 


(a)         The Unit awards reported in this column and the “Grant Date Fair Value of Stock and Option Awards” column represent long-term equity incentive awards granted by the Board of Directors under the 2013 Equity Plan.  Excluded from this table are the Dividend Equivalent Units provided for under the RSU Agreement grant, totaling 891 Dividend Equivalent Units accrued and vested at March 31, 2016.  These equity awards are disclosed in the Summary Compensation Table for fiscal years 2015 and 2014 and the Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End table and therefore do not constitute additional compensation not otherwise reported in this Proxy Statement.

(b)         The fair value of the Units are based on the closing market price of our Common Stock on the grant date.

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End

 

 

Stock Awards

 

 

 

Stock Grant Date

 

Number of Shares or Units
of Stock That Have Not
Vested (a)

 

Market Value of
Shares or Units
of Stock That
Have Not Vested
($) (b)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Peter J. Moerbeek

 

May 3, 2013

 

50,000

 

1,101,500

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

David L. King

 

March 24, 2014

 

24,256

 

534,360

 


(a)         Equity awards listed in this column represent Units awarded to the NEOs under the 2013 Equity Plan.

A total of 25,000 Units granted to Mr. Moerbeek vest annually beginning on May 10, 2014 and ending April 30, 2017.  As of March 31, 2016, a total of 50,000 Units had vested, with a total of 701 “Dividend Equivalent Units” (as defined in the 2013 Equity Plan) accrued and vested as of March 31, 2016.  An additional 25,000 Units will vest on April 30, 2016.

On September 23, 2015, 50% of the Units granted to Mr. King vested and 50% will vest on March 23, 2017, with a total of 190 Dividend Equivalent Units accrued and vested as of March 31, 2016.

(b)         Market value is calculated by multiplying the number of Units that have not vested by the closing market price of our Common Stock on December 31, 2015, which was $22.03 per share.

There were no other grants of plan-based awards to the NEOs during the calendar years 2015, 2014 or 2013. The LTR Plan provides participants an option to buy shares at a discount but does not grant shares of stock. The purchased shares are issued under the 2013 Equity Plan.

Equity Compensation Plan Information

The Company has adopted a long-term incentive plan for certain managers and its senior executives.  The plan provides for both the deferral of one-half of each participant’s annual earned bonus for one year and allows the participant the opportunity to purchase Company Common Stock at a 25% discount to the market price for up to one-sixth of the participants earned bonus amount. Shares are issued under provisions of the 2013 Equity Plan. Other than the Units issued to our CEO and CFO, there were no other grants of plan-based awards made in the current fiscal year, nor in prior years.

The following table lists the number of shares of Common Stock purchased by the NEOs under the long-term incentive plan for each year:

 

 

2015
No. of Shares

 

2014
No. of Shares

 

David L. King

 

5,118

 

3,959

 

Brian Pratt

 

 

990

 

Peter J. Moerbeek

 

3,334

 

3,217

 

John M. Perisich

 

3,334

 

3,217

 

Timothy R. Healy

 

2,488

 

2,475

 

Scott Summers

 

4,976

 

1,238

 

Total issued to Named Executive Officers

 

19,250

 

15,096

 

Each of the NEOs purchased the maximum number of shares allowed under the terms of the LTR Plan, representing 26.1% and 21.5% of the purchases for the 2015 and 2014 LTR Plan years, respectively.

Potential Payments Upon Termination

The Company has an employement agreement with David L. King, the President and Chief Executive Officer.  There are no other employement agreements with the other NEOs.  The terms of Mr. King’s employment agreement provides that we must pay certain severance benefits in the event Mr. King is terminated by us other than for “cause”, including salary continuation for a twelve month period.  For purposes of the following table, it will be assumed that the other NEOs receive salary continuation for a six month period, in accordance with their prior agreements.

The following table shows amounts that would be payable to each of our NEOs under the scenario that the executive is terminated without cause or leaves due to death or disability. The table assumes that the terminating event occurred on June 30, 2016.

 

 

Base
Salary (1)

 

Equity (2)

 

Bonus (3)

 

Health
Care
Benefits (4)

 

Accrued
Vacation (5)

 

Total (6)

 

David L. King

 

$

685,000

 

$

1,070,261

 

$

428,386

 

$

17,628

 

$

39,519

 

$

2,240,794

 

Peter J. Moerbeek

 

$

245,000

 

$

553,526

 

$

290,000

 

$

6,052

 

$

28,269

 

$

1,122,847

 

John M. Perisich

 

$

200,000

 

$

 

$

267,500

 

$

18,760

 

$

23,077

 

$

509,337

 

Timothy R. Healy

 

$

220,000

 

$

 

$

235,000

 

$

18,760

 

$

25,385

 

$

499,145

 

Scott E. Summers

 

$

220,000

 

$

 

$

360,000

 

$

18,760

 

$

25,385

 

$

624,145

 


(1)         Calculated as a lump sum payment equal to one-half of one year’s base salary (100% of one year for Mr. King).

(2)         Represents accelerated vesting, as of June 30, 2016, of Units granted under the terms of the RSU Agreement and the accelerated vesting of “Dividend Equivalent Units”.  The value is based on the closing price of our Common Stock at December 31, 2015.

(3)         In the event of termination without cause, or by death or disability, calculated as a lump sum payment equal to the bonus amount that would have been paid for the calendar year in which the termination occurs, determined after the end of the calendar year, pro rata to the date of termination. For purposes of this table, it was assumed that 25% of base salary would be paid. In addition, for participants in the Company’s Retention Plan, includes any deferred amounts in accordance with the terms of that plan.

(4)         In the event of the executive’s termination without cause or disability, he is entitled to one year of healthcare benefits. The amount reflects both the employee and employer portion of health care premium costs.

(5)         Each executive is allowed an accrual of up to three weeks of vacation. For purposes of this table, it was assumed that the full three weeks would be paid upon termination.

(6)         Other than the Units granted under the RSU Agreements described above, there have been no stock options or other stock compensation granted to any NEO.  Additionally, each NEO participates in the Company life insurance program, and in the event of death, such employee’s beneficiary would also receive a lump sum $50,000 payment.

Retirement Plans

We contribute to two plans that provide benefits to all employees. The plans do not provide any benefits for any executives other than those provided to all employees.

Our 401(k) Plan is qualified as an employee retirement plan under Section 401(a) and 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code. Participation is optional for employees once they are eligible to participate.

We also provide for a “Registered Retirement Saving Plan—Deferred Profit Sharing Plan” for certain Canadian employees. We make contributions based on a percentage of the amount of income deferred by the employee. No NEO is eligible for this plan.

2013 Equity Incentive Plan

Background.     In July 2008, the stockholders approved and the Company adopted the Primoris Services Corporation 2008 Long-term Incentive Equity Plan, which was replaced by the Primoris Services Corporation 2013 Equity Incentive Plan (“2013 Equity Plan”), approved by the stockholders and adopted by the Company on May 3, 2013.

The principal purpose of our 2013 Equity Plan is to provide incentives for our officers, employees and consultants, as well as the officers, employees and consultants of any of our subsidiaries. We believe that grants of options, restricted stock and other awards will stimulate their personal and active interest in our development and financial success, and induce them to remain in our employ or continue to provide services to us. In addition to awards made to officers, employees or consultants, the 2013 Equity Plan permits us to grant options or other equity securities to our Directors.

At the time of the adoption of the 2013 Equity Plan, 2,526,275 shares of our Common Stock were reserved for issuance. On May 3, 2013, the Board granted 100,000 Units to Mr. Peter J. Moerbeek and on March 24, 2014 granted 48,512 Units to Mr. David L. King, with each Unit representing the right to receive one share of the Company’s Common Stock.  The grant also provides for “Dividend Equivalent Units”, which provide additional Units to the participants. Other than these Unit grants, at December 31, 2015, there were no options issued to purchase our shares, no other stock based awards granted and there were no shares of restricted stock granted under the 2013 Equity Plan.

Shares of Common Stock that are forfeited or terminated will be available for future award grants under the 2013 Equity Plan. Any surrendered shares of previously owned stock by a participant used to cover the option exercise price or their withholding tax liability associated with an option exercise, may be added to the number of reserved shares available under the 2013 Equity Plan, subject to approval by the Board or the Compensation Committee, and relevant provisions in the 2013 Equity Plan.

Award Limitation.     No individual may be granted awards under the 2013 Equity Plan representing more than 200,000 shares of our Common Stock in any calendar year, which would include awards of stock options or SARs, stock awards and Units or performance shares.

Administration.     The 2013 Equity Plan is administered by our Compensation Committee and our Board. To administer the 2013 Equity Plan, the Compensation Committee recommends to the Board, among other things:

·                  The persons to whom awards may be granted;

·                  The specific type of awards to be granted;

·                  The number of shares subject to each award;

·                  Option or share prices;

·                  Any restrictions or limitations on the awards; and

·                  Any vesting, exchange, deferral, surrender, cancellation, acceleration, termination, exercise or forfeiture provisions related to the awards.

In the case of awards intended to qualify as “performance-based compensation” within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Code, the Compensation Committee must consist of at least two members of our Board, each of whom is an “outside independent Director” within the meaning of that section. Our Board will administer the 2013 Equity Plan with respect to awards to non-employee independent Directors.

Eligibility.     We may grant awards under the 2013 Equity Plan to employees, officers and Directors. In addition, we may grant awards to consultants who are deemed to have rendered, or to be able to render, significant services to us and who are deemed to have contributed, or to have the potential to contribute, to our success.

Awards.     The 2013 Equity Plan provides that we may grant awards of the following types of securities, among others:

·                  “incentive” stock options, as defined in Section 422 of the Code, and options that are not qualifying incentive options;

·                  stock appreciation rights to participants who have been, or are being, granted stock options under the 2013 Equity Plan;

·                  restricted stock; and

·                  other stock-based awards, subject to limitations under applicable law, that are denominated or payable in, valued in whole or in part by reference to, or otherwise based on, or related to, shares of Common Stock.

Accelerated Vesting and Exercisability.   The following events will cause acceleration in the vesting with respect to awards granted under the 2013 Equity Plan, subject to any limitations of Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code:

·                  If any one person, or more than one person acting as a group, acquires the ownership of our Common Stock that, together with the Common Stock held by such person or group, constitutes more than 50% of our total fair market value or of our combined voting power and our Board does not authorize or otherwise approve such acquisition; and/or

·                  The Compensation Committee may accelerate such vesting if there is an acquisition by any one person or more than one person acting as a group, together with the acquisition during the 12-month period ending on the date of the most recent acquisition by such person or persons, of our assets that have a total gross fair market value equal to more than 50% of the total gross fair market value of all of our assets immediately before such acquisition or acquisitions, or if any one person or more than one person acting as a group acquires the ownership of our Common Stock that, together with the Common Stock held by such person or group, constitutes more than 50% of the total fair market value or combined voting power of our Common Stock, which has been approved by our Board.

Additional Equity Compensation Plan Information

As shown in the table that follows, we have used the 2013 Equity Plan (and its 2008 predecessor plan) to issue shares of Common Stock and Units to our employees, and as part of their compensation, to our non-employee Directors.  Under the LTR plan, participants have the opportunity to purchase shares of Common Stock from the Company at a discount to market for up to one-sixth of their annual bonus award.

Plan category 

 

Shares Awarded or Granted to
Employees

 

Shares Awarded to
Non-employee Directors

 

Shares remaining at end of
period

 

Years 2008 through 2012

 

206,756

 

42,500

 

1,270,744

 

Shares issued January through April 2013

 

131,989

 

12,480

 

1,126,275

 

Shares available at adoption of the 2013 Equity Plan

 

 

 

2,526,275

 

Shares issued June to December 2013

 

 

9,110

 

2,517,165

 

Shares issued through December 31, 2014

 

77,455

 

12,547

 

2,427,163

 

Shares issued through December 31, 2015

 

96,828

 

17,916

 

2,312,419

 

Shares issued January 2016 to March 31 2016

 

85,907

 

10,450

 

2,216,062

 

The following table gives information about our Common Stock that may be issued upon the exercise of options, warrants, and rights as part of the Company’s 2013 Equity Plan as of March 31, 2016.

Plan category 

 

Number of securities to be
issued upon exercise of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights
under equity
plan

 

Weighted-average grant or
exercise price per share of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights

 

Number of securities
remaining available
for future issuance
under
equity compensation
plans
(excluding securities
reflected in
column (a))

 

 

 

(a)

 

(b)

 

(c)

 

Equity compensation plans approved by security holders

 

149,403

(1)

$

24.75

 

2,066,659

 

Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders

 

 

 

 

Total

 

149,403

 

$

24.75

 

2,066,659

 


(1)         Equity awards listed represent Units and Dividend Equivalents awarded through the RSU Agreements to the NEOs under the 2013 Equity Plan.

OTHER MATTERS

We are not aware of any matters other than those discussed in the foregoing materials contemplated for action at the 20162024 Annual Meeting. The person(s) named in your proxy will vote in accordance with the recommendation of the Board on any other matters incidental to the conduct of, or otherwise properly brought before, the Annual Meeting. Discretionary authority for them to do so is contained in the proxy.

SEC rules permit companies, brokers, banks or other intermediaries to deliver a single copy of this Proxy Statement and Annual Report to households at which two or more stockholders reside. This practice, known as “householding,” is

2024 PROXY STATEMENTPRIMORIS   |   67

TABLE OF CONTENTS

designed to reduce duplicate mailings and save significant printing and postage costs as well as natural resources. Stockholders sharing an address who have been previously notified by their broker, bank or other intermediary and have consented to householding will receive only one copy of our Proxy Statement and Annual Report. If you would like to opt out of this practice for future mailings and receive separate Proxy Statements and Annual Reports for each stockholder sharing the same address, please contact your broker, bank or other intermediary.

Stockholders sharing an address that are receiving multiple copies of the Proxy Statement or Annual Report can request delivery of a single copy of the Proxy Statement or Annual Report by contacting their broker, bank or other intermediary or sending a written request to the Company at Primoris Services Corporation, 2100 McKinney Avenue,2300 N. Field Street, Suite 1500,1900, Dallas, Texas 75201, Attention: Investor Relations, or by contacting us at (214) 740-5600. You may also obtain a separate Proxy Statement or Annual Report without charge by sending a written request to the above address. We will promptly send additional copies of the Proxy Statement or Annual Report upon receipt of such request.

Our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 20152023, is being mailed to all stockholders of record with this Proxy Statement. The Annual Report on Form 10-K does not constitute, and should not be considered, a part of this proxy solicitation material.

A copy of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015,2023, filed with the SEC is available without charge upon written request to:

Primoris Services Corporation
2100 McKinney Avenue,
2300 N. Field Street,
Suite 1500
1900
Dallas, Texas 75201

Attention: Investor Relations

Any stockholder or stockholder’s representative, who, because of a disability, may need special assistance or accommodation to allow him or her to participate at the Annual Meeting, may request reasonable assistance or accommodation from us by contacting Primoris Services Corporation, 2100 McKinney Avenue,2300 N. Field Street, Suite 1500,1900, Dallas, Texas 75201, or at (214) 740-5600. To provide us with sufficient time to arrange for reasonable assistance or accommodation, please submit all requests by April 25, 2016.

24, 2024.

Whether you intend to be present at the Annual Meeting or not, we urge you to return your signed proxy promptly.

By Order of the Board of Directors,
[MISSING IMAGE: sg_johnmperisich-bw.jpg]
John M. Perisich
Executive Vice President, Chief Legal and Administrative Officer and Secretary

By Order of the Board of Directors,

68   |   PRIMORIS

GRAPHIC

John M. Perisich

Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary

2024 PROXY STATEMENT

35


TABLE OF CONTENTS


[MISSING IMAGE: px_24primorisproxy1pg01-bw.jpg]

PRIMORISYOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT. PLEASE VOTE TODAY.Vote by Internet - QUICK ★★★ EASYIMMEDIATE - 24 Hours a Day, 7 Days a Week or by MailPRIMORIS SERVICES CORPORATION

PROXY FOR ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS, MAY 1, 2015
THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THECORPORATIONYour Internet vote authorizes the named proxies to vote your shares in the same manner as if you marked, signed and returned your proxy card. Votes submitted electronically over the Internet must be received by 11:59 p.m., Eastern Time, on April 30, 2024.INTERNET –www.cstproxyvote.comUse the Internet to vote your proxy. Have your proxy card available when you access the above website. Follow the prompts to vote your shares.Vote at the Meeting –To attend the virtual online annual meeting, visit:https://www.viewproxy.com/Primoris/2024/vmMAIL – Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope provided.PROXY CARD▲ FOLD HERE • DO NOT SEPARATE • INSERT IN ENVELOPE PROVIDED ▲Please markTHE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

The undersigned hereby appoints Brian Pratt as Proxy holder, with the power to appoint his substitute, and hereby authorizes him to represent and vote, as designated on the reverse side, all eligible shares of Common Stock of Primoris Services Corporation, held of record by the undersigned as of March 31, 2016, which the undersigned may be entitled to vote at the 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held at 9:00 a.m., Central Time, on Tuesday, May 3, 2016, at the Rosewood Crescent Hotel, located at 400 Crescent Court, Dallas, Texas 75201, and any continuation(s), postponement(s) or adjournment thereof.

IMPORTANT—PLEASE SIGN AND DATE ON THE REVERSE SIDE AND RETURN PROMPTLY

(Continued and to be marked, dated and signed, on the other side)

Address Change/Comments (mark the corresponding box on the reverse side)


FOLD AND DETACH HERE

The Board of Directors recommends a vote RECOMMENDS A VOTE “FOR” all proposals.

Please Mark Here for Address Change or Comments SEE REVERSE SIDE

o

Proposal 1—ALL PROPOSALS.your votes like thisProposal 1 — Election of Stephen C. Cook and Peter J. Moerbeek as Class B Directors—The Board recommends a vote “FOR”“FOR” each listed nominee as a Director for a three-yearone-year term expiring in 2019:

Nominee:

FOR

WITHHOLD

Stephen C. Cook

o

o

Peter J. Moerbeek

o

o

FOR

AGAINST

ABSTAIN

Proposal 2— Ratification of Appointment of Moss Adams, LLP as the Company’s Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for the year ending December 31, 2016 — The Board recommends a vote “FOR” ratification of Moss Adams, LLC as the Company’s Independent Registered Public Accountant.

o

o

o

This Proxy, when properly executed, will be voted according to your instructions. If no instructions are given but2025:Proposal 2 — Advisory, Non-Binding Vote Approving the proxy is signed, this Proxy will be voted Company’s Named Executive Officer Compensation. The Board recommends a vote “FOR” the approval

of the advisory,FOR allAGAINST ABSTAINNominees:1 — Michael E. ChingFOR WITHHOLDnon-binding proposal on the nominees listed in Proposal 1, and FOR on Proposal 2.  In his discretion,compensation of the Proxy holder is authorized toCompany’s namedexecutive officers.2 — Stephen C. Cook 3 — David L. KingProposal 3 — Ratification of Selection of Moss Adams LLP as the Company’s Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2024 — TheFOR AGAINST ABSTAIN4 — Carla S. Mashinski5 — Terry D. McCallister6 — Thomas E. McCormick 7 — Jose R. Rodriguez8 — John P. Schauerman 9 — Patricia K. WagnerBoard recommends a vote upon such other business“FOR” the ratification of the selection of Moss Adams, LLP as may properly come before the meetingCompany’s Independent Registered Public Accountant.Please Mark Here for Address Change or any adjournment or postponement thereof.

Signature:

Date:

Comments – REVERSE SIDECONTROL NUMBERSignature Signature, if held jointly Date , 2024 Please date this Proxy and sign it exactly as your name or names appear above. When shares are held by joint tenants, both should sign. When signing as an attorney, executor, administrator, trustee or guardian, please give full title as such. If shares are held by a corporation, please sign in full corporate name by the president or other authorized officer. If shares are held by a partnership, please sign in full partnership name by an authorized person.

personPLEASE DO NOT RETURN THE PROXY CARD IF YOU ARE VOTING ELECTRONICALLY.X



TABLE OF CONTENTS
[MISSING IMAGE: px_24primorisproxy1pg02-bw.jpg]
Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held May 1, 2024The Proxy Statement, Annual Report on Form 10-K and our 2023 Annual Report to Stockholders are available athttps://www.cstproxy.com/Primoris/2024/▲ FOLD AND DETACH HERE AND READ THE REVERSE SIDE

PROXY

PRIMORIS SERVICES CORPORATION

PROXY FOR ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS, MAY 3, 2016
THIS• DO NOT SEPARATE • INSERT IN ENVELOPE PROVIDED ▲THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

TheDIRECTORSPRIMORIS SERVICES CORPORATIONPROXY FOR ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS, MAY 1, 2024The undersigned hereby appoints Brian PrattDavid L. King as Proxy holder, with the power to appoint his substitute, and hereby authorizes him to represent and vote, as designated on the reverse side, all eligible shares of Common Stock of Primoris Services Corporation, held of record by the undersigned as of March 31, 2016,11, 2024, which the undersigned may be entitled to vote at the 20162024 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held at 9:00 a.m., Central Time, on Tuesday,Wednesday, May 3, 2016,1, 2024, virtually at the Rosewood Crescent Hotel, located at 400 Crescent Court, Dallas, Texas 75201,https://www.viewproxy.com/Primoris/2024/vm, and any continuation(s), postponement(s) or adjournment thereof.

IMPORTANT—thereof.THIS PROXY, WHEN PROPERLY EXECUTED, WILL BE VOTED ACCORDING TO YOUR INSTRUCTIONS. IF NO INSTRUCTIONS ARE GIVEN BUT THE PROXY IS SIGNED, THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED FOR ALL THE NOMINEES LISTED IN PROPOSAL 1, FOR ON PROPOSAL 2 AND FOR ON PROPOSAL 3. IN HIS DISCRETION, THE PROXY HOLDER IS AUTHORIZED TO VOTE UPON SUCH OTHER BUSINESS AS MAY PROPERLY COME BEFORE THE MEETING OR ANY ADJOURNMENT OR POSTPONEMENT THEREOF.IMPORTANT—PLEASE SIGN AND DATE ON THE REVERSE SIDE AND RETURN PROMPTLY

PROMPTLYAddress Change/Comments (mark the corresponding box on the reverse side)–––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––(Continued and to be marked, dated and signed, on the other side)

Address Change/Comments (mark the corresponding box on the reverse side)



0001361538 5 2023-01-01 2023-12-31